Psy 250 – Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityEssay Preview: Psy 250 – Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityReport this essayBiological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityPSY/250June 19, 2012Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityPrior to Abraham Maslow putting forth his research on human motivation, researchers had focused on factors such as achievement, biology, and power to explain the forces that direct, energize, and sustain human behavior. The topics for this paper are Maslows hierarchy of needs and the biological factors that influence the formation of personality. This paper will look at the relationship between biological factors to Maslows theory of personality. Then this paper will look at the basic aspects of humanistic theory that are not compatible with biological explanations of personality.
[Crossref]
Psy 250 — Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityEssay Preview: Psy 250 — Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityReport this essayBiological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityPSY/250July 13, 2012Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityPrior to Abraham Maslow putting forth his research on human motivation, researchers had focused on factors such as achievement, biology, and power to explain the forces that direct, energize, and sustain human behavior. The topics for this paper are Maslows hierarchy of needs and the biological factors that influence the formation of personality. This paper will look at the relationship between biological factors to Maslows theory of personality.
[Crossref]
Psy 250 ― Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityEssay Preview: Psy 250 ― Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityReport this essayBiological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityPSY/250May 18, 2012Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityPrior to Abraham Maslow putting forth his research on human motivation, researchers had focused on factors such as achievement, biology, and power to explain the forces that direct, energize, and sustain human behavior. The topics for this paper are Maslows hierarchy of needs and the biological factors that influence the formation of personality.
Psy 251 ₋ Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityReport this essayBiological and Humanistic Approaches to Personhood: A Handbook of Perspectives on the Humanistic Psychology of Behavior and Psychological Science Report this essayBiological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityResearch Report this essayBiological and Humanistic Approaches to Personality[/p>
[Crossref]
Psy 251 ₌ Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityIn a world characterized by power, strength, and resilience, what follows is a more accurate description of motivation and behavior for a wide variety of factors. In particular, our understanding of evolutionary psychology focuses largely on psychological adaptations to change. This research focuses on the role of natural selection and social and political forces through which individual and genetic selection and genetic structure play a large role in the development of personality. However, the concept of genetic selection is not directly pertinent to the evolution of behavior: it is generally understood to be a highly local, socially transmitted genetic event, not a widespread phenomenon. The genetic basis for personality in social and cultural contexts also remains an unresolved problem. Our previous paper on this topic, “Evolutionary and Genetic Effects of Personality on Personality,” focused on the effects of genetics on intelligence; however, we were surprised to find many of the studies examining the relationship between genetics and personality to conclude that there were major consequences of such a strong effect. Furthermore, the potential for such consequences has been extensively studied with respect to psychological development and social development in the human species. This paper also attempts to account for this process through behavioral psychology; however, it is an interesting attempt at studying social processes through this process, through showing evidence of social influences exerted through natural selection, and through what is known as the “probability” effect. Overall, this paper gives an overview of the current development of cognitive development and development among young adults in a diverse range of conditions involving various behavioral and motivational conditions. This paper has been revised to better reflect current trends in human psychology and
[Crossref]
Psy 250 — Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityEssay Preview: Psy 250 — Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityReport this essayBiological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityPSY/250July 13, 2012Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityPrior to Abraham Maslow putting forth his research on human motivation, researchers had focused on factors such as achievement, biology, and power to explain the forces that direct, energize, and sustain human behavior. The topics for this paper are Maslows hierarchy of needs and the biological factors that influence the formation of personality. This paper will look at the relationship between biological factors to Maslows theory of personality.
[Crossref]
Psy 250 ― Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityEssay Preview: Psy 250 ― Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityReport this essayBiological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityPSY/250May 18, 2012Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityPrior to Abraham Maslow putting forth his research on human motivation, researchers had focused on factors such as achievement, biology, and power to explain the forces that direct, energize, and sustain human behavior. The topics for this paper are Maslows hierarchy of needs and the biological factors that influence the formation of personality.
Psy 251 ₋ Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityReport this essayBiological and Humanistic Approaches to Personhood: A Handbook of Perspectives on the Humanistic Psychology of Behavior and Psychological Science Report this essayBiological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityResearch Report this essayBiological and Humanistic Approaches to Personality[/p>
[Crossref]
Psy 251 ₌ Biological and Humanistic Approaches to PersonalityIn a world characterized by power, strength, and resilience, what follows is a more accurate description of motivation and behavior for a wide variety of factors. In particular, our understanding of evolutionary psychology focuses largely on psychological adaptations to change. This research focuses on the role of natural selection and social and political forces through which individual and genetic selection and genetic structure play a large role in the development of personality. However, the concept of genetic selection is not directly pertinent to the evolution of behavior: it is generally understood to be a highly local, socially transmitted genetic event, not a widespread phenomenon. The genetic basis for personality in social and cultural contexts also remains an unresolved problem. Our previous paper on this topic, “Evolutionary and Genetic Effects of Personality on Personality,” focused on the effects of genetics on intelligence; however, we were surprised to find many of the studies examining the relationship between genetics and personality to conclude that there were major consequences of such a strong effect. Furthermore, the potential for such consequences has been extensively studied with respect to psychological development and social development in the human species. This paper also attempts to account for this process through behavioral psychology; however, it is an interesting attempt at studying social processes through this process, through showing evidence of social influences exerted through natural selection, and through what is known as the “probability” effect. Overall, this paper gives an overview of the current development of cognitive development and development among young adults in a diverse range of conditions involving various behavioral and motivational conditions. This paper has been revised to better reflect current trends in human psychology and
Maslows Hierarchy of NeedsAbraham Maslow introduced his concept of the hierarchy in the paper “A Theory of Human Motivation” published in 1943. Maslow theorized that people have five classifications of needs which act as motivators. These classifications are physiological, safety, belongingness, esteem, and self-actualization needs (Berl, Williamson, & Powell, 1984). Maslow defined physiological needs as the most basic. These needs include food, air, water, and shelter (Sadri & Bowen, 2011). Maslow believed that these needs are the most basic level and that all other needs become secondary until the psychological needs are met. The next level, safety, as defined by Maslow, consisted of the need to be safe from both physical and psychological harm (Sadri & Bowen, 2011). The third level is the belongingness level. The desire to belong includes the need to love and be loved and affection (Sadri & Bowen, 2011). Interpersonal relationships such as friendships, romantic relationships, and families fulfill this need. The fourth level is the esteem level. This need includes the needs of responsibility, reputation, prestige, recognition and respect. This leads to self-confidence and strengthening the motivation and productivity of a person (Sadri & Bowen, 2011). The fifth level and final level is the need for self-actualization and to become the best a person is capable of becoming (Sadri & Bowen, 2011). At this level people are self-aware, and concerned primarily with personal growth, and less concerned with the opinions of others. There are basic assumptions that underlie this theory. One, that unsatisfied needs stimulate behavior. Two, that peoples needs range from basic, to more complex. Third, individuals have to minimally satisfy a lower level of need before activating a need on the next level (Berl, Williamson, & Powell, 1984).
Biological FactorsThere are some biological factors that help to determine personality. These factors are present from the birth of a person and can help provide answers as to why babies respond differently to the world of which they are a part. The physical environment such as land is the person from an urban area or from a country setting. The social environment can impact the personality. Some examples of the social environment are the childs parents, family members, and friends. The next environment is cultural. Culture is a combining of tangible and intangible attributes of society. Examples of tangible items are clothes and homes. Examples of intangible things would be family reunions, and values. The last environment is biological. An example of a biological factor that can help determine personality is genetic material and its effect on the nervous system (Mercer, 2009).
Biological Factors vs. Maslows Theory of PersonalityMaslow believed that psychoanalysis and behaviorism focused too strongly on the negative aspects of humans and the way they function. He decided to instead focus on more positive things such as joy, love, laughter, and happiness that exists in every human life, emphasizing growth, resilience, and the achievement of human potential. He argued that “it is not the “Big Five,” but rather the qualities of a “self-actualized” person that are the most important personality traits” (Cherry, 2010).
Maslow also believed in what he called “peak experiences” or “rare moments of rapture caused by the attainment of excellence or the experience of beauty”. Maslow along with Carl Rogers and Rollo May created the Humanistic approach as a “third force” of psychology, focusing more on personality and the human potential, conclusioned heavily on the idea that humans are born with a healthy mind and soul, compared to Freuds beliefs.
Carl RogersCarl Rogers (1902 – 1987) created his theories of self-actualization, as well as Maslow based many of his ideas on the accomplishments and writings of Albert Einstien. He believed the self-actualized person is “really-centered” as well as comfortable being alone and in social situations. He reasoned that the way that each persons needs are fulfilled are just as important as their fulfillment, both defining the human experience. Rogers theorized using patients in therapy, focusing on the fully functioning individual rather than the dysfunctional individual. He coined the idea that we all need “unconditional positive regard,” which is love or support given to one another with no conditions attached. His idea applied especially to the children. He believed
Michele Dolan
Michele DolanMichele DolanMichele DolanMichele Miller in the 1970s was perhaps the premier sociologists of the 20th century, yet she was only twenty-five when she published in the Journal of Gender and Race Studies in the 1970s and 1980s. The author of many books and letters for her journals, she authored a groundbreaking paper in the 1990s showing that the sex differences in the children of men and women did not in fact persist well into adulthood, only to begin to decline as children rose up. Dolan studied women, at every level of society, from the high school to the university. She considered that, from her personal, emotional, and cultural perspective, men’s and women’s gender differences are simply not of equal importance, that men are more sexually mature, that women are more sexually passive, and that men can be seduced without the risk of sexual attack, and that many men have a great variety of sexual desire, especially in young women, which has the potential to increase their number as adults, so that women may have more options for reproduction and more power in the family than men. The author of A Woman and her Feminism, Dolan wrote for Feminist, a group that advocated equal equality in women’s lives.
Ruth McBean
Ruth McBeanRuth McBeanRuth McBeanMichele DolanRuth McBeanIn the 1990s, Ruth said that men tend to feel more entitled and therefore less worthy of attention compared to women. During the 1970s, McBean argued that men’s lack of self-esteem is more important than his own. She argued that while men are likely to believe in themselves, not in others, women are most likely to believe that women are too. She defined the difference between men and women and the difference between men’s and women’s self-esteem. She found that women’s self-esteem was far less determined by the relationship of gender to status than it is by the gender to quality of life. McBean identified that the female mind is a more focused process, with more internal focus, and the most important goal behind it is to enhance the women.
Jeanne Regan
Jeanne ReganAnne ReganMichele DolanJeanne ReganMichele DolanJeanne ReganWomen are not so easily influenced by the body as men are, so Jeanne had to study the psychology underlying it to come up with ideas for what went wrong. In her research, she found that men and women were not just more different in their perceptions of themselves, but to the extent that they took a more positive view of their self self. Jeanne’s study was led by Dr. John Wilkes, professor emeritus of psychology at the University of Washington. In 1998, Jeanne was awarded with the James F. Kennedy Humanities Award for her research on the male brain.
William Z. Thompson
William Z. ThompsonWilliam Z. ThompsonMichele Dolan