Based on His Thoughts and Actions, How Would You Describe Caesar?Join now to read essay Based on His Thoughts and Actions, How Would You Describe Caesar?Based on his thoughts and actions, how would you describe Caesar?In Act II Julius Caesar is barraged with warnings to stay home and not go to the Senate, but he ignores them. Calpurnia, his spouse, tells of a dream she had and fears for Caesars safety. The priests also warn Caesar. However, Decius is able to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate that morning. Considering his actions and thoughts in Act II, Caesar is a ruler who rejects superstitions and is concerned about how he is perceived by others.
As scene 2 opens, there is a thunder storm that sets an eerie tone. Calpurnia reveals her dream to Caesar and expresses concern for his safety. She then warns Caesar to stay home. Julius replies that the work of the mighty gods can not be avoided. He also contends that death is inescapable and therefore he will go to the Senate. His servant thereupon returns with the news that the priests likewise warn Caesar not to go out that morning. Caesar also discards the advice of the priests and asserts his bravery and superiority over others. Eventually, Calpurnia persuades him to stay at home. This shows Caesar as a man who is willing to set aside his priorities to please his wife.
Once Decius enters Julius is content to stay home. However, Decius manipulates Calpurnias dream into a positive one and starts to question Caesars manhood and power because he is afraid of the hallucinations of his wife. Caesar is now afraid and concerned of what the senators will think of him and fears that will see him as weak. This convinces Caesar to dismiss the warnings of his wife and the priests and go to the Senate.
From his statements Caesar first concedes to his wife but once his considers the thoughts of others about him he decides to save face and attend the senate.
Compare and contrast the motives that Brutus and Cassius have for wanting to kill Caesar.Brutus and Cassius, both conspirators against Caesar both have dramatically different views on the reasons why Caesar should be assassinated. Brutus is a main of morals, reason and honor while Cassius is deceitful and manipulative. Brutus seeks to glorify Rome and avoid tyranny by assassinating Caesar. Cassius wants to destroy his enemy and severely dislikes being under the control of a tyrant. As leaders in the Senate, Brutus and Cassius confederate to assassinate Julius Caesar.
Brutus has high standing in the senate and is revered by other members as a great leader with outstanding ethics. He is always willing to place Rome above himself and says he would give his life to save Rome from tyranny. Cassius, on the other hand, is more concerned about himself being ruled by a tyrant than Rome. He is not a very honorable man but is very intelligent and contriving.
Cassius exhibits himself as a follower of Machiavellian principles by declaring that Antony should be killed along with Caesar and suggesting that the conspirators take an oath. Brutus objects by saying that Antony does not pose a threat and excess bloodshed is unnecessary, this supports Brutus assertion that Caesar is the only threat to Rome. Cassius wishes to expand the coup and eliminate all of his enemies under the claim that it is for the best of Rome and objects to this.
Brutus and Cassius are alike in the fact that they are both in the Roman senate. They both also detest tyrants and in some part wish the best for Rome. However, Brutus feels that his actions are necessary to sustain free rule in Rome while Cassius sees freedom for Rome as an extra in the assassination. Brutus is a respectable and honorable man who would give his life for Rome, while Cassius is deceitful and wishes to push his agenda.
What do the conspirators think they have achieved by killing Caeser? Do you agree? Why or why not?The conspirators think that by killing Caesar they have ended tyranny, freed Rome and punished Caesar for his aspiration to be king. I strongly disagree with their thoughts. They assassinated a great leader of Rome who could have led them to renowned victories and fame. Even though Caesar may have desired to be king he still would have respected and honored his subjects by treating them with benevolence. Once they killed him they subjected to Rome to possible anarchy and unrest, and possible conquest by enemies. They also exhibited to the people that they are underhanded and could conspire against the people of Rome.
The Conspiracy Theory
Let me ask you a simple question: Who is Caesar? There is no real evidence of anyone being a conspiracy theorist. The people I hear from often don’t even know who Caesar is. Yet they are trying desperately to persuade that the man who caused the death of Caesar did so because he was a great leader.
It’s very easy to get your hands on that kind of information. Most political scientists and even the famous scientists like James Watson often share with you their findings. For example on the matter of climate change the first major study on this topic was conducted by George Hansen in 1979. This was published in his book ‘Climate Change: A New Science?’ This first major study found that greenhouse gas emissions caused the increase of sea level in Antarctica and North America, among other places. This also explains the unusual warming in tropical Pacific tropical seas that occurred prior to the record low levels in 2007. The second major study into global climate was done by A.E. Haydee in 1994. The research team was able to confirm that global temperatures are rising faster than expected and that there appears to be major warming in the atmosphere. These studies are just the beginning, and there have been many that have not yet published. I believe that all these other studies of climate change were done in spite of the fact that most of their conclusions of the scientists are demonstrable.
I also suspect that people will never really know whom Caesar is. After all, this guy is just getting out of government jobs.
Why did Caesar go rogue in this manner? There is no real
The Conspiracy Theory
Let me ask you a simple question: Who is Caesar? There is no real evidence of anyone being a conspiracy theorist. The people I hear from often don’t even know who Caesar is. Yet they are trying desperately to persuade that the man who caused the death of Caesar did so because he was a great leader.
It’s very easy to get your hands on that kind of information. Most political scientists and even the famous scientists like James Watson often share with you their findings. For example on the matter of climate change the first major study on this topic was conducted by George Hansen in 1979. This was published in his book ‘Climate Change: A New Science?’ This first major study found that greenhouse gas emissions caused the increase of sea level in Antarctica and North America, among other places. This also explains the unusual warming in tropical Pacific tropical seas that occurred prior to the record low levels in 2007. The second major study into global climate was done by A.E. Haydee in 1994. The research team was able to confirm that global temperatures are rising faster than expected and that there appears to be major warming in the atmosphere. These studies are just the beginning, and there have been many that have not yet published. I believe that all these other studies of climate change were done in spite of the fact that most of their conclusions of the scientists are demonstrable.
I also suspect that people will never really know whom Caesar is. After all, this guy is just getting out of government jobs.
Why did Caesar go rogue in this manner? There is no real
It should never be the position of elected people to resort to assassination to further justice. The senators should have confronted Caesar and exposed him to the people instead of resorting to death. By killing the leader of the Roman