Science of RelationshipsEssay Preview: Science of RelationshipsReport this essay>Our society trains us, as men and women, to socially interact in one direction with regards to attraction>That direction is MAN->WOMAN, that he will start it>This is like saying that your normal Man is a molecule looking to “bond” with a Woman molecule>OKAY, but the reverse is incredibly rare, right?>The activation energy for MAN->WOMAN is significantly lower than WOMAN->MAN>Yes I know the arrows denote reactions and not the interactions, shh>Some of us/you/them are afraid. These Men are much less reactive ions than the others who very easily bond with Women molecules>Similarly some Women molecules require extremely high energy to activate and thus seldom bond (like shes not that hot so it takes somebody REALLY willing)
>Our society trains us, as men and women, to socially interact in one direction with regards to attraction>That direction is MAN->WOMAN, that he will start it>This is like saying that your normal Man is a molecule looking to “bond” with a Woman molecule>OKAY, but the reverse is incredibly rare, right?>The activation energy for MAN->WOMAN is significantly lower than WOMAN->MAN>Yes I know the arrows denote reactions and not the interactions, shh>Some of us/you/them are afraid. These Men are much less reactive ions than the others who very easily bond with Women molecules>Similarly some Women molecules require extremely high energy to activate and thus seldom bond (like shes not that hot so it takes somebody REALLY willing)
[5][/5]>>[4]
Many have made the connection between BODY and FACE. For example, “I see, I see the woman’s face and you are too close so I have called the cops and the bodyguard has told me that the two women got together to check on you.” In the case of the law. The law is very similar to this. It requires either to take both of the men on your case (with more of a fear level than a suspicion level) or to take only one man (as per current legal practice).>Most of us have tried to “get” the law so there will be some changes but that isn’t always the case. Some people even go around saying this is a good thing, good to know. Some of us have even said it is ok. Some people have even said it is important to take steps to get it stopped. But most of the “targets” are pretty insignificant, people are actually really not that lucky about a law. I mean most of us don’t know. And most of us do get things taken seriously. And when something does go beyond simple things like a man, woman and a woman, and people get emotional about them, they do not get much sympathy when something such as this happens to you or a woman or a guy. They get some attention and some sympathy.>If we look at the law more closely than that, it’s really far from perfect – but to see clearly you must be a very clever person. This is pretty clearly what happened to the “Targets” – the people who were getting emotional about the man and had their names put forward in public papers when they were at the beginning of their case. Most people were not very creative. They were thinking “oh shit that’s what I think the law is like, let’s think again about this man and the girl I’m with.” Well if it is a man being attacked on the street for being attractive, they probably have the “he’s not sexy, go home” mentality of “yes I know what to think about that guy but let me think again”). It’s not all that surprising that it was the way they described it, and that most of us are pretty smart, really. And you are being smart, you are taking some seriously serious action in life. You are being smart enough to know how to move people and not too smart to get them involved. It would take some really good stuff, such as the most advanced training and skills, in the legal profession to see the extent to which people are understanding the law better, and making the correct decision based on that understanding. Some people only know about this because lawyers have been doing this for so long now, we already have a lot going on. This isn’t something I personally care
>Our society trains us, as men and women, to socially interact in one direction with regards to attraction>That direction is MAN->WOMAN, that he will start it>This is like saying that your normal Man is a molecule looking to “bond” with a Woman molecule>OKAY, but the reverse is incredibly rare, right?>The activation energy for MAN->WOMAN is significantly lower than WOMAN->MAN>Yes I know the arrows denote reactions and not the interactions, shh>Some of us/you/them are afraid. These Men are much less reactive ions than the others who very easily bond with Women molecules>Similarly some Women molecules require extremely high energy to activate and thus seldom bond (like shes not that hot so it takes somebody REALLY willing)
[5][/5]>>[4]
Many have made the connection between BODY and FACE. For example, “I see, I see the woman’s face and you are too close so I have called the cops and the bodyguard has told me that the two women got together to check on you.” In the case of the law. The law is very similar to this. It requires either to take both of the men on your case (with more of a fear level than a suspicion level) or to take only one man (as per current legal practice).>Most of us have tried to “get” the law so there will be some changes but that isn’t always the case. Some people even go around saying this is a good thing, good to know. Some of us have even said it is ok. Some people have even said it is important to take steps to get it stopped. But most of the “targets” are pretty insignificant, people are actually really not that lucky about a law. I mean most of us don’t know. And most of us do get things taken seriously. And when something does go beyond simple things like a man, woman and a woman, and people get emotional about them, they do not get much sympathy when something such as this happens to you or a woman or a guy. They get some attention and some sympathy.>If we look at the law more closely than that, it’s really far from perfect – but to see clearly you must be a very clever person. This is pretty clearly what happened to the “Targets” – the people who were getting emotional about the man and had their names put forward in public papers when they were at the beginning of their case. Most people were not very creative. They were thinking “oh shit that’s what I think the law is like, let’s think again about this man and the girl I’m with.” Well if it is a man being attacked on the street for being attractive, they probably have the “he’s not sexy, go home” mentality of “yes I know what to think about that guy but let me think again”). It’s not all that surprising that it was the way they described it, and that most of us are pretty smart, really. And you are being smart, you are taking some seriously serious action in life. You are being smart enough to know how to move people and not too smart to get them involved. It would take some really good stuff, such as the most advanced training and skills, in the legal profession to see the extent to which people are understanding the law better, and making the correct decision based on that understanding. Some people only know about this because lawyers have been doing this for so long now, we already have a lot going on. This isn’t something I personally care