Active Citizenship – A Means Of Exclusion
Essay Preview: Active Citizenship – A Means Of Exclusion
Report this essay
Assignment 2
ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP – A means of exclusion?
It has been claimed that schools should be societys chosen agency for training for citizenship. Discuss the link between citizenship and education and ways in which this relationship has changed over the 20th century.
Illustrate your discussion with reference to aspects of Australia education and students with disabilities.
ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP – A means of exclusion?
Although institutions such as the family and church play a significant role in preparing children for adult life, schools are Australias primary training ground for its future citizens. Marginson (1997) claims that unlike other institutions, schools remain open to government intervention and social change (Marginson, 1997, p.5) and therefore enable the promotion of certain values, certain knowledges – all of which are determined by the government. This essay will argue that schools are thus clearly a training ground for citizenship, but differentially so. Society is made up of various groups – gender, race, ethnic, religious, socio-economic – each of which is positioned differentially in relation to the rights and opportunities available to them as Australian citizens. One such group is children labelled as special – children with disabilities. The purpose of this essay is to examine citizenship as it relates to education, and special education particularly, and the ways in which this relationship has changed over the past century.
According to The American Websters Dictionary of Law, a citizen is “a native or naturalized individual who owes allegiance to a government and is entitled to the enjoyment of governmental protection and to the exercise of civil rights” (“Merriam-Websters dictionary of law”, 1996). Citizenship is the active state of being a citizen. Education is the knowledge and development resulting from the process of being educated (“Merriam-Websters Dictionary of Law”, 1996), whilst special education refers to education for students (as in the handicapped, learning-disabled, impaired) with special educational needs.
In 1860, the aim of public education was “to influence the whole body politic: to raise the standard of intelligenceto raise the State itself to the highest possible condition of moral and intellectual excellence” (Barcan, 1980, p.102). A focus on curriculum reform ensued in the years leading into the 20th century, with curriculum focusing not only on the acquisition of basic literacy and numeracy skills, but also on an “inculcation of morality, a sense of citizenship and a knowledge of the physical world” (Barcan, 1980, p.203). According to Marshall (1979) “the aim of education during childhood is to shape the future adult” (Marshall, 1997, p.229).
By making education free, compulsory and secular in the late 19th century (Barcan 1980), not only was the government ensuring a greater level of universal literacy, but at the same time, raising the moral standard of the whole Nation. It was thus recognised early in the 20th century that schools were a moral training-ground and that “literacy alone [does] not bring about a diminution of crime and citizenship require[s] more than the ability to read and write” (Barcan 1980, p.234). Moral objectives became important aspects of the educational curriculum – the development of character, the encouragement of a sense of active citizenship (Barcan, 1980, p.234).
In the early 20th century, active citizenship was depicted by Dr. Boyd as a comprehensive state – “the good citizen is the good member of society in all its aspects: good neighbour, good family man, good worker, good politician” (Boyd 1938, p. 191, cited in Marginson 1997, p.246). In this sense, citizenship was viewed as much more than knowledge about the way the government is structured, or a sense of belonging to a particular country. Rather, citizenship was seen to be an action – a forming of personal judgements, taking an active role in society (Marginson, 1997, p.246). Many other researchers (Crittenden, 1995; Hill, 1996; Kennedy, 1995; Macintyre, 1996) also support this notion of an active citizenship, underpinned by a common set of values. However, in this very depiction of citizenship as an action, it can be seen that constraints are placed upon those who, for various reasons, cannot participate fully in the act of being a citizen, including the group labelled as disabled.
Within education, citizenship is clearly represented as an active participation in society, encompassing the preparation of young people for their roles and responsibilities as future citizens (Kerr, 1999, p.2). Ross (2004) supports the view that education gives young people the knowledge, skills and values necessary for an active participation in society as citizens (Ross 2004, p.249). Kennedy (2000, 2003) talks about the need to develop civic capacity in young people, producing citizens who are capable of “thinking and acting appropriately in the public interest” (Kennedy, 2003, p.59). The task of the education system in engendering active citizenship is to promote what all citizens have in common, including values, political structures and a willingness to participate actively in the democratic processes of society (Kennedy, 2003, p.58).
According to Marginson (1997), education was expected to contribute to economic and political growth and development of the nation. It was also expected to broaden the character and reach of modern citizenship, to increase the standards of living and produce greater opportunities, equality and social reform (Marginson, 1997, p.42). For much of the 20th century, the formation of citizens with economic and vocational attributes thus became a theme of education and economic policy (Marginson, 1997, p.6). “Schools help prepare young people to enter fully into the life of their society. This education for active citizenship requires… the skills necessary to participate effectively, a growing capacity to exercise self-discipline and moral judgement and an increasing commitment to democratic values and fair processes; and concern for the common good” (Directorate of School Education 1992, cited in (Lewis, 1999, p.15)). Kennedy (2003) also supports these educational goals, asserting that the goals of citizenship and education in the 20th century should include: building