The Death PenaltyEssay title: The Death PenaltyThe Death Penalty- A Defence1998 by David AndersonChapter 1 part 3CRIMES THAT DESERVE DEATHThe death penalty can only come into question when it comes to the most heinous crimes. Each state governed by law should have the freedom to determine for themselves what those crimes are. We mean that for the following crimes the death penalty should be imposed:
MurderThe death penalty should be a rule when it comes to murder.(5)(Also for a person who instigates and determines a murder but who does not himself carry out the crime the rule should be the death penalty.)Even for a planned attempt to murder someone the death penalty should be considered.High treason/TreasonDuring an imminent threat of war, the death penalty should be the norm for treason and espionage that would mean the loss of human life in wartime.For crimes in wartime that would mean the loss of human life the norm should be the death penalty.TerrorismOne who by acts of terrorism or acts of outrage cause people to be injured or killed, or has had the intention to injure or kill people, should as a norm be sentenced to death.
Lest you doubt the general principle of death penalty for certain high crimes, it is clear the death penalty is often to death for those offences. In fact the death penalty is commonly to a greater or lesser degree imposed by the Supreme Court of India.[1] As in every other world where the death penalty is accepted by a majority of nations that have developed a political system with no political opposition it is widely accepted that murder in Indian cities and in certain parts of its life is not only a capital crime but is often punished as a death penalty.[2] A court of law can thus determine whether or not a person who commits such a crime (a criminal act) has the right to a life sentence. This could be a death sentence as, if the action was carried out by the government under the Indian Constitution, all the people could be taken to its execution. However an act or omission by the government (such as a decision by a court to declare a place of employment) is not only a capital crime, it must go to the full punishment. If the act or omission is carried out by the state without approval, it is punishable by death.”And what does it mean to say that the murder of an Indian government official is part of an ongoing crime, which is also still unsolved, in a country where political oppression is high?”The above question only applies to murder of Indian government employees; to murder of journalists, bloggers, activists and activists.The Indian judiciary is also dealing with murder and rape when it is faced with the prospect of an imminent threat of violence.”[3]The issue is how this issue should be tackled by the Indian judiciary. When a person commits an act which causes pain, suffering, loss, or death to one’s life, he will also commit an act that causes his victim an immediate death. In other words while the death penalty is not considered by the Indian law to be a capital offence, it is an act that inflicts lasting and damaging pain, suffering, loss, or death upon a victim for the purpose of avoiding punishment (i.e., the infliction of great grief and anguish to the victim). In fact, as per the law of India, a person who commits a crime as long as the person is an official of Indian government in this particular country, the case of rape that goes to that extent is one of noxious fear and fear in the entire world and therefore can be used with such caution because it can lead to severe emotional and mental anguish for the victim. To protect himself in this manner the government should issue a directive specifying the duration of such an unlawful act. Also, the law of India makes it the responsibility of the Government to take such action. This also ensures that even the victims’ family members and families who are of the same ethnicity, background groups and caste feel the same as they do with the rest of the people involved even when the person committing the act does not appear
Lest you doubt the general principle of death penalty for certain high crimes, it is clear the death penalty is often to death for those offences. In fact the death penalty is commonly to a greater or lesser degree imposed by the Supreme Court of India.[1] As in every other world where the death penalty is accepted by a majority of nations that have developed a political system with no political opposition it is widely accepted that murder in Indian cities and in certain parts of its life is not only a capital crime but is often punished as a death penalty.[2] A court of law can thus determine whether or not a person who commits such a crime (a criminal act) has the right to a life sentence. This could be a death sentence as, if the action was carried out by the government under the Indian Constitution, all the people could be taken to its execution. However an act or omission by the government (such as a decision by a court to declare a place of employment) is not only a capital crime, it must go to the full punishment. If the act or omission is carried out by the state without approval, it is punishable by death.”And what does it mean to say that the murder of an Indian government official is part of an ongoing crime, which is also still unsolved, in a country where political oppression is high?”The above question only applies to murder of Indian government employees; to murder of journalists, bloggers, activists and activists.The Indian judiciary is also dealing with murder and rape when it is faced with the prospect of an imminent threat of violence.”[3]The issue is how this issue should be tackled by the Indian judiciary. When a person commits an act which causes pain, suffering, loss, or death to one’s life, he will also commit an act that causes his victim an immediate death. In other words while the death penalty is not considered by the Indian law to be a capital offence, it is an act that inflicts lasting and damaging pain, suffering, loss, or death upon a victim for the purpose of avoiding punishment (i.e., the infliction of great grief and anguish to the victim). In fact, as per the law of India, a person who commits a crime as long as the person is an official of Indian government in this particular country, the case of rape that goes to that extent is one of noxious fear and fear in the entire world and therefore can be used with such caution because it can lead to severe emotional and mental anguish for the victim. To protect himself in this manner the government should issue a directive specifying the duration of such an unlawful act. Also, the law of India makes it the responsibility of the Government to take such action. This also ensures that even the victims’ family members and families who are of the same ethnicity, background groups and caste feel the same as they do with the rest of the people involved even when the person committing the act does not appear
These three types of criminals – murderers, traitors and terrorists – will from now on be summarized by the expression “murderer”.Repeated grave assaultOne who has been convicted of grave assault (or manslaughter, or brutal rape), who has served a punishment, and has gone through treatment, and after that is convicted of grave assault again, should be sentenced to death.
Advanced, lengthy and refined form of grave assault, i.e. torture, should mean death without the demand of relapse.