The Adversary System – Dissertation – bino_capone
Search
Essays
Sign up
Sign in
Contact us
Tweet
Index
/American History
The Adversary System
The adversary system shouldn’t be considered the most efficient because of cost, time, and waste. The adversarial system used in courts blends with individualism and competition. In an adversary system both sides have equal opportunities to plead their case and criticize the other one. In the most convincing one wins; preferably the “right” one. America’s idea of free market capitalism and competition highly values individualism over collectivism. In going in to court under the adversarial system, there is a winner or loser, unlike in Alternative Dispute Resolution where a compromise can be sought. While a party may “win” in an adversarial system, the costs of taking legal action to both sides may outweigh the benefit. My opinion is that the adversarial system is weak because as the wealthier party has the advantage of hiring a better legal team, while the underdog is limited by his own wealth. I also believe that this flaw in favor of the richer party is inherent in many political and economic issues, as argued in the critical legal studies school, and could be part of our “value” of making the rich even more rich. It also plays a huge part in culture because all ethnicities isn’t treated the same. Many African Americans in the “The Adversary System in Civil Litigation” states, “That’s its essential for judicial system to start playing its part.” So overall, the system done its part but it isn’t the most efficient system. The adversary system shouldn’t be considered the most efficient because of cost, time, and waste. The adversarial system used in courts blends with individualism and competition. In an adversary system both sides have equal opportunities to plead their case and criticize the other one. In the most convincing one wins; preferably the “right” one. America’s idea of free market capitalism and competition highly values individualism over collectivism. In going in to court under the adversarial system, there is a winner or loser, unlike in Alternative Dispute Resolution where a compromise can be sought. While a party may “win” in an adversarial system, the costs of taking legal action to both sides may outweigh the benefit. My opinion is that the adversarial system is weak because as the wealthier party has the advantage of hiring a better legal team, while the underdog is limited by his own wealth. I also believe that this flaw in favor of the richer party is inherent in many political and economic issues, as argued in the critical legal studies school, and could be part of our “value” of making the rich even more rich. It also plays a huge part in culture because all ethnicities isn’t treated the same. Many African Americans in the “The Adversary System in Civil Litigation” states, “That’s its essential for judicial system to start playing its part.” So overall, the system done its part but it isn’t the most efficient system.
The adversary system shouldn’t be considered the most efficient because of cost, time, and waste. The adversarial system used in courts blends with individualism and competition. In an adversary system both sides have equal opportunities to plead their case and criticize the other one. In the most convincing one wins; preferably the “right” one. America’s idea of free market capitalism and competition highly values individualism over collectivism. In going in to court under the adversarial system, there is a winner or loser, unlike in Alternative Dispute Resolution where a compromise can be sought. While a party may “win” in an adversarial system, the costs of taking legal action to both sides may outweigh the benefit. My opinion is that the adversarial system is weak because as the wealthier party has the advantage of hiring a better legal team, while the underdog is limited by his own wealth. I also believe that this flaw in favor of the richer party is inherent in many political and economic issues, as argued in the critical legal studies school, and could be part of our “value” of making the rich even more rich. It also plays a huge part in culture because all ethnicities isn’t treated the same. Many African Americans in the “The Adversary System in Civil Litigation” states, “That’s its essential for judicial system to start playing its part.” So overall, the system done its part but it isn’t the most efficient system. The adversary system shouldn’t be considered the most efficient because of cost, time, and waste. The adversarial system used in courts blends with individualism and competition. In an adversary system both sides have equal opportunities to plead their case and criticize the other one. In the most convincing one wins; preferably the “right” one. America’s idea of free market capitalism and competition highly values individualism over collectivism. In going in to court under the adversarial system, there is a winner or loser, unlike in Alternative Dispute Resolution where a compromise can be sought. While a party may “win” in an adversarial system, the costs of taking legal action to both sides may outweigh the benefit. My opinion is that the adversarial system is weak because as the wealthier party has the advantage of hiring a better legal team, while the underdog is limited by his own wealth. I also believe that this flaw in favor of the richer party is inherent in many political and economic issues, as argued in the critical legal studies school, and could be part of our “value” of making the rich even more rich. It also plays a huge part in culture because all ethnicities isn’t treated the same. Many African Americans in the “The Adversary System in Civil Litigation” states, “That’s its essential for judicial system to start playing its part.” So overall, the system done its part but it isn’t the most efficient system.
Continue for 8 more pages »
Read full document
Download as (for upgraded members)
Citation Generator
MLA 7
CHICAGO
(2018, 02). The Adversary System. EssaysForStudent.com. Retrieved 02, 2018, from
“The Adversary System” EssaysForStudent.com. 02 2018. 2018. 02 2018 <
"The Adversary System." EssaysForStudent.com. EssaysForStudent.com, 02 2018. Web. 02 2018. <
"The Adversary System." EssaysForStudent.com. 02, 2018. Accessed 02, 2018.
Essay Preview
By: bino_capone
Submitted: February 28, 2018
Essay Length: 2,192 Words / 9 Pages
Paper type: Dissertation Views: 329
Report this essay
Tweet
Related Essays
Computer Operating System
Introduction An operating system (OS) is a program that acts an intermediary between a user of a computer and the computer hardware. The purpose of
961 Words  |  4 Pages
Global Postitioning System
Global Postitioning System The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a satellite-based navigation system made up of a network of 24 satellites placed into orbit by
1,060 Words  |  5 Pages
Canadian Legal System
On September 25th, 3:00PM, I attended the Ontario Traffic Courts at 1530 Markham Road. Room E9 is where the trial took place, my trial to
745 Words  |  3 Pages
Computer Systems Analysts
Computer Systems Analysts COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSTS are responsible for designing computer information systems, modifying systems to improve production or work flow, or expanding systems to
1,350 Words  |  6 Pages
Similar Topics
Bead Bar Systems Development Project
Introduction Expert Systems
Get Access to 89,000+ Essays and Term Papers
Join 209,000+ Other Students
High Quality Essays and Documents
Sign up
© 2008–2020 EssaysForStudent.comFree Essays, Book Reports, Term Papers and Research Papers
Essays
Sign up
Sign in
Contact us
Site Map
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Facebook
Twitter