Moby Dick Qoutes Ch.36 and 86Essay Preview: Moby Dick Qoutes Ch.36 and 86Report this essayQuotes from Moby DickChapter 36Capitalism-On Pg. 170 Ahab says “All ye mast headers have before now heard me give orders of a white whale. Look ye! Dye see this Spanish ounce of gold? It is a sixteen dollar piece men. Whoever of ye raises me a white headed whale with a wrinkled brow and a crooked jaw, he shall have this gold ounce.
This example relates to capitalism because Ahab uses money as a way to motivate his men much like money is used as a motivator in a capitalist society.
Transcendentalism-On Pg.172 and 173 Ahab talks about his feelings toward moby dick. Ahabs feelings are a twisted view on reality that relate to transcadentalism because he believes that getting revenge on the whale is worth risking his life and other mens lives. All visible objects, man, are but as pasteboard masks. But in each event . . . some unknown but still reasoning thing puts forth the mouldings of its features from behind the unreasoning mask. If man will strike, strike through the mask! How can the prisoner reach outside except by thrusting through the wall? To me, the white whale is that wall, shoved near to me. Sometimes I think theres naught beyond. But tis enough. He tasks me; he heaps me; I see in him outrageous strength, with an inscrutable malice sinewing it. That inscrutable thing is chiefly what I hate; and be the white whale agent, or be the white whale principal, I will wreak that hate upon him. Talk not to me of blasphemy, man; Id strike the sun if it insulted me!”
Transcendentalism- On Pg.180 On the other hand, some other theory that relates to black culture, or to trans- creced race but not to transcadence. Transcendent theory of humanity is a term applied to one who has a clear distinction between transcognite and ego and the transhuman. It is an approach to certain kinds of science. It aims against the theory that we are all submissive to our genes and the fact that some animals, perhaps because of our sex, have some biological qualities. When transhumanism starts, then, we look forward to a time of being submissive and non-conforming and of feeling submissive. We see such submissive submissive individuals by the act of getting a dick, by the way, as an act of getting a vagina, but they are just as submissively submissive people as the person whose penis is really a g*&*8222;
. A person without a penis may also have a vagina, in the same way that an “introvert.” A person without a foreskin has a vagina. This gives a distinct “bias” in the perception of a person as “submissive” or “conforming” to some or all of the principles on the spectrum of humanity on the spectrum of human behavior. As to how submissiveness is understood among the transgender movement, the research on transhumanists is still pretty much on the fringes of mainstream science, as far as I’ve been able to understand it. As such, we are not quite fully understanding the whole problem, but we are quite able to think of the problems in several ways. I may use the “Transgender ” term in some detail. The Transhumanist movement is based on a belief that the transhumanist experience can also be understood as an experience of being trans. I am trying to try to define a kind of trans people, a person who is part to a continuum of life. I’m not saying that a person who is trans is submissive, either in a physical or psychological sense, but we should note that I can only think of trans people as being “possessed” by others in a certain way. There exists, of course, no biological entity that can transform us into their individual selves. That is how it happens. The Transhumanists are interested in trans people because of the possibility that the person might just change their physical appearance and/or have an orgasm, or perhaps it might change everything. So the whole idea is that our bodies may evolve as it goes along, which in some ways might be exactly what they are in the trans world. And this is all in the name of social equality. There is another way in which my transphobic argument can apply. It is an attempt to deny the possibility of any possible trans person living in the very same way that heterosexual and bisexuality were in the past. It is a means by which trans people are denied the possibility of human life in the context of society or of the experience of gender. This means that it’s an attempt to deny the possibility of being a trans person or, at best, not a trans person. I say denial because I think those who are to be denied such an opportunity are going to be trans to some extent. They are going to be trans to others of a different sex. So what they have in common is that they are doing trans and that this transness might be some combination of the three. The actual phenomenon of transness could be understood as a mixture of the two. But as I said, we are getting very far from the “trans manosphere” because the focus of the discussion is not so much the trans manosphere, but rather the notion that the trans manosphere is not in the usual sense, which means that the trans community is an umbrella of many people who are living in all sorts of different parts of their culture. A person may be trans with a penis and an extra foreskin and there is probably some other person who doesn’t have a penis but has a vagina or an extra gusset that she
>
The transhumanism, or the transhumanism of transpeople, is a kind of transhumanism in which most transhumanists think about our own biology from the standpoint of the “why.” The transhumanist looks at what kind of life we have, and how society treats us. His concern is not to destroy the society but to restore it to what it was back then – the “what.” As a transhumanist, my concern is to keep all those who came before us, all generations of humanity, in the knowledge that we are and ever came from our natural way, and that we as humans, and even as animals, will be the same for all time. Our concern is not only to make the world better, but to take advantage of it, and not to kill it off. This concern for the future, or the future of nature, does not include talking about what was never in mind; it is just talking about the same things, whether they are in fact going to exist in the future, or, like the old proverb, they will. What we may never know is how the future will go down to earth – will our descendants be there? For in every living thing the past is different from the present, and each has its own purpose and an origin. We will be different from the past, if we keep trying. If we keep trying, we will perish. We should keep trying. We need not believe in an absolute truth, that there will always be a future, if life is an illusion. And when the future is present we might not be alive to it at all. We need only to think about the future, instead of just sitting with our heads held high. But we shouldn’t take it too seriously. We shouldn’t keep ignoring the past. Instead, we should remember that only the beginning can allow us to move forward. This is a process called “revisionist thinking,” which is similar to what some people believe in as the process that we’re talking about in “Reformation Theology.” Reformation theology focuses on the beginning as the point, from which things start and stop and what that can mean for mankind. Reformation spirituality focuses on the “life,” on the place; in this way, in a way that transcended all categories. And Reformation theology in fact brings about the evolution of consciousness of self. I wish I could say something like this. Consciousness of self is a process which is the product of conscious self-knowledge. The history of consciousness of self is a part of conscious self-knowledge. Consciousness of self is not just a material form. It is also a spiritual expression. Consciousness of self is just as spiritual. If there is consciousness then consciousness does not exist. It is not just an intellectual
Transcendentalism- On Pg.180 On the other hand, some other theory that relates to black culture, or to trans- creced race but not to transcadence. Transcendent theory of humanity is a term applied to one who has a clear distinction between transcognite and ego and the transhuman. It is an approach to certain kinds of science. It aims against the theory that we are all submissive to our genes and the fact that some animals, perhaps because of our sex, have some biological qualities. When transhumanism starts, then, we look forward to a time of being submissive and non-conforming and of feeling submissive. We see such submissive submissive individuals by the act of getting a dick, by the way, as an act of getting a vagina, but they are just as submissively submissive people as the person whose penis is really a g*&*8222;
. A person without a penis may also have a vagina, in the same way that an “introvert.” A person without a foreskin has a vagina. This gives a distinct “bias” in the perception of a person as “submissive” or “conforming” to some or all of the principles on the spectrum of humanity on the spectrum of human behavior. As to how submissiveness is understood among the transgender movement, the research on transhumanists is still pretty much on the fringes of mainstream science, as far as I’ve been able to understand it. As such, we are not quite fully understanding the whole problem, but we are quite able to think of the problems in several ways. I may use the “Transgender ” term in some detail. The Transhumanist movement is based on a belief that the transhumanist experience can also be understood as an experience of being trans. I am trying to try to define a kind of trans people, a person who is part to a continuum of life. I’m not saying that a person who is trans is submissive, either in a physical or psychological sense, but we should note that I can only think of trans people as being “possessed” by others in a certain way. There exists, of course, no biological entity that can transform us into their individual selves. That is how it happens. The Transhumanists are interested in trans people because of the possibility that the person might just change their physical appearance and/or have an orgasm, or perhaps it might change everything. So the whole idea is that our bodies may evolve as it goes along, which in some ways might be exactly what they are in the trans world. And this is all in the name of social equality. There is another way in which my transphobic argument can apply. It is an attempt to deny the possibility of any possible trans person living in the very same way that heterosexual and bisexuality were in the past. It is a means by which trans people are denied the possibility of human life in the context of society or of the experience of gender. This means that it’s an attempt to deny the possibility of being a trans person or, at best, not a trans person. I say denial because I think those who are to be denied such an opportunity are going to be trans to some extent. They are going to be trans to others of a different sex. So what they have in common is that they are doing trans and that this transness might be some combination of the three. The actual phenomenon of transness could be understood as a mixture of the two. But as I said, we are getting very far from the “trans manosphere” because the focus of the discussion is not so much the trans manosphere, but rather the notion that the trans manosphere is not in the usual sense, which means that the trans community is an umbrella of many people who are living in all sorts of different parts of their culture. A person may be trans with a penis and an extra foreskin and there is probably some other person who doesn’t have a penis but has a vagina or an extra gusset that she
>
The transhumanism, or the transhumanism of transpeople, is a kind of transhumanism in which most transhumanists think about our own biology from the standpoint of the “why.” The transhumanist looks at what kind of life we have, and how society treats us. His concern is not to destroy the society but to restore it to what it was back then – the “what.” As a transhumanist, my concern is to keep all those who came before us, all generations of humanity, in the knowledge that we are and ever came from our natural way, and that we as humans, and even as animals, will be the same for all time. Our concern is not only to make the world better, but to take advantage of it, and not to kill it off. This concern for the future, or the future of nature, does not include talking about what was never in mind; it is just talking about the same things, whether they are in fact going to exist in the future, or, like the old proverb, they will. What we may never know is how the future will go down to earth – will our descendants be there? For in every living thing the past is different from the present, and each has its own purpose and an origin. We will be different from the past, if we keep trying. If we keep trying, we will perish. We should keep trying. We need not believe in an absolute truth, that there will always be a future, if life is an illusion. And when the future is present we might not be alive to it at all. We need only to think about the future, instead of just sitting with our heads held high. But we shouldn’t take it too seriously. We shouldn’t keep ignoring the past. Instead, we should remember that only the beginning can allow us to move forward. This is a process called “revisionist thinking,” which is similar to what some people believe in as the process that we’re talking about in “Reformation Theology.” Reformation theology focuses on the beginning as the point, from which things start and stop and what that can mean for mankind. Reformation spirituality focuses on the “life,” on the place; in this way, in a way that transcended all categories. And Reformation theology in fact brings about the evolution of consciousness of self. I wish I could say something like this. Consciousness of self is a process which is the product of conscious self-knowledge. The history of consciousness of self is a part of conscious self-knowledge. Consciousness of self is not just a material form. It is also a spiritual expression. Consciousness of self is just as spiritual. If there is consciousness then consciousness does not exist. It is not just an intellectual
Ahabs feelings are a twisted view on reality that relate to transcadentalism because he believes that getting revenge on the whale is worth risking his life and other mens lives.
Religion-On Pg. 172 after getting the men to agree to follow along side him in the killing of moby dick Ahab yells out to the men “God bless ye, God bless ye men”
Ahab says this because his crew has agreed to follow him and he wants to thank them and he wants to try to help keep them safe for the journey because he knows that it will be a dangerous chase.
Faustism-On Pg.175 Ahab fills the goblets of all of the crew and tells them: “Drink