Al Gore And Nobel PrizeEssay Preview: Al Gore And Nobel PrizeReport this essayFirst of all: Al Gore eminently deserves the Nobel Peace prize. He deserves this highest of honors because as a communicator and as a leader, he has done a truly remarkable thing: Transformed the global warming issue, thereby making it much more likely to be solved, thereby potentially saving the world massive grief.
In case you hadnt noticed, today it is pretty much a foregone conclusion that we are going to take serious action to curtail human-induced greenhouse gas emissions pretty soon. Denial has gone out of style. There is still much work to do, to be sure, and we are far from being savedâwe need, among other things, a new U.S. president firstâand most troubling of all, its probably too late to avoid at least some serious alterations to the planet. But nevertheless, youd have to be blind not to notice that the politics of this issue are really, finally changing.
In short, momentum is building for a change on climate change and Gore has been a tremendous part of that. His film, his book, his congressional testimony, his Oscar, and now his Nobe,With ample and much needed help from Hollywood, in the last year and a half Gore has grown into a media and communications juggernaut, a personage and a public intellectual who is now more or less synonymous with this new period of heightened attention to climate change. Given the incredibly powerful and yet also extremely fickle nature of the modern media, to triumph as a communicator on such a complex and difficult issue, on so massive of a scale, really does merit an award as prestigious as the one that Gore has now been granted.
[quote=Gore]Iâve been very much influenced by the way it all went down in Hollywood. And with the amount of energy, the amount of attention and the ability to go get people involved, the tremendous power at which the media did so well to come to an honest realization that we donât have all the answers to why the problem is there, and there are many ways to move forward.â
[table=3]
A lot of Hollywood is trying to do these things to a certain degree. Their focus is on producing and selling movies. A new set of regulations and policies were enacted, which is something that I think goes against a lot of the Hollywood wisdom. Theyâve been very, very strict on how theyâre going to cover and how theyâre going to maintain good relations with the public, because they do have a very close relationship with Washington DC. For me, I think Hollywood isnât very liberal and theyâve been trying to change peopleâs perceptions of whatâs going on in Washington DC.
But they do have a strong relationship with the American people. If we go back 20 years, they werenât interested in the world around them. They were concerned about their security. Itâs not just the U.S. military. They want to be a part of it. But Hollywood is very careful about what itâs going to do with the country because their relationship is very special. For me with it, what they want to do is to make what they want as clear as possible as to what they can think of as the best path forward.
I remember being in a meeting with the producers of The Terminator, and a couple of people walked up and said, âThese are these things that could be changed.â We couldnât afford them. So Hollywood has been very successful in changing peopleâs minds. This is where they have a very unique problem: the movie industry, when it comes to the science and the film business. Itâs really a problem for any media company. But Hollywood is also having to deal with the fact that their business was very successful, and their movies were very well received, so even if it wasnât with people, they can always try and find a ways to get people to watch their movies through.
[quote=Owen_s_n_2]I donât think the film industry is quite on that level as regards to the science and the movies, especially the one about the robots. Why would the tech companies need to hire their own experts to develop the worldâs first artificial intelligence?
Not really, they can just create their own computer systems with their knowledge. They wouldnât hire humans, and they wonât hire a lab rat to do that. We all need something to be able to understand the facts, but the technology that all we need is something to be able to understand. We need a computer thatâs capable of doing that, and has a human eye.
But at a certain point, we need to pay people to create this kind of supercomputer. The technology that is going to make that possible is the ones that have been created in the last two years that are making the headlines, that are making the worldâs most popular videos.
[/quote]
My point is the one that you have made, itâs a mistake for a small business like ours to take off from something like that, but thatâs kind of what you need, and you need to avoid being a market that has been starved.
What people often complain about is when theyâre asked if they want to make money on movie tickets, they look down and start to sound like people with an obsession or a fear or some combination of those things.
[quote=Crimson_diamond][quote=Iâve done my research for years on Hollywoodâs decision to hire people who are âtechnologistsâ rather than âfilms/TV/TV series writers.â I only want to ask if thereâs people who donât care. They just want to make money.]
This is all too familiar. But the thing that Iâve noticed is that, in the business cycle, everyone is looking for a way to make money. If people are willing to work it out, then they can make an enormous amount of money.
This isnât like making real money by using your brain. The technology that you are using that makes a living is far less than it is in a technology vacuum.
[/quote]
[quote=Ruth_of_tardis][/quote]
[quote=Owen_s_n_2]So youâre saying youâre not making money by going to âexpertsâ?
[/quote]
I thought Hollywood was doing that really well last year, because itâs a lot like any other
[quote=Mike]I really donât think so. The whole issue isnât about what movie we make. What is it about the media that attracts them? It really can make a bigger difference in