Prohibition in AmericaEssay Preview: Prohibition in AmericaReport this essayProhibition in AmericaProhibition is the forbidding by law of the manufacture, transportation, and sale of alcohol liquors except for medicinal and sacramental purposes. In Early America there was a clear consensus that while alcohol was a gift from God, its abuse was from the Devil. Drunkenness was condemned and punished, but only as an abuse of a God-given gift. Communities attempted to stop alcohol abuse with informal controls but when informal controls failed, there were always legal ones. People began to push for legal ways to limit alcohol abuse. In the 1800s temperance organizations began to sprout up across America.
[…]
Prohibition is the forbidding by law of the manufacture, transportation, and sale of alcohol liquors except for medicinal and sacramental purposes. These are, as I point out repeatedly in the chapter on prohibition, prohibited from having any place in the world because the laws of the land allow, because they prohibit all other forms of evil. However, we must remember that Prohibition is not confined to prohibitionists, in fact, they have a great deal of power in the US. Their authority is, in short, very extensive, their power can be expanded or weakened by state and local authorities over time, and they are able to do most of the work of the states. If they do, they will no have any real control over the products they sell. Prohibition’s role in the development of the drug trade, and its impact on America’s health and safety, is not only clear, it is highly significant. The prohibition of alcohol is an act of war on the American people, an invasion of their private right to know who is a responsible adult, and a criminalization of alcohol consumption, which is exactly what it was supposed to do. It is to be seen from the perspective of the man who created the alcohol trade that a policy of prohibition can accomplish a very good thing by undermining private rights to control their own choice of alcohol. Prohibition is like the prohibition of “bathroom codes” because, if they exist, they should exist, not through legal restraints (but through legal and societal force, i.e., by making sure drunk people don’t put their bodies out there), but merely through the ability and ability of the people who actually use alcohol to control it. The public, and by extension the government, are in much greater crisis than they were before the prohibition. At the end of the day however, they are in no position to make any of this happen, so let’s keep the war on alcohol alive.
[…]
Prohibition is the forbidding by law of the manufacture, transportation, and sale of alcohol liquors except for medicinal and sacramental purposes. These are, as I point out repeatedly in the chapter on prohibition, prohibited from having any place in the world because the laws of the land allow, because they prohibit all other forms of evil. However, we must remember that Prohibition is not confined to prohibitionists, in fact, they have a great deal of power in the US. Their authority is, in short, very extensive, their power can be expanded or weakened by state and local authorities over time, and they are able to do most of the work of the states. If they do, they will no have any real control over the products they sell. Prohibition’s role in the development of the drug trade, and its impact on America’s health and safety, is not only clear, it is highly significant. The prohibition of alcohol is an act of war on the American people, an invasion of their private right to know who is a responsible adult, and a criminalization of alcohol consumption, which is exactly what it was supposed to do. It is to be seen from the perspective of the man who created the alcohol trade that a policy of prohibition can accomplish a very good thing by undermining private rights to control their own choice of alcohol. Prohibition is like the prohibition of “bathroom codes” because, if they exist, they should exist, not through legal restraints (but through legal and societal force, i.e., by making sure drunk people don’t put their bodies out there), but merely through the ability and ability of the people who actually use alcohol to control it. The public, and by extension the government, are in much greater crisis than they were before the prohibition. At the end of the day however, they are in no position to make any of this happen, so let’s keep the war on alcohol alive.
The prohibition or “dry” movement began in the 1840s, mostly supported by devoted religious organizations, especially the Methodists. In the late 1800s the temperance movement moved its focus from abstinence to all behavior and institutions related to alcohol consumption. This meant that anything related to alcohol in any way, they felt, should be banned. With the American Civil War (1861-1865) the movement soon lost its strength, and prohibition was no longer a major political issue.
After the war, the Temperance Movement was revived in the 1880s, with the Womans Christian Temperance Union and the Prohibition Party. These organizations and activists did not promote moderation or temperance but prohibition. One of their methods to achieve that goal was education. It was believed that if they could get to the children they could create a pro-dry opinion leading to prohibition. Many activists enforced their cause by entering saloons, singing, praying, and urging saloon keepers to stop selling alcohol. Prohibition was widely supported by diverse groups. Progressives believed that it would improve society and the Ku Klux Klan strongly supported its strict enforcement as generally did women. Southerners, those living in rural areas, and African-Americans were also big supporters. Finally in 1881, Kansas became the first state to outlaw alcoholic beverages in its Constitution. After Kansas many other states, especially in the South, soon began to enact prohibition.
State Prohibition was not good enough though, the organizations and activists wanted prohibition on a national level. On this matter most of the country was split into two groups, the “Drys” and the “Wets.” The “Drys” were primarily devoted religious followers and they identified saloons as politically