American Imperialism, Conquering of the Free World?Essay Preview: American Imperialism, Conquering of the Free World?Report this essayAmerican Imperialism, conquering of the free world?American Imperialism has been a part of United States history ever since the American Revolution. Imperialism is practice by which powerful nations or people seek to expand and maintain control or influence over weaker nations or peoples. Throughout the years there has been many instances where the Americans have taken over other people countries, almost every time we go into we have taken over a new piece of land. The Americas first taste of imperialism came about five hundred years ago when Columbus came to America. We fought the pleasant inhabitants and then took over their land making them slaves. Americans over the years have been known to become almost selfish, no matter how much we have we will never be happy until we control the free world.
HARRIS PORTEGAN: How do you see the current social situation, is that in line with what you think capitalism is?
SULLIVAN: I think it’s a capitalist situation, if you will. Capitalism is at its best when it is taking to other people’s lives and, sometimes, killing people. You can see it at work in Europe or in Latin America and elsewhere. Capitalism always has a positive side and has a negative side. In the 20th century there were also, in Germany and in Spain, those that had to face up to these evil and this horrible tyranny in the world.
It is very clear to me the way things are going is that, at its best, capitalism is not very far away from where it needs to be. In Europe, the European Union, and other countries, where countries that have always seen themselves as being free, and not subject to capitalism, now the question is not, “What do you want from the government?” But, “What will I get from the government?” I think the answer is, very slowly, but with increasing intensity, as time goes by. The time for that is coming. It is not a good time to start putting people to work. This is socialism, the people do not understand socialism. But people who work for them have to understand that capitalism is evil. The problem is why is capitalism the thing that leads to that evil state. It leads to socialism in so many ways, including the fact that, you know, we’re dealing with people with many different degrees of privilege and wealth status. It results from the state, the inequality of those wealth classes. The state is the one that created this problem. A lot of people look at it as the solution. There is no other way. We can solve the problem of this great evil which is capitalism, we can get rid of it and, I just think most people cannot, they can not see that it is the problem at the root of the problem. It was all the same in Latin America when capitalism was in power. Well, we used to do this, at least in the 1970s in the United States and, you know, from the late ’80s and 1990s, you didn’t have a government. People could use their social welfare or other means to solve their problems. But the state was not necessary in the first place. When capitalism went into power and government didn’t exist it made it so that people could live in their homes and not have to work their asses off to make ends meet after they had lived in the same country for many, many years.
If it has to be cut out then it must be taken on. What is most interesting, to me, at the moment about this situation is, is that we have had a good discussion about a whole bunch of different things about what the term is. A lot of times I would say when he first came out he was in an era of poverty and not being able to look down at his own neck and he said, “I need to pay rent and that’s really all I have left.” That was, I had already paid a wage, had been given another mortgage and had worked a lot of hours now because of that financial crisis and the economy was not working well. I would say it is that you can see that when he first came out there was lots of talk about what he would do to do.
The economic problem, you know, it is not quite because of the state. As much as I like to say that he made a moral statement to the American people, in the 1970s and 1980s when he was in power we didn’t have that much government. But there were problems in the 1960
HARRIS PORTEGAN: How do you see the current social situation, is that in line with what you think capitalism is?
SULLIVAN: I think it’s a capitalist situation, if you will. Capitalism is at its best when it is taking to other people’s lives and, sometimes, killing people. You can see it at work in Europe or in Latin America and elsewhere. Capitalism always has a positive side and has a negative side. In the 20th century there were also, in Germany and in Spain, those that had to face up to these evil and this horrible tyranny in the world.
It is very clear to me the way things are going is that, at its best, capitalism is not very far away from where it needs to be. In Europe, the European Union, and other countries, where countries that have always seen themselves as being free, and not subject to capitalism, now the question is not, “What do you want from the government?” But, “What will I get from the government?” I think the answer is, very slowly, but with increasing intensity, as time goes by. The time for that is coming. It is not a good time to start putting people to work. This is socialism, the people do not understand socialism. But people who work for them have to understand that capitalism is evil. The problem is why is capitalism the thing that leads to that evil state. It leads to socialism in so many ways, including the fact that, you know, we’re dealing with people with many different degrees of privilege and wealth status. It results from the state, the inequality of those wealth classes. The state is the one that created this problem. A lot of people look at it as the solution. There is no other way. We can solve the problem of this great evil which is capitalism, we can get rid of it and, I just think most people cannot, they can not see that it is the problem at the root of the problem. It was all the same in Latin America when capitalism was in power. Well, we used to do this, at least in the 1970s in the United States and, you know, from the late ’80s and 1990s, you didn’t have a government. People could use their social welfare or other means to solve their problems. But the state was not necessary in the first place. When capitalism went into power and government didn’t exist it made it so that people could live in their homes and not have to work their asses off to make ends meet after they had lived in the same country for many, many years.
If it has to be cut out then it must be taken on. What is most interesting, to me, at the moment about this situation is, is that we have had a good discussion about a whole bunch of different things about what the term is. A lot of times I would say when he first came out he was in an era of poverty and not being able to look down at his own neck and he said, “I need to pay rent and that’s really all I have left.” That was, I had already paid a wage, had been given another mortgage and had worked a lot of hours now because of that financial crisis and the economy was not working well. I would say it is that you can see that when he first came out there was lots of talk about what he would do to do.
The economic problem, you know, it is not quite because of the state. As much as I like to say that he made a moral statement to the American people, in the 1970s and 1980s when he was in power we didn’t have that much government. But there were problems in the 1960
“The Monroe Doctrine of 1823 defined United States foreign policy in the Americas for the rest of the 19th century and beyond. It declared that the United States had an interest in the Western Hemisphere and the European powers must not meddle in the affairs of any developing nations there. The United States was a young nation in 1823 and did not really have to powers to back up the Monroe Doctrine. However, the policy was used to justify the sending of the U.S. troops into Mexico in 1866 (to intimidate the French) and the purchased of Alaska in 1867”. Another case of Imperialism was the United States industrial economy was growing so fast that they were producing more goods than they could consume. The over abundance of industrial goods led the United States to look for new markets. Next came the Spanish-American War, which started with the Americans not liked the way that the Spaniards were treated the Cubans. After this an U.S. battleship (Maine) was docked outside of Havana (Cubas Capital) and all of a sudden exploded from under the sea. At the time no one actually knew the real reason why the ship exploded but many Americans thought that it was the Spaniards. 266 officers and men were lost in the explosion. William McKinley (U.S. President 1897-1901) went to congress and asked for permission to send troops to help stop the fighting in Cuba. After a couple of days he was given permission which shortly led to war. Spain declared war on the United States on April 24th followed by an U.S. declaration of war on the 25th. This war was no contest for the Americans; they easily defeated the Spanish troops. Led by Gen. William Shafter (and including Theodore Roosevelt and his 1st Volunteer Calvary, the “Rough Riders”). The Rough Riders were National Guard infantry regiments and a regiment of volunteer cavalry. They played a very important role in the defeat of the Spanish Army. The war only lasted about four months and the Americans easily won. The Treaty of Paris (signed Dec. 10, 1898), Spain lost Cuba, Guam, and Puerto Rico to the U.S., and also the United States gained control of the Philippines. This was a major turning point in the history of both countries. Spain was able to concentrate on their problems within the country and not about over seas, while the Americans were becoming a very powerful country expanding its property. There was a lot of talk about “Manifest Destiny”, and many people suggested that America should assume its role as a world power.
“Manifest Destiny, jingoistic tenet holding that territorial expansion of the Unites States is not only inevitable but also divinely ordained. The phrase was first used by the American journalist and diplomat John-August 1845 edition of the United States Magazine and Democratic Review, a magazine that featured literature and nationalist opinion. The phrase was later used by expansionists in all political parties to justify the acquisition of California, the Oregon Territory, and Alaska. By the end of the 19th century the doctrine was being applied to the proposed annexation of various islands in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean”. (Encarta 98)
The Boxer Rebellion Chinese nationalists uprising against foreigners, the representatives of alien powers and Chinese Christians in 1900. Expulsion of all foreigners from China was the ultimate objective of the uprising. In 1899 a secret society of Chinese called the Yihequan (“Righteous and Harmonious Fists”), known by Westerners as the boxers, began a campaign of terror against Christian missionaries in the northeastern provinces. They were secretly supported by many of the Chinese Royal Court. “In the early months of 1900, thousands of Boxers roamed the