An Analysis of the Cognitive Ability of Self-Regulation
Join now to read essay An Analysis of the Cognitive Ability of Self-Regulation
Running head: SELF REGULATION AND REAPPRAISAL
An Analysis of the Cognitive Ability of Self-Regulation
Fred D.Winter & Charity N. Dugas
Southwestern University
Abstract
Utilizing the cognitive process of self-regulation, humans can handle negative emotions through the mental process of reappraisal. New research conducted by Oschner (2001) using an fMRI scan, indicate that there is significant brain activity in the prefrontal cortex during reappraisal. Utilizing these findings as an indicator of reappraisal, this study will examine if emotional reappraisal can be learned. Experimenters will elicit an emotional response from the participants by showing them two horrific scenes, and then measuring the type of emotional regulation observed, through the fMRI and a survey. It is hypothesized that those participants who have experienced a singular traumatizing event in recent memory will reappraise more than those who have not. This study is important for research because it examines the possibility of a learned emotional response.
Humans stand apart from animals in that they can actively regulate their cognitive processes in a manner that can inhibit certain emotions. For instance, humans have the important ability to selectively inhibit their aggressive, sexual, and socially un-acceptable behavior. Bjorklund and Harnishleger (1995) explain in a review that human inhibition has played a central role in the evolution of the changing human mind for it has allowed for greater social cohesion and harmony. Instead of succumbing to primal impulses, humans can hold themselves back and in turn, self-regulate.
Self-regulation of the mind can take several forms, yet an important facet of self-regulation is that humans have the ability to change the way we feel about specific situations. Being emotional beings, having the ability to hold sway over where our emotions lead us is important for both our mental and physical health. For instance, to use a physical health example, people who have serious illnesses can improve their health and live longer by adopting a hopeful outlook on their situation and treatment, versus those who adopt a negative outlook might deteriorate faster. To use a mental health example, humans can fight back the feelings of nausea and sickness after seeing a disturbing image, just like a doctor is able to look at someone profusely bleeding on an operating table and reassess that the person is a patient in need of help.
This type of emotion regulation is commonly known as reappraisal, a reinterpretation of a potentially emotional situation in a way that neutralizes its emotional impact (Richards, 2001). Several studies have looked into the dynamics of this cognitive self-regulation.
Reappraisal is an interesting process because it stems from an individual’s ability to control a conscious response. Barrett and Salovey (2001) found that individual differences in psychological resilience predict different outcomes in emotional regulation. In other words, those that could successfully bounce back from negative emotional experiences and were flexibly adaptive to changing situational demands exhibited a higher ability to positively reappraise a potentially self-esteem destructive situation (Barrett and Salovey, 2001). Specifically, their study refers to an individual ability to deal with and cope with negativity in general.
In a study titled the “Cognitive Consequences of Concealing Feelings”, Richards (2001) noted that when individuals did not re-appraise, but instead suppressed their emotional response, there were consequences on cognitive ability. Suppression directly refers to the conscious inhibition of emotion-expressive behavior (2001). In his words “although these self-monitoring and self-corrective processes [suppression] may permit us to conceal feelings successfully, they could end up diverting finite attention resources from other things we could be doing at the same time” (Richards, 2001). In short, suppressing a natural emotional response was demonstrated to interfere with memory, communicative discourse, and problem solving. For instance, participants instructed to refrain from an emotional response to a startling image while also being told detailed info about each image as it was displayed, exhibited a significantly lower retention of the information told. On the other hand, in the same study it was found that when the individual simply reinterpreted