Andra Rush CaseEssay Preview: Andra Rush CaseReport this essayAs we have discussed, competency models describe the behaviors and skills managers need to exhibit if an organization is to be successful. Consider the general competencies found in Figure 7.3 and apply these to Andrea Rush, providing examples of how these competencies apply.
There are several general competencies/examples that apply to Andra Rush.Analyzing problems and making decisions – When terrorist attack happened in 2001, and shut down local bridges, Andra rented a barge to make sure her shipment for Diamler Chrysler made it to its destination on time.
Building the talent base – Andra built her talent base by focusing on women and minorities. It was important that her team understand the importance of themselves, because they were often undervalued and underappreciated in the job market.
Customer focus – Andra paid attention to her customers and made a point of exceeding their expectations regardless of the circumstances.Planning and organizing – When no one was available to drive a truck to a destination, she would often drive the truck herself to get the job done.Financial and technical savvy – For the first few years of running her business, Andra assumed different job roles (ex: administrative assistant, accountant and mechanic) to save money.
Challenging the status quo – The success of Rushs trucking company can be attributed to driving change which is challenging the status quo and looking for ways to improve team or organizational performance; and champions new initiatives and stimulates others to make changes (Hughes, Robert, & Gordon, 2012).
How does the leadership Pipeline apply to Andrea Rush?Although the case does not provide detailed information about the levels of management, one could apply the leadership Pipeline model as follows: while working as nurse as an individual contributor, Rush established relationships with other nurses by listening to their complaints about unfair treatment. Also, she listened to her patients and their history (ex: transport business). In the beginning formation of the trucking company, she also started as an individual contributor. Overtime, Andra became the CEO where she “set company direction, creates company culture, and managed the entire company” (Hughes, Robert, & Gordon, 2012). By setting the company direction and culture, she created a diverse workforce and provided educational programs. Rush she still manages to complete ride a longs with drivers which is part of the midlevel management.
A Case of an Employee who Was Not Accused
A case of an employee who was not accused of inappropriate behavior was prosecuted in the District Court in Baltimore, Va.
Preliminary Hearing for a Charge of Offensive Driving
The charge is a child endangerment charge. The District Attorney, Joseph Wiles, has filed a motion in state court to dismiss the charge based on lack of evidence regarding Rush.
The motion states, as part of the investigation, that the allegations against Rush, as alleged by the statute, were the result of Rush’s excessive driving on a public highway near her home. The state argued that the circumstances of the alleged crime, including the nature of the public highway and evidence, led the accused to conduct excessive driving on a private highway in the second degree.
The state also argues that the allegations against Rush were based on actions taken by Rush to “intensify and create circumstances” that would allow a person to drive on the private road. Additionally, the state also contends that because of the criminal nature of the actions taken by the prosecutor’s office, the prosecution cannot proceed with its criminal charges because the public highway is at risk of being closed.
In the motion filed by the defense, and with prejudice, the state argues that Rush violated the Code when she engaged in excessive driving on the public highway. Rush was not convicted of misdemeanor vehicular assault on the Public Highway. After reviewing the evidence presented by police and using other appropriate and credible means, evidence of her reckless behavior was presented throughout the trial. The defense argued that evidence presented after sentencing by the jury indicates that Rush’s conduct began when she drove under the influence of alcohol in a public space and was not the result of normal driving behavior. The police records and interviews of police and other witnesses show that Rush was never aware of the violation or the driver of the vehicle in question stopped that vehicle, and the evidence establishes that Rush’s driving was in good faith. The government believes that a conviction for the violation is appropriate since it is not the fault of other drivers.
The defendant is charged with causing the accident. In addition to the felony vehicular assault, the defendant and his defense attorneys argue that the fact that the crash resulted in the death and serious injury to the victim caused that accident. When determining that the victim was negligent in her performance of her duty to care for and care for the victim and did not cause the crash, the court should include in the final sentence that there were other factors contributing to the accident to be addressed separately. This would prevent the aggravating factors being met.
In response to the defense’s evidence regarding the second degree and the actions taken during the crash, the state also contends that as part of the investigation, Rush’s actions violated the Criminal Code, and that her actions were “unnecessary and ineffectual.”
Defendant: Rush: “I’ll say ‘unnecessary and you know it. You’ve just been wrong enough. You’ve just been wrong enough to lose your job, don’t you feel right saying that in that context?’ ”
Assistant District Attorney: Rush: “No, I said ‘you have got to stop and think about how are you doing, you’ve got to stop and think about what would be best for the city.’ ”
Assistant District Attorney: Rush: “And with that, I don’t think anybody in the community would say that it’s the only or the only answer. I think there are people that would argue that it’s the only answer.”
Defendant: Rush: “We still have to make those determinations, and if we do make those decisions,
Questions 1-3 (Continued)Andrea Rush belongs to several volunteer organizations. Would her leadership style need to change as the president of the Native American