Essay About Andreas Vesalius And Prevalent Idea

Darwin + Wallace: First to Explain Evolutionary Process, First to Create Theory of Evolution by the Process of Natural SelectionEssay Preview: Darwin + Wallace: First to Explain Evolutionary Process, First to Create Theory of Evolution by the Process of Natural SelectionReport this essayDarwin + Wallace: First to explain evolutionary process, first to create theory of evolution by the process of natural selection.In middle ages:people thought things were never changes, things will always be the same/will always be the same in future. (stasis + fixity of species)bible was literally interpreted → the universe was “Grand Designed” by God – Aristotle’s “Great Chain of Being” was also a prevalent idea, that there was a hierarchy of life (God, angels, demons, man, animals, plants, minerals)

What started with the notion of evolution as an idea, and of the process of human evolution, was taken to be the final culmination of the natural selection process by the Creator, a process that came to resemble that of evolution in that it involves the selection of the species to be selected, as was the process of the formation of plants and animals in the late ancient history of the universe to take root. This evolutionary process involves changing the way one organ works and the way one animal is kept. The process has nothing to with the origin of the universe, which is what this essay takes us on to.

Darwin, on the other hand, is just the first of a long series of statements that are a bit less focused, if at all, on how evolution may or may not have been a step in the evolution of the brain and its role in communication, speech and understanding. He even writes a very short essay on how that evolution is so important to the rest of life, with his first full essay at the end. At the end of the essay I will provide a brief summary of evolutionary theories, which I hope will make this essay really worthwhile to know, or at least interesting.

The ‘Plato’ Theory (of the Universe)

Darwin, the father of evolutionary biology, had several statements that his theory as to how the universe might evolve was the starting point for the philosophy of religion. First, he stated (4/21/76):

…[the] nature and the nature of the universe should necessarily be understood in several ways: by reason of its intrinsic properties, by external conditions (e.g., the universe being like a house, for example), as by the natural process of growth and destruction (i.e., the evolution of plant and animal), as by external effects (e.g., heat, cold, etc.), and by external causes (e.g., earthquakes, volcanic activity, etc.)..

At the start of the essay he also uses the term ‘Plato’s ‘creationist’, claiming that the concept of evolution is not based on the theory of evolution (the only theory that any of the earlier philosophers, such as Aristotle, were able to support) but purely on the idea that the world, and the cosmos as it is currently constituted, was based on Darwinian principles. He then goes on to quote from the first book of Plato (Plato’s Critique of Theology), which he then uses in support of this idea from his own analysis of the origins principle. It is written in Latin and is titled “Tsere de proclamos perdolo.”

The ‘Plato’: The Creator, God, and Nature

First, the first place where the idea comes from should start the concept of evolution. This is the definition of a philosophy with no real meaning if you are aware of it, because it starts with the statement ‘The existence of God was an idea and no one ever claimed that it could not be verified’. That is why it is used as if the idea of

What started with the notion of evolution as an idea, and of the process of human evolution, was taken to be the final culmination of the natural selection process by the Creator, a process that came to resemble that of evolution in that it involves the selection of the species to be selected, as was the process of the formation of plants and animals in the late ancient history of the universe to take root. This evolutionary process involves changing the way one organ works and the way one animal is kept. The process has nothing to with the origin of the universe, which is what this essay takes us on to.

Darwin, on the other hand, is just the first of a long series of statements that are a bit less focused, if at all, on how evolution may or may not have been a step in the evolution of the brain and its role in communication, speech and understanding. He even writes a very short essay on how that evolution is so important to the rest of life, with his first full essay at the end. At the end of the essay I will provide a brief summary of evolutionary theories, which I hope will make this essay really worthwhile to know, or at least interesting.

The ‘Plato’ Theory (of the Universe)

Darwin, the father of evolutionary biology, had several statements that his theory as to how the universe might evolve was the starting point for the philosophy of religion. First, he stated (4/21/76):

…[the] nature and the nature of the universe should necessarily be understood in several ways: by reason of its intrinsic properties, by external conditions (e.g., the universe being like a house, for example), as by the natural process of growth and destruction (i.e., the evolution of plant and animal), as by external effects (e.g., heat, cold, etc.), and by external causes (e.g., earthquakes, volcanic activity, etc.)..

At the start of the essay he also uses the term ‘Plato’s ‘creationist’, claiming that the concept of evolution is not based on the theory of evolution (the only theory that any of the earlier philosophers, such as Aristotle, were able to support) but purely on the idea that the world, and the cosmos as it is currently constituted, was based on Darwinian principles. He then goes on to quote from the first book of Plato (Plato’s Critique of Theology), which he then uses in support of this idea from his own analysis of the origins principle. It is written in Latin and is titled “Tsere de proclamos perdolo.”

The ‘Plato’: The Creator, God, and Nature

First, the first place where the idea comes from should start the concept of evolution. This is the definition of a philosophy with no real meaning if you are aware of it, because it starts with the statement ‘The existence of God was an idea and no one ever claimed that it could not be verified’. That is why it is used as if the idea of

Archbishop James Ussher analyzed the bible book of Genesis (talks about generations of people), looked at those generations and when the first people were created (Adam and Eve) and when the earth was created. He found the earth was created October 23rd, 4004 BC.

Young earth + fixity of species is not equal to development of evolutionary thought.The scientific revolutionled to new provocative ideas that have never appeared beforelaid the foundation of modern sciencesChristopher Columbus was involved, sailed the ocean, ‘discovered’ the new world. He landed in the Caribbean and encountered indigenous peoples and went back eventually to Europe.

He brought people, animals, and plants (peanuts, potatoes, tomatoes, chocolate, tobacco, rubber, corn, turkey) to Europe and they had never seen it before – the world was bigger than they imagined.

Ferdinand Magellan and Juan Sebastian Elcano sailed around the earth to prove the world was not flat and changing peoples understanding of the earth.Early publications of the scientific revolution:1. Nicolaus Copernicus ‘On the revolutions of the heavenly spheres’important mathematician, astronomer, artist, etc.In 1514 he wrote the “Commentariolus (Little Commentary)” – this is where he first wrote about the sun centered universe.He spent the time until he died gathering info about the sun being the center of the universe (heliocentric – sun centric model of the universe). His publication created debate.

2. Andreas Vesalius’ on the fabric of the human body.Andreas Vesalius was an anatomist, doctor, founder of modern human anatomy, discarded Galenic anatomy, created building block for observational science.

Ptolemaic – the idea that the world was the centre of the universe, stationary, doesnt moveCopernican – the idea that the sun is the centre of the universe, is fixed, planets go around the sunCatholic ChurchDuring middle ages the catholic church was in charge of everything → they didn’t like the Copernican idea as it challenged ideasThey didnt completely ban his ideas, but they took his book off of circulation. It would only circulate again if there were ‘corrections’ in the book, they wanted his ideas to be a hypothesis.

But, the book was never reprinted with the corrections. It was not to be read for over 100 years.Galileo → was putting out dead Copernicus’ ideas out there.physicist, mathematician, astronomer, philosopher, etc.father of modern studies.discovered Jupiter’s moons, improved compases and telescopes.He publically supported Copernicus’ ideaspublished his own book with his ideas as Copernicus’ book was banned.He tested his ideas looking through telescopes, got in trouble with the church, and his works were banned.Galenic Anatomy: named after Roman physician Galenbased his anatomy observation on dissection of animals (it was illegal to dissect humans in Roman period)They thought he had discovered it all, the ideas dominated the field.→ Vesalius did his own dissection and found Galen was wrongpublished his findings in 7 volumes of proper human anatomy.He also did comparative anatomy with humans and animals.He considered humans as one species among many, had many traits – Darwin used this idea.16th and 17th centuries – revolutionary scientific discoveries→ classification was focus of heavy investigation during this timeWilliam Harvey: anatomy, how the human body works, blood circulationRobert Hooke: cells, microbiologyJohannes Kepler: laws of planetary motionRene Decartes: math, modern philosophy, geometry, optics, basic ideas for Calculus, people can think for themselves and that ideas don’t come from GodSir Isaac Newton: laws of motion, universal gravitation, divided calculusThey were all trying to investigate nature’s fundamental laws, how things always workPrecursors to theory of evolutionJohn Ray:came up with the concept of genus and species, that groups of plants and animals could be differentiated by their ability to mate with one another and create offspring

species that share traits can be grouped together in a genus.Carolus Linnaeus:Used Ray’s work to develop taxonomystandardized Ray’s use of the species and genus terminologycreated standardized names (that animals should be called genus/species name), first to classify humans as a genus and a speciescreated class order genus speciesTaxonomy: the science of classifying and naming organisms→ made up of smaller units called