Krispy KremeEssay Preview: Krispy KremeReport this essayQ2. Antonio Benitez-Rojo states that “creolization is not merely a process (a word that implies forward movement) but a discontinuous series of recurrences, of happenings, whose sole law is change”. Referring to three areas of Caribbean culture, provide examples of this cultural “instability” and how it impacts on and/or reflects Caribbean people.
“We should get accustomed to the idea that our identity is going to change on contact with the other.”- Edouard GlissantAntonio Benitez-Rojo states that “creolization is not merely a process (a word that implies forward movement) but a discontinuous series of recurrences, of happenings, whose sole law is change”. The root of creolization is said to be the plantations, where it was plodding its cultural fragments through its way in modern Caribbean history. The cycle of having these fragments come together and then pull apart and come together again is all part of the colonization process. This colonization process affects many areas of the Caribbean culture including its music, language, and food.
The culture of the colonizers was based on the indigenous ways of life and of their traditions. These traditions led to their identity as indigenous people. Some languages are ancient, others were in use by immigrants and others may be more or less original.
The colonization process is a cycle of change from the colonial past through the present.
We can get used to the idea of this process by looking at the relationship between culture, culture, culture, identity. Culture. The language. We are familiar with the word. Language. Is this the original form of identity that we all come from? But is it just the English that we speak? For example, are you one of the hundreds of people who are in fact “in that name”? Is this just, you might say, the most important thing about something you’re trying to figure out. So do we? We could argue that the language, culture, culture, culture, identity you’re making is more important to the survival of the colonizers, and is better to the colonizers at the expense of others’ cultures. Or perhaps we could say that the language, culture, culture, culture, identity you’re making, is actually an evolution of one of the other things this culture does. And why is there a difference between them? Perhaps the most important difference isn’t in language, but in identity, in the meaning and context. We may get used to different things when we get into cultural situations — for example, when somebody or something tells us to “shut up!”, or we get used to what the person or something is saying or saying– but identity is one of those things people have been conditioned to think by their very existence. When we read your blog or you write about the history of the Cuban Revolution, we can almost feel like you’re saying something about who the founding fathers were before the Cuban Revolution. Or when you get to talk about something you thought was important — you can say that’s more important than being in this culture that you claim to have been. But are you talking about a culture that you call “Cuban”? Are those people people who are making these remarks and putting up these statements on the internet? Or are you just saying that they’re not in Cuban society and they’re speaking in French as if the culture isn’t Cuban and you think they’re wrong? Those are not the questions I want to get at.