The Assassination of Julius CaesarEssay title: The Assassination of Julius CaesarThe Assassination of Julius CaesarJulius Caesar (100 – 44 B.C.) was a very gifted and also a motivated leader. He was appointed dictator of Rome for ten years after he defeated the Senates forces. Some of the senators, such as Marcus Junius Brutus and Gaius Cassuis, who he had previously been pardoned, feared that Julius Caesar aimed to establish a monarchy over Rome with himself as the absolute ruler (king). The Romans despised the word king because it went against their belief of being free citizens of a century old republic. Julius Caesar’s life came to an end on March 15, 44 B.C., when about sixty senators attacked and beat him to death.
Although, the city was being run well by Caesar, he was going against the old tradition of the Democracy of the citizens of Rome. He clearly is a proponent of a Democracy for Rome. Both of these leaders were assassinated while they were doing positive things for their people and country. He says that, Democracy has a fair-appearing name and conveys the impression of bringing equal rights to all through equal laws and that Monarchy, on the contrary, has an unpleasant sound, but is the most practical form of government. He backs up this point by stating that if Democracy indeed does work, Cassius and Brutus would have never murdered Julius Caesar. I think that Rome would have been better off with Caesar as its ruler, because
It took only 12 years for the people to get to the point of doing it.
Senator John F. Kennedy’s Presidential address during the U.S. Congress gave us a classic example of what Senator Kennedy could do. When he was speaking a few years before his assassination, Senator Kennedy expressed his concern about the loss of democracy in the United States. Kennedy said that Democracy is necessary because the U.S. government is not always able to help the people. His concerns about a strong Democracy also came back to haunt his Democratic opponent on the 2004 presidential election, John Kerry—who, as it should be noted, had to be cast as a villain in an effort to unseat George W. Bush. He did not believe that democracy was necessary and had to be crushed.
While our country could now be doing great things for its people, I do not believe that our government should be making any changes. I do not believe that any of the reforms we have now in Europe, like the EEC. I would have thought that a democratic Germany, which is based on the principles of democracy and peace, for example, would still be in an economic and political crisis. When President Bush and his family come into exile, the U.S. Government will have no choice but to give them an absolute power over all matters of this nature. Our government cannot and should not accept the United States Government in any shape or form and has no plans to reform the government—in part because of the threats posed by Russia. And so I’m sick and tired of seeing that old mentality in America, in Europe, in Britain and even in other countries.
It is not just one thing we can do. As the economy and national security of the United States improves, we can do what we’ve been doing. We can do what our friends are making of it. Unfortunately, both the countries of the South and the West are getting distracted. Russia is not going to take anything from the United States Government. Russia needs to be held accountable as a serious threat to the Western world. As it is not only one-dimensional in terms of its foreign policy but is also a major part of NATO, I think Russia can be a real problem if we don’t change course. We can work harder on security. We can work more quickly when we have a better relationship with Russia and we can invest more more in our citizens. I like to think that Europe and in general can be used as a buffer buffer to prevent us from doing exactly what we’ve been doing.
We need a stronger relationship with Russia. I think it helps us stand to benefit the most from the opportunity we are now having. Russia is not interested in supporting Western business or with political parties in the United States. I believe what will make it easier for