LeadershipEssay Preview: LeadershipReport this essayAn Assessment of the United States Armys Organizational CultureThe purpose of this paper is to provide a brief analysis of the United States Armys organizational structure and its culture and how these two elements impact its workers, associates and affiliates. This paper will first examine the Armys history, development and structure to highlight the origins of the Armys. Secondly, a brief history of the Armys organizational development will be followed by a close examination of its philosophy and supporting beliefs. Lastly, this paper will discuss the role of the Armys leadership, their response to critical issues and the organizational structure of the Army. An analysis of the armys top leaders will help the reader to understand the Army culture more thoroughly in the context of the Armys organizational structure. More specifically this section of the paper will examine the Army leaderships response to the current geo-political environment and other related issues. In conclusion, this paper hopes to highlight the Armys overall functioning from an organizational standpoint and emphasize that idea that the Army is like a functional corporation. This will be accomplished by addressing various key questions throughout this text.
The U.S. Army Organizational DevelopmentArmy History and developmentThe Armys history includes many unique global events such as World War I and II, the Vietnam War, the Korean conflict and most recently operations Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom. An in depth study of these historical events is beyond the scope of this paper however, the origin of the Army is relevant in discussing the Armys overall culture.
According to David W. Hogans historical text Centuries of Service cited on the United States Armys website the United States Army was born on 14 June 1775 (Hogan, 2004). Members of the early Army forces were largely volunteers drawn from local militias. In light of conflict with the British Army the Second Continental Congress recognized that a regular military force was necessary if the colonials were to have any hope of standing up to the British Army. On 14 June, Congress adopted the New England army besieging Boston as an American army and authorized the recruitment of soldiers from various colonial states to form the Continental Army. This emerging Continental Army provided the permanent nucleus of a force that would be supplemented by local militia units. Congress chose one of its own, George Washington, as Commander-in-Chief of the new Army (Hogan, 2004).
The Continental Army is defined as a force of up to twenty-five hundred British volunteers in eight countries throughout the central United States. The Continental Air Force is defined as the entire Western Front. The Navy forces of the Continental Air Force are the American Naval Forces. The Western European forces include Norway, Spain, France, Austria, and Greece.
The European Union of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (EUGWONI) is a military institution formed in 1940 by the United Kingdom’s Royal Military Court under Lord Macdonald. In November 1947 it adopted a convention establishing and governing its new constitution, which provided it with a right to govern its citizens without interference from the British Crown. During the negotiations of the treaty there was strong movement towards greater sovereignty of the European Union, particularly in regard to freedom of movement. The new Constitution in 1951 was revised and the EUGWONI became the European Charter of State and Peoples. The EUGWONI is an independent state with universal sovereign right of political sovereignty.
Canada has, or at some times may have, experienced a major and growing conflict with the United States and its NATO allies. While Canada has not acted independently in order to protect the sovereignty of the United States, there are concerns over Canada’s economic and political position and territorial integrity in the Atlantic region. Canada is considered a leading supporter of NATO and has been the subject of military treaties and a major donor to the US during its history (Hogan, 2004). To the extent NATO has the potential because of Canada’s strong support for Canadian military might, Canadian participation in NATO has had a significant impact on the Canadian world. Canada’s defence industry has been a major recipient of military aid including in support of NATO from the US, Germany, Britain, France and Italy.
Canada is an important contributor to the strategic partnership between the US and the UK. With the backing of several NATO member states and its own strategic assets in the Atlantic region the United States and the EUGWONI have played a constructive role in assisting the former, including in this sphere the creation of a NATO based Europe with the United Kingdom. Since 1998 the Government of Canada has provided substantial sums of money to help with defence projects in the British Atlantic region and has been a strong patron of UK and NATO projects. Canada’s relationship with the British Federation of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been particularly solid for years and is likely enhanced by the establishment of the Council of Europe (ACN) in 2001, the formation of the European Council on the Status of the European Union (ECUR) in 2010 and other initiatives in the wake of the NATO war and the rise of the United Kingdom. Canada is actively involved in supporting the NATO operation in Iraq and several important engagements with NATO members such as the UK Marine Corps and NATO’s High Command Support Team.
Since 1992, NATO has provided substantial amounts of military aid to the United States including in the case of the Falklands War which took place between January 1989 and November 1993. Despite the continued presence of U.S. military force in these countries many Canadians regard Canada as one of the only remaining remaining NATO member states with military forces.
Canada maintains a significant naval garrison around the Eastern and Western portions of the Western Canadian North Sea. The American and British Navy maintains a close naval base at Lac La Boulogne and the Canadian Forces maintains a naval base in Cornwall. Canada has participated in NATO’s Trident-Q missile defence system and NATO’s New Ocean Warfare Defence System.
Since 1775, the United States has grown from a loosely organized confederation of thirteen English colonies scattered along the Atlantic seaboard to a superpower whose influence reaches around the globe (Hogan, 2004 & Schrader, 2003). The U.S. Army has contributed immeasurably to the rise of the American nation, first as the shield of the Republic during its colonial days and later as a means to project power in defense of American interests worldwide. The Armys contributions, however, go far beyond the role of a military force. Its ready availability as a source of disciplined and skilled personnel has made it an attractive option for American leaders confronted with a wide array of nonmilitary demands and crises (Heller, 2004).
Armys StructureThe Army, as one of the three military departments (e.g.: Army, Navy and Air Force) reporting to the Department of Defense, is composed of two distinct and equally important components: the active component and the reserve components. The reserve components are the United States Army Reserve and the Army National Guard. The President of the United States is also the Commander-in-Chief for all U.S. military forces. Although the President is the commander-in-Chief this does not mean that the Army only has one leader. Like many corporations the Army has various levels of leadership. Although the exact details of the Armys structure are complicated and well beyond the scope of this paper the basic army structure consist of Army personnel who are either ranked as Officers or Enlisted (non-commissioned officers). The Army also has civilian employees as well as Warrant Officers. The Army has a well defined structure called a Chain of Command.
The Chain of Command is the military hierarchy for responsibility. It is the chain of commanding officers from a superior to a subordinate through which command is exercised. It is also referred to as the command channel (cited on www.train.army.mil). The Army is divided into smaller units. A Division is composed of brigades and is commanded by a Major General. A Battalion is made up of companies and is commanded by a Lieutenant Colonel (with a Command Sergeant Major). A Company is made up of platoons and is commanded by a captain (with a first sergeant). A Platoon is composed of squads and commanded by a lieutenant (with a platoon sergeant). A Squad is composed of approximately a dozen soldiers and commanded by a sergeant or staff sergeant. A Fire Team is made up of soldiers and commanded by a Team Leader (cited on www.train.army.mil).Regardless of component, The Army conducts both operational and institutional missions.
The Chain of Command is the military hierarchy for responsibility. It is the chain of commanding officers from a superior to a subordinate through which command is exercised. It is also referred to as the command channel (cited on www.train.army.mil). The Army is divided into smaller units. A Division is composed of brigades and is commanded by a Major General. A Battalion is made up of companies and is commanded by a Lieutenant Colonel (with a Command Sergeant Major). A Company is made up of platoons and is commanded by a captain (with a platoon sergeant). A Squad is composed of approximately a dozen soldiers and commanded by a lieutenant (with a platoon sergeant). A Fire Team is made up of soldiers and commanded by a Squad Leader (cited on www.train.army.mil). Regardless of component, The Army conducts both operational and institutional missions.
The Chain of Command is the military hierarchy for responsibility. It is the chain of commanding officers from a superior to a subordinate through which command is exercised. It is also referred to as the command channel (cited on www.train.army.mil). The Army is divided into smaller units. A Division is composed of brigades and can be any of 2 divisions.
The Chain of Command is the military hierarchy for responsibility. It is the chain of commanding officers from a superior to a subordinate through which command is exercised. It is also referred to as the command channel (cited on www.train.army.mil). The Army is divided into smaller units. A Division is composed of brigades and can be any of 2 divisions.
The Chain of Command is the military hierarchy for responsibility. It is the chain of commanding officers from a superior to a subordinate through which command is exercised. It is also referred to as the command channel (cited on www.train.army.mil). The Army is divided into smaller units. A Division is composed of brigades and can be any of 2 divisions.
The Chain of Command is the military hierarchy for responsibility. It is the chain of commanding officers from a superior to a subordinate through which command is exercised. It is also referred to as the command channel (cited on www.train.army.mil). The Army is divided into smaller units. A Division is composed of brigades and can be any of 2 divisions.
According to The Army’s policy regarding military education for all men, and The Army’s policy regarding military training for all women, the following policy will guide all classes. At the first entry of each subject, a course of instruction is provided regarding any subjects chosen. The course is expected to be in English and/or Arabic and to be taught at a maximum of three days per week.
According to The Army’s policy regarding military education for all men, and The Army’s policy regarding military training for all women, the following policy will guide all classes. At the first entry of each subject, a course of instruction is provided regarding any subjects chosen. The course is expected to be in English and/or Arabic and to be taught at a maximum of three days per week.
According to The Army’s policy regarding military education for all men, and The Army’s policy toward military training for all women, the following policy will guide all classes. At the first entry of each subject, a course of instruction is provided regarding any subjects chosen. The course is expected to be in
The Chain of Command is the military hierarchy for responsibility. It is the chain of commanding officers from a superior to a subordinate through which command is exercised. It is also referred to as the command channel (cited on www.train.army.mil). The Army is divided into smaller units. A Division is composed of brigades and is commanded by a Major General. A Battalion is made up of companies and is commanded by a Lieutenant Colonel (with a Command Sergeant Major). A Company is made up of platoons and is commanded by a captain (with a platoon sergeant). A Squad is composed of approximately a dozen soldiers and commanded by a lieutenant (with a platoon sergeant). A Fire Team is made up of soldiers and commanded by a Squad Leader (cited on www.train.army.mil). Regardless of component, The Army conducts both operational and institutional missions.
The Chain of Command is the military hierarchy for responsibility. It is the chain of commanding officers from a superior to a subordinate through which command is exercised. It is also referred to as the command channel (cited on www.train.army.mil). The Army is divided into smaller units. A Division is composed of brigades and can be any of 2 divisions.
The Chain of Command is the military hierarchy for responsibility. It is the chain of commanding officers from a superior to a subordinate through which command is exercised. It is also referred to as the command channel (cited on www.train.army.mil). The Army is divided into smaller units. A Division is composed of brigades and can be any of 2 divisions.
The Chain of Command is the military hierarchy for responsibility. It is the chain of commanding officers from a superior to a subordinate through which command is exercised. It is also referred to as the command channel (cited on www.train.army.mil). The Army is divided into smaller units. A Division is composed of brigades and can be any of 2 divisions.
The Chain of Command is the military hierarchy for responsibility. It is the chain of commanding officers from a superior to a subordinate through which command is exercised. It is also referred to as the command channel (cited on www.train.army.mil). The Army is divided into smaller units. A Division is composed of brigades and can be any of 2 divisions.
According to The Army’s policy regarding military education for all men, and The Army’s policy regarding military training for all women, the following policy will guide all classes. At the first entry of each subject, a course of instruction is provided regarding any subjects chosen. The course is expected to be in English and/or Arabic and to be taught at a maximum of three days per week.
According to The Army’s policy regarding military education for all men, and The Army’s policy regarding military training for all women, the following policy will guide all classes. At the first entry of each subject, a course of instruction is provided regarding any subjects chosen. The course is expected to be in English and/or Arabic and to be taught at a maximum of three days per week.
According to The Army’s policy regarding military education for all men, and The Army’s policy toward military training for all women, the following policy will guide all classes. At the first entry of each subject, a course of instruction is provided regarding any subjects chosen. The course is expected to be in
The operational Army consists of numbered armies, corps, divisions, brigades, and battalions that conduct full spectrum operations around the world. The institutional Army supports the operational Army. Institutional organizations provide the infrastructure necessary to raise, train, equip, deploy, and ensure the readiness of all Army forces. The training base provides military skills and professional education to every soldier-as well as members of sister services and allied forces. It also allows the Army to expand rapidly in time of war (www.train.army.mil). The industrial base provides world-class equipment and logistics for the Army. Army installations provide the power-projection platforms required to deploy land forces promptly to support combatant commanders. Once those forces are deployed, the institutional Army provides the logistics needed to support them. Without the institutional Army, the operational Army cannot function. Without the operational Army, the institutional Army has no purpose. (www.train.army.mil).
Army Philosophy, Beliefs and SlogansThe Army has many formal and informal statements such as slogans, mottos, cadences and chants that are often used as recruiting or motivational tools for new and existing soldiers. Recruiting efforts are on going and positions in the worlds largest military force are regularly filled with new soldiers everyday. Some people are motivated by the money the Army