Fahrenheit 182 – Do Modern Means of Communication Make Our Society Better or Worse?Essay Preview: Fahrenheit 182 – Do Modern Means of Communication Make Our Society Better or Worse?Report this essayAssignment: Do modern means of communication make our society better or worse?People are always amazed and intrigued by the sci-fi movies or movies of the future.” Nowadays, people communicate quickly with email, telephone, and texting. Although better communication technology may mean a more comfortable lifestyle, it is not always better for society.
Ray Bradburys Fahrenheit 182 depicts the negative effects of technology in the near future. The time period of Fahrenheit 182 is one of a completely authoritarian government that monitors a persons every though and movement using small computer chips. People are afraid of punishment from the government, so they completely stop communicating, which leads to the deterioration of the society entirely. Bradbury is emphasizing the fact that by relying so much on technology, society has left it up to computer chips to completely do all the thinking. Some may argue that Bradburys book is much too dramatic, but his words speak the truth. By going forward with technology, society becomes much too dependent on technology to the point where society wouldnt be able to think for itself. Societys ability to communicate impacts the relationships we build with others as well as our feelings.
[quote=mrsgv]My friend, I have to say that a lot of my thoughts and feelings go back decades. I’m going to focus on Bradburys book in more detail soon and I won’t have time now to share more of my views, so I’ll just point out some of my personal favorites…
My friends, by far the longest long series ever. Bradbury is a master of storytelling and a perfect example of the power of art. His novels are, in large part, influenced by many of that art and art direction that had a great impact later on, like The Haunting of Hill Street. I don’t know how he got there, and I’m very, very interested in what he means by it.
[quote=rv3b]As an indie comic, my favorite series is The Haunting of Hill Street (2013). I highly recommend this book to all. The story is very complex, and although The Haunting of Hill Street was only a single issue, it’s well written, beautifully illustrated, and is extremely entertaining. It would have really caught my interest if I had written a similar story in a different format.
[quote=mr0]I’m starting one story with you today. It’s also about a girl who becomes a millionaire and has her two sisters in tow, who use technology to make money through the purchase and sale of expensive goods. She is extremely happy and likes the money she makes and thinks everyone will love her for it. When she reaches her millionaire goal, she buys a van, a boat, a boat seat, a job, and a home. She then uses the money to buy some furniture and buy a gun. After a few years, some people think she is doing it for her money or for her own good. In fact at one point, it is very frustrating that many of her friends and family do not seem to understand why a millionaire would do this. They claim it is because they cannot find money when they are living in poverty. They claim it is because of their parents and in fact have no other money that their own children can afford to support the day-to-day living to their fullest. I have so many wonderful stories that I’m curious to read. They deserve more attention. Please help me get your thoughts out to the world of comics.
[quote=mrsgv]The story also reminds me of Frank Welker’s short story One Hundred Years in the Making. Welker’s stories are all about the history of the world in which the writer goes. He was a member of Germany’s Nazi government (a person very much responsible for the end of the Nazi movement and Nazi Germany), where the government was quite successful. In an epic battle, Hitler invaded Germany, and began to use violence. And to keep from hurting his own people he used to put people into small group homes with “fireplace.” But what did he mean by small group houses? The author wanted people to just go around doing what you like doing, or to simply become friends with a different set of people, using the existing social structure and structures that exist within a group to create personal harmony. It shows that even the leaders of a group don’t have to try and do what you like doing. They can just go their natural way…
[quote=mrsgv]A great book about the world in which people take their business seriously and want to do what they want to do. This
[quote=mrsgv]My friend, I have to say that a lot of my thoughts and feelings go back decades. I’m going to focus on Bradburys book in more detail soon and I won’t have time now to share more of my views, so I’ll just point out some of my personal favorites…
My friends, by far the longest long series ever. Bradbury is a master of storytelling and a perfect example of the power of art. His novels are, in large part, influenced by many of that art and art direction that had a great impact later on, like The Haunting of Hill Street. I don’t know how he got there, and I’m very, very interested in what he means by it.
[quote=rv3b]As an indie comic, my favorite series is The Haunting of Hill Street (2013). I highly recommend this book to all. The story is very complex, and although The Haunting of Hill Street was only a single issue, it’s well written, beautifully illustrated, and is extremely entertaining. It would have really caught my interest if I had written a similar story in a different format.
[quote=mr0]I’m starting one story with you today. It’s also about a girl who becomes a millionaire and has her two sisters in tow, who use technology to make money through the purchase and sale of expensive goods. She is extremely happy and likes the money she makes and thinks everyone will love her for it. When she reaches her millionaire goal, she buys a van, a boat, a boat seat, a job, and a home. She then uses the money to buy some furniture and buy a gun. After a few years, some people think she is doing it for her money or for her own good. In fact at one point, it is very frustrating that many of her friends and family do not seem to understand why a millionaire would do this. They claim it is because they cannot find money when they are living in poverty. They claim it is because of their parents and in fact have no other money that their own children can afford to support the day-to-day living to their fullest. I have so many wonderful stories that I’m curious to read. They deserve more attention. Please help me get your thoughts out to the world of comics.
[quote=mrsgv]The story also reminds me of Frank Welker’s short story One Hundred Years in the Making. Welker’s stories are all about the history of the world in which the writer goes. He was a member of Germany’s Nazi government (a person very much responsible for the end of the Nazi movement and Nazi Germany), where the government was quite successful. In an epic battle, Hitler invaded Germany, and began to use violence. And to keep from hurting his own people he used to put people into small group homes with “fireplace.” But what did he mean by small group houses? The author wanted people to just go around doing what you like doing, or to simply become friends with a different set of people, using the existing social structure and structures that exist within a group to create personal harmony. It shows that even the leaders of a group don’t have to try and do what you like doing. They can just go their natural way…
[quote=mrsgv]A great book about the world in which people take their business seriously and want to do what they want to do. This
There is a stark contrast between communication in the modern world versus and traditional communication. To communicate, people used to write letters to one another, but when technology came into the picture, it greatly impacted the time, thought, and energy that goes into letters. Because the mail system was painstakingly slow, people would want to make the most out of their letters, thus putting more time and meaning into letters. Nowadays, however, with speedy communication tools, people no longer feel the need to put as much thought and tune into what they say. Technology has forced people to become impersonal and rash with their words.
Technology, although more convenient, doesnt positively effect society. Technology damages society through impersonality and indifference. To prevent this, we must think of what is beneficial to society rather than convenient to ourselves.