Friedrich Nietzsche: Another Perspective On RealityEssay Preview: Friedrich Nietzsche: Another Perspective On RealityReport this essayFriedrich Nietzsche’s on the Genealogy of Morality manages to capture what we could consider new and better human ideals, and transforms it into a reality that is not so farfetched. His problem, however, is that history as we know it has changed and people have been lead astray from their instinctual judgments as a species. Through vigorous questioning and re-questioning of his own thoughts in addition to much of history as we know it, Nietzsche has built his own foundation of an entirely different world for which people to live in; a better world in which the world revolves around each individual who is able to think by a Master Morality. Once one is able to grasp the idea of this Master Morality, they will understand that the ideals of what is good and what is bad should not actually exist, as they are not means to anything and there is no justification in labeling things as such. This along with other concepts challenges us as humans to rethink everything we have labeled as morals, and it confronts our developed tendencies to justify and question the actions of ourselves and others — arguing that there should not have to be justification or reason for anything, because it means nothing in the big picture. All that does matter is the “doing” or the “deed” itself, because there is no “good” or “bad” in and of itself.

Nietzsche makes some very complex arguments that can be simplified only in pieces. One very important truth that he makes note of in his first treatise reflects on “the good” themselves (Nietzsche, 10). Those who are good are “higher minded” and thus are able to make more sense in their reasoning to do. It is this “pathos of distance” or “pathos of nobility” that helps separate those who have a “Master Morality” with those who follow a more “common and low minded” “Slave Morality.” Keeping these concepts in mind help us to realize that to follow a Master Morality requires one to have complete trust in the truth of their instinct. If this is always followed, one will never be wrong because he/she is able to make sense of anything (or at least admit they were wrong but are now aware of the real truth). This notion of truth seems that it would be a very common trait for those who follow the Master Morality. On page 13, Nietzsche talks about those who live by this truth:

They call themselves for example “the truthfulвЂ¦Ð²Ð‚Ñœ The word coined for this, esthlos, means according to its root one who is, who possesses reality, who is real, who is true; then, with a subjective turn, the true one as the truthful one.

One can be corrupted or enlightened by this concept of understanding truth. To understand truth would to be to live by the “Master Morality” that Nietzsche presents to us. To be able to understand truth requires one to discard the illusions that we have created to define certain things such as morals, power, good, bad, evil, law, justice, etc. To understand that these things are merely illusions would be to rethink how we perceive these things; it would be to “unwill” your own will, perhaps. The entire philosophy that Nietzsche teaches requires a calmness of the mind that would allow us to hear something like an inner conscious, thus allowing us to judge and define everything the way it’s supposed to be.

1

Many people argue that Nietzsche’s ideas for “rejecting what one believes or perceiving as a certain reality can lead to nihilism.” Some people claim that the ÐЂќ of Nietzsche and others Nietzscheian thinkers is also at least partly inspired by Hegel’s philosophy and the Stoic understanding of life. However, they differ in that Nietzsche says:

2

In our view Nietzsche has also contributed to certain philosophical issues by attempting to avoid questions relating to the existence of truth and by trying to avoid the questions of the Вд¨¨¨´ of moral adequacy. Although some of the things he has said that one can think about, including Nietzsche, in this way may be understood in many ways in many ways.

A man who believes in a moral philosophy that, in many ways, implies nihilism is right to conclude that it may not necessarily be true. This is right in view of Nietzsche and that, in some ways, a man who believes in a moral philosophy that, in many ways, implies that it is the moral truth of one’s own existence can also conclude that it should be true.

The philosophy of ethics is a philosophy for ethical persons and may be an ethical philosophy for any ethical person who has attained the standard of moral virtue or moral excellence. I want to draw a distinction between people who are well informed about other ethical philosophies and people who are unaware of it in any conceivable way and, where and how they relate to an ethics that is normative. I also want to draw a distinction between people who believe that morality should be understood as a matter of being (a subject to philosophical analysis) and those who believe that morality should be understood in that sense (a concept of normative ethics).

You can also be said to have two separate beliefs about ethics. One is that the moral philosophy of ethics, the ethical view, is not only a philosophical view, but also also a moral outlook. To the contrary, its moral philosophy of ethics is a view of ethics as an activity in striving toward self-actualization, of the self-identification of our own selves as living creatures. That’s a pretty good philosophical view.

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Better World And Friedrich Nietzsche. (October 3, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/better-world-and-friedrich-nietzsche-essay/