Biological Theories on Crime Comparison
Essay Preview: Biological Theories on Crime Comparison
Report this essay
Biological 1.Theories on Crime Comparison Lillie Johnson AJS/542 August 10, 2015 Cheryl Reyes Biological 2. Abstract The theory I will be presenting is Biological. Crimes is thought about as one of the most stimulating and critical matters of the society throughout the years. The widespread of crime is overwhelming. Some criminologists have considered crime as one among different forms of behavior, in which there are obsoleting theories. Some think of crime as a form of behavior and this type of behavior is called anomic. While others think it is a intentional response to social issue, conditions, and stress and the breakdown in social order or law enforcement as well as the labeling of certain as deviant and unusual. Since the different cultural exist in organization as well as values, what is considered criminal or unlawful may be different, even though most societies have restrictive laws and customs (Akers, 2004). Some contexts like psychological traits and hereditary physical are being ruled out as independent cause of crime; however, psychological states are noted to identify a individuals reaction to powerful environmental impacts. Such elements dont identify whether a person will commit a crime, in fact some peoples with such elements do not commit crimes. In preference, the company of these components merely raises the possibilities that such person will engage in criminal behavior. Such different biological elements may be influenced by environmental condition, the direction of causation continues not clear (Akers & Sellers, 2004). Biological 3.
Biological The biological theories of crime have shown a bond with a greater possibility to be implicated in criminal behavior and particular biological conditions. This statement began in the 1890s which lead to several arguments leading to the creation of the biological theory of Cesare Lombross (an Italian Criminologist) who examination of the skulls of criminals and face characteristic that led him to the disagreement that persistent or criminality was bonded with the atavism which is the reversal of the earliest pace of human development (Akers & Sellers, 2004). William Sheldon in the mid 20th century won support for the theory that the behavior of a person was more understood among a athletic that are muscular than among a thin or a tall person, or even soft individuals that are rounded. While in the 60s, critical discussions was developed over plausible linkage within criminal behavior. Especially, understanding XYY in males chromosome or those that have the presence of an extra Y chromosomes are noted to be exposed to criminal behavior than other individual and more prone. Now the good name of the prior theories has lessened researchers are still continuing results to significant findings. For instance, a few studies have noted that general proof for an association with biology and criminality for both twins and adoptee. It can be told that twins are more likely to show in a general way possibilities in criminality if the twins are exactly alike than if they are fraternal twins (Ardelt and Day, 2002). The understanding that genetically identical twins are alike than fraternal twins which suggest that emergence of genetic influences on criminal behaviors and criminal acts. In the same way, research on kids that are adopted has noted that the likelihood of criminality usually agree with their biological parents. Studies showed that the criminality rate is greater with adopted kids who only have one adoptive parent who commits crime but their biological parents are not criminals. It was also noted that the highest rates of criminality with children whose biological and adoptive parents are criminals.