3 NegrosEssay Preview: 3 NegrosReport this essayIn the period after Reconstruction the position of African Americans in southern American society steadily deteriorated. After 1877 the possibilities of advancements for African Americans disappeared almost completely. African Americans experienced a loss of voting rights and political power created by methods of terrorization such as lynching. The remaining political and economic gains that were made during reconstruction were eventually whittled away by Southern legislation. By the 1900s African Americans had almost no access to political, social, or economic power. Shortly after this Jim Crow laws began to emerge, segregating blacks and whites. This dramatic transition from African American power to powerlessness after reconstruction gave birth to two important leaders in the African American community, Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois. Although these two remarkable men were both in search of a common goal, their roads leading to this goal were significantly different. This is most evident in the two most important documents of the mens careers: Booker T. Washingtons, “1895 Atlanta Exposition Speech” and W.E.B. DuBois response to this, “The Souls of Black Folks.” These two men were both dedicated to solving the difficult problems African Americans experienced in the post reconstruction south. Both DuBois and Washington wanted economic prosperity for African Americans but they differed on what would be done to achieve this. Both men focused on education as a key to the improvement of black life but they differed on the form education should take. The true difference in these mens extremely different routes to better the lives of African Americans after reconstruction was a product of their extremely different backgrounds. In this essay I will examine the documents, “1895 Atlanta Exposition Speech” by Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois, “The Souls of Black Folks” in order to determine the paths that each of these men took towards the advancement of African Americans, and the reasons behind these methods.
DuBois and Washington came from extremely different backgrounds. These differences are essential to understanding why each of these men went about trying to achieve progress for their race in the way they did. DuBois, the son of free parents, was born a free man and grew up in a white environment with more privileges and advantages than the majority of African Americans living in the United States at that time. He suffered neither severe economic hardship nor from repeated encounters with racism. In contrast, Booker T. Washington was born a slave on a Virginia plantation. In the first chapter of his Autobiography, Up From Slavery, he states, “My life had its beginning in the midst of the most miserable, desolate, and discouraging surroundings.” This is in direct contrast with the life of W.E.B. Dubois. After the Civil War Washington and his family were declared free. Washington worked his way up from being a slave and eventually became a student at the Hampton Institute in Virginia. These extremely different backgrounds effected both of these mens political, social, and economic views. Throughout his life Washington had a pessimistic view of whites and saw the only way to achieve progress was to tell whites what they wanted to hear. DuBois had a more optimistic view. Growing up mostly with whites DuBois has a romantic belief in America. He believes that whites have a morality deep down that only needs to be stirred up. At a time when more than one hundred African Americans were lynched each year in the south Washingtons perception seems much more realistic.
The debate between Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois reflected the economic despair that African Americans in the South felt. The Southern economy was suffering from its extreme racism and Washington saw this as an opportunity to create economic opportunities for blacks. Booker T. Washingtons, “Atlanta Exposition Speech” was given at an industrial fair in Atlanta, Georgia. The Industrial fair was the showcase for the new south and a symbol of the progress the south had made in industry since the end of the civil war. It was the perfect place to make a speech advocating that Southern business owners, “Cast down your buckets where you are.” Meaning they use the labor of blacks which was readily available around them. To further entice white capitalists he evoked images of blacks as the loyal servants they had been as slaves in order to gain the trust needed for whites to provide blacks with jobs. In the “Atlanta Exposition Speech” he stated, “As we have proved our loyalty to you in the past, in nursing your children, watching by the sickbed of your mothers and fathers, and often following them with tear-dimmed eyes to their graves, so in the future, in our humble way, we shall stand by you with a devotion that no foreigner can approach.” By doing this Washington hoped to appeal to the white Southerners who were weary of labor strikes in the North. He urged whites to, “Cast down your bucket among these people who have, without strikes and labor wars, tilled your fields, cleared your forests, builded your railroads and cities, and brought forth treasures from the bowels of the earth, and helped make possible this magnificent representation of the progress of the South.” This was an attempt by Washington to provoke jobs for blacks from white Southerners, however, there were problems with this. By offering not to strike and invoking these images of slaves he made way for a new type of wage slavery. DuBois wrote “The Souls of Black Folks” largely as a reaction to the ideas hatched by Washington.
One of the most important obstacles for African Americans that Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois challenged was the lack of education available to blacks in the South, where the majority of African American people lived during this time. Both Washington and DuBois received a college level education, but Washingtons was merely vocational training versus the Harvard Ph.D. held by DuBois. Despite their differences, both Washington and DuBois saw this lack of educational opportunity for blacks a serious problem, however the differences in their education reflect their stances on the issue. Washington thought that an industrial education would be more beneficial to African Americans. “Vocational education for Washington meant living in the South in the economic condition in which you found it, to aspire to be carpenters, to be bricklayers, to be seamstresses and to create black businesses (
) _______________________________________
http://thehill.com/blogs/nolanyacks/archive/archive/2011/10/12/a-minority-spook/
http://www.baylor.edu/journals/nyp/news.asp?journalID=2825&articleID=1707&ref=p-2
http://www.whitehall.ca/news/2010/03/27/america-news/black-marriage-and-the-law/
http://newspapers.baylor.edu/archives/dw.pritchard3_10.pdf
http://www.lohud.edu/archives/news/p/201.110.30.2015.091.0/piper.cfm?ID=11&rel=0031;B
http://www.b.cuny.edu/archives/news/2010/10/whitehouse%20on%20discrimination.pdf
http://www.npr.org/sections/topics/2004/01/06/whitehouse-baylor-baptist-decision.cfm?ID=10&refererid=P0022
http://thespec.nationalreview.com/2010/09/30/opinion/d-fenton-williams-s-first-choice argument/
_____
*B. B. B. Settleland, ‘The American South: From the Daughters to the Sons of Men’, American Journal of Political Science: 2000, Volume 10, Issue 10, p. 498-507, July 2004
*H. C. Hickey, ‘Women’s Rights in the South: The Case of the Negro College,’ African American Studies 36:1 (April 1996), pp. 29-40, in Martin J. Hickey and Jie H. Wilson, eds., The Civil Rights Movement in the US and South Africa (eds. Smith, J., and Allen, J.). Washington D.C.: State University of New York Press, 2005.
B. Settleland, ‘Equal Equalization or Not?’ The New York Times, 28 May 2002, at http://www.nytimes.com/1992/05/28/opinion/race/the-american-south.html
*H. C. Hickey, ‘In Search of Justice, Negro Women Should Not Be Forced to Read,’ The Nation, 11 February 17, 2002, at http://www.nn.com/2002/PARIS/NEWS/index.html?s=article&id=6-11 ;J. A. Stahl, “‘Why No Negro Woman Should Be Committed to a College'” The New York Times, 29 January 2000, at http://www.nytimes.com/2000/ENGLISH/News/00/29/us/politics/how-every-other-race-women-should-not-be-forced-into-studio