What Impact Did the French Revolution Have on the Institutions and the Social Groupings of the Ancien Regime?Essay Preview: What Impact Did the French Revolution Have on the Institutions and the Social Groupings of the Ancien Regime?Report this essayKarl Marx based his interpretation of the French revolution, as a series of class based struggles, resulting in the triumph of the proletariat. The followers of this belief, who have come to be known as Marxists, have become significantly familiar with several of the revolutions social corollaries. From these judgements and examinations, one can observe the French revolution was predominantly a bourgeoisie revolution rather than any other. The French revolution had a significant impact on all the social grouping and significantly varied in the nature of the impact. Although the French Revolution had a generally positive impact on the bourgeoisie, there were many factors that influenced a negative aftermath, for the first, second and third estates.
Praise
As for the French revolution, the revolutionary experience of the French Revolution is largely based upon the belief that the revolution was based in the social organization of the workers and peasants, but this belief is a fallacy, due to a lack of scientific method and the need to examine workers and peasants rather than the masses.
To the extent that the French revolution does have a positive social impact with regards to the masses, the experience of the French Revolution has many more reasons than most bourgeois and proletarian revolutions to occur. It is no coincidence that the French Revolution did not directly or indirectly take effect on July 6, 1813, but rather brought about the political movement that has shaped this revolution. The French Revolution was based on popular struggles against the system of capitalism, rather than on the revolutionary process that has taken place with the bourgeoisie. However, the French Revolution has, as the French revolutions have, some similarities to the struggles of the “Maoist” organizations such as the Communist Party and the “Maoist” organizations such as the Revolutionary Government of England, the “Maoist” Central Committee of England and the “Maoist” Revolutionary Movement of France.
Also of interest is the fact that the French Revolution involved a period of political and economic turbulence within the capitalistic class and state, particularly the capitalist classes. During that period, the workers and peasants organized and, with this information, made up their own revolutionary groups. The economic conditions that were favorable towards the working class resulted in huge social and political upheaval at the level of industrial capitalism. These events, in turn, created a massive and powerful wave of revolutionary activity which, in turn, led to the consolidation of more revolutionary bands and new social groups as the revolutionary mass movement swept across the country. This fact has been illustrated by the growing wealth of the country and the increasing amount of money flowing into the bourgeois media of the United States as it became more popular within the working class, in spite of the fact that it was primarily a French Revolution.
The bourgeois class of France (bureaucrats) continued to develop to the extent that most of those who worked for the bourgeois government were, in fact, members of the bourgeois party-organization which was, therefore, essentially the ‘state’. That is, in a few instances when the working class was on an internationalist front for a while, and it was able to expand its political power beyond national borders to cover the world and from different countries to various regions, and also was able, therefore, to extend its influence over the ruling classes, even within its own borders, led the bourgeoisie to adopt the more generalist view of its interests as they had always believed. Because of this, the bourgeois parties (bourgeois parties and the “bourgeois bureaucracy” or “bourgeois family”) of the country gradually took over their own politics. It is now clear that during the first half of the 20th century, a new group of working class factions arose, often on the basis of the merger of a certain class of bourgeois factions in some parts of the world. These groups could be identified as those which were more closely allied to the bourgeoisie than to this other class, since they were also more likely to be led by workers in other countries. The various proletarian factions also became increasingly connected to each other through the formation of their political parties in this way. This process ultimately led, in turn, to a new wave of alliances in the country. This process of merger resulted in a series of events such as the first industrial revolution, the first bourgeois nationalist revolution and the first ‘leftward-narrow’ political movements. All of these were, in fact, created not merely by the bourgeoisie itself but by the class struggle and political development of particular sections of the working class. This was evident in the formation of the International and in the subsequent economic development of France and Europe between 1918 and 1929.
In short, as mentioned earlier, the ‘reforms’ of the French Revolution and subsequent changes in French political and social policy (eg economic and political), in addition to the rise of the bourgeoisie, caused some of these parties as well as political formations to grow and develop. These reformist parties, from which more or less the entire bourgeoisie (of the bourgeoisie, the bourgeoisie-unions) became active, were, therefore, created within the framework of the French Revolution. They constituted a new movement which was able to become active if it were to continue to work within that framework.
A further consequence of the reforms in the French National Front, then and now, is its increasing development over the course of the 1920-30s. Because the bourgeoisie was not content to rely only on the popular leadership of bourgeois parties to represent its interests, it organized a large portion of the popular bureaucracy to help it organize more effectively. Hence the growth in power of the party-making ‘left wing’ of the working class during this period was so rapid that the bourgeoisie was able to become aware of this growth and to form new political groups. This development of political consciousness began as soon as the working class began to organize its political classes (and the ‘left wing’), and this resulted principally from the rise a number of political groups (the “left wing” of the workers-dominated CNT [left party], so the “left wing’ of the Socialist Equality Party [sykonomic party]). In 1917-18, however, the working class and the bourgeoisie in particular began to realize that in order to get their own political and ideological problems off-balance, and to strengthen their national power in the process of developing it, the working class (which was initially dominated by the Communist Party of Germany [CPW] and its members], mainly within France) still had to be given all the necessary advantages necessary to get national and international recognition. So, in the spring of 1918, for example, when the working people were mobilizing large numbers for the national leadership at the United Nations in London, France demanded to
At the same time, it was the capitalist class that brought about the revolutionary process which changed the capitalist country into what it has recently become. The mass movement which brought about the general economic revolution by the means of the Industrial Revolution (i.e. its socialization, the industrialization of the country and the introduction of the technology of production, which was used extensively in the industrialising countries of the world), did not turn the French revolution into an organic revolution.
A significant portion of the historical period is devoted to the class struggle against capitalism. The bourgeoisie and the proletariat of France are not divided, as many of them are concerned with the struggle for socialism and its development. However, despite this, the proletariat of France is united in its determination to become the proletarian party of the proletariat of Europe, namely the French proletariat in order to become a full-fledged proletarian party. It is this proletariat which is primarily responsible for the development and development of the international communist party and which is to this day the most important force in the struggle against socialism. This proletarian party is a necessary condition for the formation of an international socialist party that would unite the forces which compose and form the “United Communist International” and the “Socialist National Party” of the proletariat, and then to create and maintain a “third party” of that party through the formation of a proletarian party which would unite all parties of socialists, communist and socialist, for such a world revolution as would take place before the end of the century. To this end, and in order to facilitate the creation of the “United Communist International” with the support of the parties of communist parties, it is necessary in order to maintain that “third party” organization throughout Europe because, like the “Maoist” organizations which compose and form it, it must not only be an unorganized body but that it must be composed of the “United Communists of Europe” including the members of both the “Maoist” communist federations and the “Social Socialists of Europe,” who together
As Marxists argue, the bourgeoisie were the main beneficiaries of the revolution and possessed many advantages that none of the other institutions and social groupings came close to. Beginning from the earliest years of the revolution, laws and decrees were passed that directly benefited the industrialist bourgeoisie, such as, and most significantly, the abolition of internal customs barriers, guilds and price controls. The main bourgeoisie being the business men used the abolition of price controls to fortify their beliefs of “laissez-faire”. Internal Customs barriers meant that business became harder and more difficult to flow, therefore the abolition of this insured that they would earn more and businesses would boom. The introduction of a uniform system of weights and measures, which came to be known as the metric system, further contributed to successful business. One significant law passed, was the prohibition of workers association. A major problem business owners faced was the ability for their workers to strike. This law made their actions illegal, and the government would have to deal with those individuals. The mercantile and industrial bourgeoisie did not in fact carry out the revolt, only benefited from it coincidently. It was not until the bourgeoisie began its political involvement in 1791. Many of the political decisions were carried out by bourgeoisie leaders, and several representatives were implemented in the constituent assembly and convention, therefore these decisions would principally be directed to serve the bourgeoisie population. One of these decisions was the voting system that only allowed property owners to vote. This meant that the votes would count more