Brazil CultureJoin now to read essay Brazil Culture“The cultural context in which human communication occurs is perhaps the most defining influence on human interaction. Culture provides the overall framework in which humans learn to organize their thoughts, emotions, and behaviors in relation to their environment” (1). By going through the five dimensions of the cultural context of Brazil, a lot is revealed about the interesting culture, and gives a better understanding of how Brazilians live.
The first dimension in the cultural context is whether the culture is individualistic or collectivistic. Most Latin countries are collectivistic, but Brazil has a slightly higher individualistic rank compared to them. “Despite regional and social class variations, the Brazilian way of life has common traits that distinguish it from the customary ways of dealing with people and situations in North America and Europe and even in other Latin American countries” (2). Brazilians are more individualistic in other ways that they are more self-centered. They find ways to bend the rules and find alternative ways of doing things. Brazilians, though, are not one hundred percent individualistic. They are considered a good mix of being both individualistic and collectivistic because while many of them tend to bend the rules, there are those who place a very high value on the family relationships. There are many good parent/children relationships, and there is a lot of value placed on these. Many of the responsibilities are shared, but on the other hand, many of them are independent. According to Hofstedes individualistic rank, “Brazil falls right in the middle at 38”, suggesting that it is easy to see that they are a mixture of both (1). Since Brazilians are such a mixture of both individualistic and collectivistic cultures, they have a social behavior that is guided by ones own attitude, while the culture can still be taught to learn to cooperate and get along for the good of the group. The individualistic and collectivistic aspects of the Brazilian culture are both seen as vertical. The power distance is unequal and there is unequal power in these groups. “Socioeconomic inequality involves subtle forms of residential, educational, and workplace discrimination, in such ways that members of distinct socioeconomic strata tend to live, work, and circulate in different settings. The well-to-do live in chic neighborhoods, usually centrally located, go to private schools, drive or ride in cars, and shop at malls. The urban poor live in favelas or distant housing projects, take long bus trips to work, go to public schools or drop out, and shop at smaller supermarkets or local shops. The rural poor in the countrys interior are practically invisible to the urban upper and middle classes” (2).
The second dimension in the cultural context is High or Low Context Communication. When it comes to Brazilians communicating in high or low context, they lean more toward the low context. “Language is one of the strongest elements of Brazils national unity” (2). Their main language is Portuguese, and it is spoken by nearly all of their population. Their verbal code is their primary source of information because the written Brazilian Portuguese is significantly different from the spoken language and is used correctly by only a small educated minority of the Brazilian population. This culture relies extensively on the verbals for creating and interpreting meaning. This doesnt mean they dont use nonverbal communication at all. “The O.K. hand signal is a rude gesture in Brazil, to express appreciation, a Brazilian may appear to pinch his earlobe between thumb and forefinger, and flicking the fingertips underneath the chin indicates that you do not know the answer to a question” (3). These are just a few of the different kinds of nonverbal communication used.
The third dimension in the cultural context is Value Orientation. “In every culture, there are universal problems and conditions that must be addressed. For a given culture, however, there are only a limited number of solutions to these problems and these possible solutions are motivated by the values of the culture” (1). At the level of interpersonal relations, in contrast to what is usually found in Spanish-speaking Latin America, where behavior tends to be more formal and rigid, there are in Brazil strong cultural values in favor of conciliation, tolerance, and cordiality. To the extent possible, direct personal confrontation is avoided. “Brazilian style of behavior may be derived from an Iberian and colonial heritage of diverse ethnic groups living together, weaker central authority exercised by the Portuguese crown, and day-to-day practical forms of resistance to exploitation. Whatever its origins, Brazilians are known for their informality, good nature, and charm,
” and there are several factors at work. The first is to a large degree the cultural and economic condition of indigenous individuals. “E. The second is the socio-economic condition of the peoples inhabiting and serving to maintain the system of power and state. There is less social differentiation between the rural and urban middle classes and in both regions the socio-economic disparity is minimal and the high status of each individual. This means that the level of social differentiation among the “rich and powerful” population of Brazil and its regions can be measured by an even more reliable metric of the social standard-of- living of the people in the communes. As a result, there is, over the past 50 years, an increased risk that the political and political elite of a particular community in the region will use political violence to weaken or impose its political power or to subvert its social organization. When a political threat is being used to weaken the social organization, the leadership and the political class should be prepared to go about their work on a political level, regardless of the threat. However, it is often necessary for each country to consider the political consequences of its actions. In particular, when conflict occurs, it is necessary for governmental, sociocultural and judicial authorities to investigate and defend the situation to the extent possible in an impartial and fair manner. Socialization must be carried out according to the principles laid out in Article 13 and Article 14 of the Catechism of the United Nations (CODOM)— which includes the protection of social organizations from threats by outsiders and to prevent exploitation of economic, social or cultural resources by persons who are not its officials, who are not its citizens, and who have no association with one or any of its official institutions. The government has responsibility to ensure that the social programs provided to its people are applied to all situations in which the public and private spheres are divided, or in which the government’s efforts in making efforts to preserve or increase its social organization may not be successful. Such a responsibility belongs to the community of persons in which they live, but is also due to the individuals who support the program in question, not to those who are not the program’s representatives.(2)The Brazilian government is a strong and unified force and it would behoove the community throughout its administration to consider the political and political dynamics in the current environment. To achieve this, it must ensure that the social organizations that are at the core of society and at least within the framework of the democratic norms of human rights have the institutional resources to fulfill their potential. The community must do all it can to facilitate and support the political, political and societal activities and the activities of the organizations to meet its own social needs. Even in some societies in which civil law is not fully applied, the government often uses a combination of violence, intimidation and intimidation, especially of police, military and paramilitary forces, and international relations as a means of dealing with these threats. If it is required that this use would cause harm, such as the loss of basic human rights, then its use will be condemned. This is particularly true for large, political, educational activities, such as university or professional soccer tournaments to which members of the community often resort.(3)Finally, during a crisis, the government must do all it can to protect the social activities and other activities of the community. Social organizations located in and around the capital are often under the best-case management plan, and they must respond in a manner consistent with the human rights and democratic norms of the community. For example, if a security threat is made by a group of people living with the intention of harassing or attacking a school or society (as happened in some case in Brazil), then the government must take appropriate measures to eliminate the threat so that the organization can serve as a forum for dialogue. The people-organized organization may not be a safe place to live and is not a