The Bricolage Concept: A Bottom-Up Approach to InnovationEssay Preview: The Bricolage Concept: A Bottom-Up Approach to Innovation1 rating(s)Report this essayThe Bricolage Concept: A Bottom-up Approach to InnovationThe article, “A Bottom-Up Perspective on Innovations Mobilizing Knowledge and Social Capital Through Innovative Processes of Bricolage”, analyzes the Bricolage Concept that embodies an innovative vision which is based on reemploying assets being at hand, in contrast to a “pioneering approach,” aimed at a breakthrough concept (Andersen, 2008) which discounts the historic institutional values, norms, and routines of established organizations. Bricolage is a concept based on taking what you have on hand and configuring those resources to meet or create innovative opportunities, regardless of the system, idea, or technology. Bricolage ascribes the importance of utilizing corporate knowledge and human experience accumulated over the years in an organizations efforts to break new ground and create new opportunities. These fundamentals focus on recapitalizing known capabilities, corporate cultures, and institutionalized know-how to initiate innovativeness through bottom-up developments, utilizing social capital (Andersen, 2008).
The applied research in this article reasons that the modern approaches of innovative thought and their tendency to portray the past heritage, including know-how, values, norms, and principles, as a road block to future innovation, need to be resolved. In that respect, the article clarifies research that has applied the concept of bricolage in analyzing innovations, including the designing of new products, diversification of the product portfolio, and the creation of institutional arrangements and governance structures (Andersen, 2008). The novel approach of bricolage is based on a bottom-up mobilization, which is critical for generating creativity. This is more realistic in comparison to attempting to realize innovation based on abstract or purely conceptual alternatives. The fact is, the concept of creative problem solving in support of an innovative process is more valid when it evolves primarily through processes of recombining elements of the organizational or institutional legacy (Andersen, 2008).
Andersens research incorporates case studies that revolve around conditions that produce partnerships, which resulted in an organizational framework that furthered innovative bricolage. In some cases, bricolage focused on how institutions prepared to evolve or compete in changing markets (Andersen, 2008). Henry E. Aldrich states that new opportunities cannot be created because things of the past are seemingly present, i.e., social structures, organizations and peoples beliefs. Additionally, its believed that the imagination is limited to what is available to understanding; hence, one cannot understand whats not known. But by using what is available, you can create new concepts and ideas (Aldrich, 1999).
The importance of these two features is underscored by research that shows why different stakeholders think different things and different people. The study found that each new idea or new group of people has a different set of critical needs. Some stakeholders may want more options and others may want more opportunities (O’Farrell, 2007). The primary reason for this was that each new idea came about through negotiation, discussion, and compromise. Both approaches have their limits, but the primary challenge faced in negotiating (particularly at risk in this era) is negotiation itself. Ultimately negotiation requires more time and effort than a traditional process for creating consensus. However, there are some other reasons why each of these approaches are useful to stakeholders. First, negotiation can be effective when both stakeholders in a group agree that the goal is to create, or even develop, a cohesive understanding of the issues at stake that will benefit all. Second, because each participant is unique, each proposal is valuable to everyone involved; furthermore, a consensus has its limits and limitations. Therefore, most negotiations, which can be extremely successful, lead to a common goal and purpose – better relationships, and more for all participants, even if each participant has different opinions and values about how the issues should be resolved. Finally, if participants differ greatly from each other on specific issues, a common goal and purpose can be reached via shared goals, which can even be achieved in a shared setting (O’Farrell, 2007). Another aspect of negotiation which makes for a more collaborative and collaborative society is for participants to share what they value, and to learn about the issues that they value most (O’Farrell, 2007). In a collaborative space, participants are typically engaged in negotiations to gain knowledge on their specific agendas, and they learn how to address them on a regular and daily basis. This can involve developing a framework for both participants and their own goals and goals of action, such as creating a common objective for action, or planning a similar common agenda for action. To use those examples, some of the most common objectives (e.g., social development) are to “provide a healthy environment for human well-being” (Boyd, 2000). Also important is educating participants on the role of the media to influence public opinion. To engage in media-mediated discussion is to provide “the most important means of social and communication to the public”: an “environment” in which discussions can be “exhaustive, and often in conflict with one another” (Brands, 2002; Grady, 2007, 2011), which is to produce an atmosphere in which “consensus is often necessary and appropriate” (O’Farrell, 2007; O’Callaghan, 2007). The media can be used both to create the common objective that promotes meaningful community interactions and allow community participation (O’Farrell, 2007). Other examples are
Practicalities of Social Engineering and Social Planning
E.G. In a research group, members of the social engineering consortium are asked to apply their expertise to designing, and implementing, social organization strategies that are practical in their personal situations. The research group members are also provided an opportunity to discuss design principles, strategies, technologies and social practices. In some cases, the results from the findings and recommendations discussed in each paper are then presented to other researchers, as well as the members of the project team for further work. Some examples of practicality research:
• Design and implementation of a system for integrating social and economic systems, such as a national health system, the government or a local community
• Design and use social data in order to gain insight into the underlying causes of social change and its social consequences
• Design and use social data to assess human behavior and health in general, in order to build social services services, such as health-related health care
• Research to evaluate health and risk of chronic disease and prevent-able diseases, such as diabetes and heart failure and the developing world’s obesity epidemic
• Create new social and economic systems in order to improve health
• Identify changes or threats, such as increasing poverty caused by the state and environmental degradation caused by economic downturns
• Design and implement new types of welfare services, such as disability and disability-related benefits (DBIs), to prevent chronic illness or injury
• Assign and train teachers, scientists and other researchers that specialize in social science and technology to improve research methods and methodology
• Provide social programs, which focus on new technologies or existing services
• Add new technology to social problems, such as crime and pollution
• Enhance the skills of students, which can lead to enhanced study quality
• Enhance learning of social and economic problems, such as housing and the legal system
• Provide a training program to students to provide research and education skills, including writing, computer science, mathematical analysis, computer science courses, teaching strategies, and reading
• Advance students in their education, such as physical and cognitive science and other natural sciences and the arts
• Develop and support the most successful careers in the social sciences, such as business, economics, engineering, medicine and health care
Learning through research
Practicality research seeks to develop a social model for improving social relations and changing behavior. The research group members are also subject to academic scrutiny, which enables them to gain knowledge of society differently and make social connections. Examples of studies conducted on the following subjects are described in the research group: “Developing the Social Attitudes of Volunteers in Caregivers” in Science.
“Briefing Program” in Sociology and Sociobiology.
“Targets in a
Practicalities of Social Engineering and Social Planning
E.G. In a research group, members of the social engineering consortium are asked to apply their expertise to designing, and implementing, social organization strategies that are practical in their personal situations. The research group members are also provided an opportunity to discuss design principles, strategies, technologies and social practices. In some cases, the results from the findings and recommendations discussed in each paper are then presented to other researchers, as well as the members of the project team for further work. Some examples of practicality research:
• Design and implementation of a system for integrating social and economic systems, such as a national health system, the government or a local community
• Design and use social data in order to gain insight into the underlying causes of social change and its social consequences
• Design and use social data to assess human behavior and health in general, in order to build social services services, such as health-related health care
• Research to evaluate health and risk of chronic disease and prevent-able diseases, such as diabetes and heart failure and the developing world’s obesity epidemic
• Create new social and economic systems in order to improve health
• Identify changes or threats, such as increasing poverty caused by the state and environmental degradation caused by economic downturns
• Design and implement new types of welfare services, such as disability and disability-related benefits (DBIs), to prevent chronic illness or injury
• Assign and train teachers, scientists and other researchers that specialize in social science and technology to improve research methods and methodology
• Provide social programs, which focus on new technologies or existing services
• Add new technology to social problems, such as crime and pollution
• Enhance the skills of students, which can lead to enhanced study quality
• Enhance learning of social and economic problems, such as housing and the legal system
• Provide a training program to students to provide research and education skills, including writing, computer science, mathematical analysis, computer science courses, teaching strategies, and reading
• Advance students in their education, such as physical and cognitive science and other natural sciences and the arts
• Develop and support the most successful careers in the social sciences, such as business, economics, engineering, medicine and health care
Learning through research
Practicality research seeks to develop a social model for improving social relations and changing behavior. The research group members are also subject to academic scrutiny, which enables them to gain knowledge of society differently and make social connections. Examples of studies conducted on the following subjects are described in the research group: “Developing the Social Attitudes of Volunteers in Caregivers” in Science.
“Briefing Program” in Sociology and Sociobiology.
“Targets in a
Practicalities of Social Engineering and Social Planning
E.G. In a research group, members of the social engineering consortium are asked to apply their expertise to designing, and implementing, social organization strategies that are practical in their personal situations. The research group members are also provided an opportunity to discuss design principles, strategies, technologies and social practices. In some cases, the results from the findings and recommendations discussed in each paper are then presented to other researchers, as well as the members of the project team for further work. Some examples of practicality research:
• Design and implementation of a system for integrating social and economic systems, such as a national health system, the government or a local community
• Design and use social data in order to gain insight into the underlying causes of social change and its social consequences
• Design and use social data to assess human behavior and health in general, in order to build social services services, such as health-related health care
• Research to evaluate health and risk of chronic disease and prevent-able diseases, such as diabetes and heart failure and the developing world’s obesity epidemic
• Create new social and economic systems in order to improve health
• Identify changes or threats, such as increasing poverty caused by the state and environmental degradation caused by economic downturns
• Design and implement new types of welfare services, such as disability and disability-related benefits (DBIs), to prevent chronic illness or injury
• Assign and train teachers, scientists and other researchers that specialize in social science and technology to improve research methods and methodology
• Provide social programs, which focus on new technologies or existing services
• Add new technology to social problems, such as crime and pollution
• Enhance the skills of students, which can lead to enhanced study quality
• Enhance learning of social and economic problems, such as housing and the legal system
• Provide a training program to students to provide research and education skills, including writing, computer science, mathematical analysis, computer science courses, teaching strategies, and reading
• Advance students in their education, such as physical and cognitive science and other natural sciences and the arts
• Develop and support the most successful careers in the social sciences, such as business, economics, engineering, medicine and health care
Learning through research
Practicality research seeks to develop a social model for improving social relations and changing behavior. The research group members are also subject to academic scrutiny, which enables them to gain knowledge of society differently and make social connections. Examples of studies conducted on the following subjects are described in the research group: “Developing the Social Attitudes of Volunteers in Caregivers” in Science.
“Briefing Program” in Sociology and Sociobiology.
“Targets in a
The thought of bringing