Essay About Budget Problem And Share Parks

Budget Problem and Its Direct Impact on Publicly Supported University Programs
Essay Preview: Budget Problem and Its Direct Impact on Publicly Supported University Programs
Report this essay
You Decide
Intergovernmental Management
September 23, 2012
You Decide
This current budget problem and its direct impact on publicly supported university programs is in
dire need of a resolution. I understand your concern to establish a swift and effective decision regarding
this issue. Before I offer my advice, I want to share my synopsis of this matter based of the information I
received.
The budget cuts that were approved by the state have led to the elimination of important
programs at the publicly supported universities in your state, and as a direct consequence, certain specific
majors are no longer offered at any of those universities. However, these specific majors are, in fact
offered at a state university in a neighboring state and your states institutions offer programs not
available in the other state. An analyst proposed that an agreement be entered with the neighboring state
to allow reciprocity on in-state tuition for those programs. Some are in support of the interstate compact,
and others are opposed to the idea.
This proposed solution will fall under the Interstate Compact provision, which is a voluntary
arrangement between two or more states that is designed to solve their common problems and that
becomes part of the laws of each state. The most common interstate compacts concern agreements to
share natural resources, such as water; build regional electric power sources; share parks and parkways;
conserve fish and wildlife; protect air quality; manage radioactive and other hazardous wastes; control
natural disasters, such as floods; share educational resources.
The proposal of James Raika definitely falls under this provision. The aforementioned shows that
the interstate Compact Provision includes agreements that allow states to share educational resources.
This specific agreement, proposed by Raika will allow students from both states to enroll in out of state
schools and pay in state rates. This will be greatly beneficial to these students who will experience a
huge burden of paying higher rates because of a budget issue. This is an effective way of alleviating this
problem and offering a viable solution for both states. The only problem with this limited approach is
that it does not provide any solutions specifically for the budget or long-term planning to restore these
You Decide
programs. It may pose a serious concern in the future.
After reviewing Morgan James position, I concluded that she is partially on board with the
provision. Ms. James is wary to rush into an agreement without exploring all possible options that could
bring added value and prove to be even more beneficial to the state. For example, she mentioned the
possibility of entering an agreement with the state that covers any and all cross -border higher
educational issues. The benefits of this approach are collaboration with multiple states, resource
sharing,