Title Ix
Join now to read essay Title Ix
Michael Burch had been the University of California, Davis head mens wrestling coach since 1995. He was employed through one-year contracts and was classified as a part-timer in the athletic department.
UCD acknowledged that the wrestling teams win-loss record, and the wrestling program overall, improved significantly during Burchs tenure. Despite that, on May 29, 2001, the university told Burch his contract would not be renewed.
Burch sued. He accused UCD of retaliation in violation of Title IX. Burch alleged that he was fired because he opposed UCDs sex discrimination against female wrestlers and he publicly advocated for them.
After the court determined that Burch had established a basic case of discrimination, UCD had to give a legitimate explanation for its decision to dismiss him. First, UCD attorneys claimed the decision was made before it learned that Burch was advocating on behalf of the female wrestlers, which is a protected activity under Title IX.
Second, it stated its decision was based on Burchs conflicts within the athletic department, his disregard for rules, his unreasonable demands for more money, his repeated budget deficits, and his failure to cooperate during an investigation into possible National Collegiate Athletic Association violations.
Burch v. Univ. of Cal., No. CV.S 04 0038 WBS GGH (106 LRP 35968) (E.D. Cal. 2006).
Should the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California allow Burch to proceed with his Title IX retaliation claims?
a. No, because UCD had a legitimate explanation for its decision to fire him.
b. No, because the universitys reasons were not legitimate in light of Burchs successful record as coach.
c. Yes, if Burch could show that the universitys articulated reasons were a pretext for discrimination.
d. Yes, because Title IX guarantees plaintiffs a right to a jury trial in all cases of sexual discrimination.
Correct answer: c. Yes
If a university offers a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions, a plaintiff has the chance to show the explanation is merely a pretext for discrimination.
A plaintiff can establish pretext by showing either 1) unlawful discrimination more likely motivated the university, or 2) the universitys given explanation is unworthy of credence because it is inconsistent or otherwise not believable.
To avoid dismissal, Burch had to show the universitys articulated reasons were a pretext for discrimination. He identified several inconstancies in UCDs arguments that cast doubt on the reliability of its explanation.
“The repeated instances where [Burch] has identified weaknesses and contradictions in [UCDs] proffered reasons satisfy the unworthy of credence prong of the pretext analysis and cast sufficient doubt on [UCDs] explanation,” the court stated. It allowed Burchs retaliation case to move forward. As the University of Illinois at Chicagos ombudsman, Caryn Bills knew grievances were increasing. To stem the tide, she helped develop the institutions Dispute Resolutions Services program.
“We chose mediation and went out to vice chancellors and asked them to each identify two people to train,” Bills said. She has run DRS since 1999 and is now the deputy associate chancellor of UICs Office for Access and Equity.
Mediations popularity slowly grew so that by 2005, UIC saw a decrease in external charges. Bills also has shifted from spending 80 percent of her time on equal employment opportunity issues and 20 percent on mediation to a 60-40 EEO/mediation split.
Review her methods for ideas to start mediation, prevent litigation, and improve your environment.
“The goal is to catch problems before they become formal grievances and lawsuits,” Bills said.
A lot must happen before mediation occurs, she noted. First, she meets with a complainant to determine if mediation is appropriate. It is not used to discipline for serious misconduct or terminate for cause, or to appeal negative tenure decisions, Bills explained. Mediation is also not used to investigate or respond to alleged unlawful harassment.
“Its mostly used for communication breakdowns, clarification of roles and responsibilities, and workplace environment issues,” Bills said. Once she and the complainant