Debt-Equity Mix SimulationEssay Preview: Debt-Equity Mix SimulationReport this essayRunning head: DEBT-EQUITY MIX SIMULATIONDebt-Equity Mix SimulationThe investment decision, also known as capital budgeting, is central to the success of the company. Capital budgeting is the process of evaluating and selecting long-term investments (Brealey, Myers, & Marcus, 2007, 189). Managers need to make right investment decisions for the future of the company since not all investments are equally risky. Managers need to know how to calculate the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) in order to find out risks and uncertainty related to capital budgeting. WACC is essential to an organization’s financial success. The WACC allows the leaders of a business to measure the possible effects of different financing alternatives. They must consider the cost of debt and equity components to maximize profitability. This can be done by using the WACC as a benchmark for determining which investments would produce the best results. Managers must look into a firm’s capital structure and assess the weighted costs of common stock, preferred stock, and other debt and equity components that require a rate of return to investors. Managers must calculate such financial statistics to assess whether projects would be beneficial or risky, such as major capital expenditures.
The WACC gives managers a figure by which to pinpoint a company’s cost of capital, as well as acceptable rate of return from proposed ventures. WACC considers the proportional costs of debt and equity components within a company’s capital structure to give the overall cost of capital (Brealey, Myers, & Marcus, 2007, 189). Allowing too much debt in an attempt to lower WACC may lead to bankruptcy. Banking on too much equity could mean that business partners and investors may gain too strong of a stake holding in the business, as seen by the owner’s situation of El Cafĩ. The WACC should guide the components within the capital budget and structure to ensure that a company is making practical business decisions. Managers faced with key business decisions involving financial ventures must ensure that the rate of return on any proposed investment is in fact greater than the WACC
.
Conclusion
Applied economics has developed a new set of tools to assess the impact of business transactions. They make it feasible to study how business transaction efficiency and profitability (AEP) may be negatively impacted in many financial markets. Moreover, they provide the understanding of the consequences of business trading on individual investors’ investments. Using these tools, an assessment of such factors as risk exposure, liquidity, capital accumulation, liquidity availability, and financial conditions underlie a business decision should be made.
Fundamental research, such as studies of investment and operating results, can provide valuable insights into how a business decision affects its cost of capital, risk profile, and results. The WACC must have the resources to do so. ItЬs important that business partners and investors should have the ability to access the results of the study and should be aware of the findings and recommendations in the report of the WACC on the financial decision management. The WACC is a public policy research journal and a place where researchers can receive and critique their research.
References
Breyer, Robert J, & Hirschfeld, Scott L. 2010. Worry and risk: Does the US experience a WACC in the 1980s? A survey of business meetings convened to find the answer to these problems. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(4), 506–518. doi:10.1016/j.jaif.2010.01.026
Brealey, Michael, Eric, & Myers, Carol E. 2007. Factors driving capital transfer from investment in companies with multiple equity portfolios: an assessment by a panel of US managers. Journal of Investment Management, 17(3), 875–806.
Brancato, David R. 1997. Money, Capital, and the Share Market—A Critique. New York: Palgrave, Macmillan, Macmillan, and Co., 1977. Available on request.
Cottrell, William J. 1987. WGA: The Risk Factor. Washington, DC: Author–Author, 1989. Available on request.
DeGropher, D., & Rehman, Richard. 2002. Financial Economics. New York: The MacMillan, MacMillan, and Co., 1977. Available on request.
Diethelm, Peter, & Hirschfeld, Scott L. 2010. WACC’s Role in Business Decision Making: A Review of Developed Econometric Models and the Effects on Risk. Journal of Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(5), 435–460. Available on request.
Eberhart, B., & Mather, M. 2006a. Money, Capital, and the Share Market—A Review of Developed Econometric Models and the Effects on Risk. Journal of Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(6), 564–589. Available on request.
Feldman, Edward. 2003. Financial Markets. New York: The MacMillan, MacMillan, Co., 1970. Available on request.
Friedman, Michael, & Myers, Carol E. 2003. Capital, R&D, and Asset Management in the Developing Developments: Review. American Economic Review: Macroeconomics 6(4), 111–111. Available on request.
Friedman, Michael, & Myers, Carol E. 2003b. Management and Financial Markets. New York: The