Essay About Capital Punishment And Social Order

Capital Punishment
Join now to read essay Capital Punishment
Megan Michaux
Capital Punishment
As part of a democracy, Americans accept the rights of the county, state and
individual. Social order can only exist when people give up the responsibilities of law
enforcement to the government. All fifty states have the right to choose whether or not to
utilize capital punishment. It is legal in thirty-seven of those states. (www) I believe
capital punishment does not violate the Eighth Amendment because it serves as both a
deterrent and retributive purpose. Moral justice can be served through the execution of
the convicted and there are humane ways in which the government can execute.
When the Constitution was drafted, capital punishment was practiced widely in
this country, yet it was not specified as wrong or as cruel and unusual. Many of the
framers and philosophers of the Constitution supported capital punishment. ( Locke)
Citizens under a social contract agree not to kill only because others also agree not to kill.
When that bond of trust is broken, the law must take action to maintain balance within
the economy. I think that it is the function of laws to prevent murder by demonstrating to
everyone that it is not in their best interest to take another person’s life.
Capital punishment is the harshest form of punishment enforced in the United
States today. Once a jury has convicted a criminal, they agree on a punishment. If the
jury recommends capital punishment and the judge agrees, the criminal will then face
some form of execution, a punishment that once performed cannot be reversed. Each year
there are about 250 people added to Death Row and 35 executed. (www) However, I
believe the fear of death discourages people from committing crimes and there must be
fear and intimidation. to achieve model citizens and a better society
Perhaps one of the biggest objections to capital punishment is the immorality of
consenting to kill another human being. Opponents believe that capital punishment is the
permissible legal killing of people and no one, not even the State, has the authority to
play God. Who decides that the convicted life is less important than the lives of other
civilians? Capital punishment can be viewed morally wrong because of its cruel and
inhumane taking of a human life. In fact there was a period from 1972 to 1976 that
capital punishment was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. Their reason for
this decision was that it violated the Eighth Amendment and was seen as cruel and
unusual punishment. (www) The different methods of execution can actually involve
physical torture. There have been cases where electrocution has not successfully killed
the condemned on the first application and the convicted has had to suffer extreme burns
and torment, as they are shocked a second time. (Block) Capital punishment is a
retributive justice, and no direct relation to murder rates can be logically applied.
In opposition to the objections of capital punishment, I must clearly state that in
the case of murder, a crime that receives execution in most cases, the damage cannot be
reversed. The life of the victim no longer exists and nothing can be done to retrieve it.
The lesson that the criminal is taught, in turn, should be one that cannot be reversed.
Capital punishment teaches a lesson while the convicted criminal awaits