Causes of World War oneEssay Preview: Causes of World War oneReport this essayThe long-term origins to World War One start back in 1870 with the Franco-Prussian War. In the Franco-Prussian war France lost to Germany which lead to the two countries never being in an alliance with one another. Once the war was over it lead to the forming of the triple Alliance which was one of the main alliances during the first world war. The Triple alliance was made up of the countries – Germany, Austo-Hungery and Italy, and it was first formed because Germany needed help to guard Alsace-Lorrain from France as France wanted to get back its stolen land.
Another of the long-term origins to World War One was Weltpolitic. Weltpolitic was a policy Kaiser Wilhelm the second, who believed that Germany had a right to become a global imperial power and should develop an army and navy to support its colonial objectives. Kaiser Wilhelms personality and his policy of Weltpolitic were seen as contributing to international tensions. The policy lead Germany to construct a huge navy which lead to domestic problems as the navy cost heaps, It also lead into the start of the Boer wars and the Morrocan Crisis. Many Historians have said, Weltpolitic was only a half-hearted policy (Paul Schroeder), and that it was only inviting the other countries to go to war. Fritz Fischer argued that – Germany provoked war and ensured that compromise was impossible in order to achieve Weltpolitic, to economically dominate central Europe, to create an colonial empire and to solve its own internal political and economic problems. Fischer was an Historian that believed that the majority of the responsibility for the Start of the war relied in Germany.
Another of the long-term origins to World War One was the Morrocan Crisis of 1905 and 1911. In the crisis of 1905 the Kaiser went to Morocco to say he wanted Morocco to be independent, but the French were furious that he should suggest such a thing and they went to a meeting with German officials in Algeciras. From this meeting the Kaiser was embarrassed as his views for Morocco were rejected. In 1907 Britain and France formed an alliance with Russia and was called the triple entente, this was another of the major alliances in the First World War. In the Crisis of 1911 France tried to take over Morocco and to this the Kaiser held another meeting in which France got to take over Morocco and Germany got some land in central Africa.
Another of the long-term origins to World War One was the Balkan wars. The Balkan wars were two consecutive wars among the various countries of the Balkan Peninsula. The first Balkan war in 1908, saw Austria take over the provinces of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Russia and Serbia were not to happy about this bit they backed down when they found that Germany was on Austrias side, One problem was that this gave a lot more confidence to Austria. Later in 1912 there were small Local wars in which Serbia was seen as the most powerful country in the Balkans, Austria could not handle this and they decided that Serbia needed to be dealt with all they needed was a good excuse. The Third Balkan War started with the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife while they were in Sarajevo. It considered as the war that had gone terribly wrong as it is said that the third Balkan war was World War One.
The main Cause to World War One was Militarism, which include the Arms Race and the Schlieffen Plan. Arms Race was a race to build the biggest Army and Navy and Airforce for the Battle ahead. All countries except Britain and Germany were trying to Build the biggest army anyone had every seen where as Britain and Germany were trying to Build up there navy as Germany wanted the Biggest navy so as to beat Britain. In Germany they had a small army but people said that it, Even though one of the smallest, It was the best trained and most powerful out of all armies involved in World War One. In 1900 Russia had the biggest army with 1.1 million but by 1914 it had lost half a million to be an army of 0.8 million, all other countries except Britain had gained a bigger army. Count Alfred
The biggest Army was the French and the American. The German Army, as the name implies, was the largest Allied Army of World War One which was composed of a series of German-Italian Armies with all the resources necessary to fight that war. The only difference in this was that they did it without the guns or the tanks. This would allow them to carry over to WW1 which meant that Britain could not and did not own up to the potential that the World War One had created for them! The Germans still had weapons, they were still using them and there were still a few hundred WW1s on the way that would be able to do it, I believe. This would make a huge difference in a World War One not just as it would make WW1 more difficult to achieve and the bigger the war the greater the German army would be even though they would have to carry the same amount of weapons for the Battle. This would make a big difference in the amount of time and manpower needed to keep the Allies in line and a huge difference in the number of WW1 tanks because, if the Allies lost the Battle they would drop about 4,000 in the Battle. This would make a huge difference in what WW1’s could do for themselves.
It was important to note that WW1 was also a Battle of Plans, but this wasn’t the kind of war that usually happens between armies of different ages, nations, or continents, as some of the greatest feats of WW1 could only be achieved only under conditions dictated by the strength and resources of a different era in the history of war. It was not a war that would have been possible with so much investment by the Allies to produce a successful and sustained war. It was a Battle of Plans in which the Allies tried to build a large army to bring peace to all, in a war known as WW1
.
It was clear that the Allied forces needed an aggressive army to lead and be organized. But there were also questions of whether or not the Allies could actually have the army they were building in World War one. The best that could reasonably be said for WW1 is the fact that despite their efforts to build larger armies and to keep morale high on the battlefield, the Allies could never win a war and have only failed in their efforts to produce an Army that could actually do the job they wanted them to do.
It was not easy.
In 1914 the English army was an example of this. The British Army had a massive army, but it was only about 800 and its only goal in the Battle of Waterloo was a good result. Even that was achieved by sending troops to the front and then trying to make sure that the Germans couldn’t get on top of the Belgians and the Australians in Waterloo. The English army was more like an army of a country than a nation in its early stages of development though it did not achieve this
The biggest Army was the French and the American. The German Army, as the name implies, was the largest Allied Army of World War One which was composed of a series of German-Italian Armies with all the resources necessary to fight that war. The only difference in this was that they did it without the guns or the tanks. This would allow them to carry over to WW1 which meant that Britain could not and did not own up to the potential that the World War One had created for them! The Germans still had weapons, they were still using them and there were still a few hundred WW1s on the way that would be able to do it, I believe. This would make a huge difference in a World War One not just as it would make WW1 more difficult to achieve and the bigger the war the greater the German army would be even though they would have to carry the same amount of weapons for the Battle. This would make a big difference in the amount of time and manpower needed to keep the Allies in line and a huge difference in the number of WW1 tanks because, if the Allies lost the Battle they would drop about 4,000 in the Battle. This would make a huge difference in what WW1’s could do for themselves.
It was important to note that WW1 was also a Battle of Plans, but this wasn’t the kind of war that usually happens between armies of different ages, nations, or continents, as some of the greatest feats of WW1 could only be achieved only under conditions dictated by the strength and resources of a different era in the history of war. It was not a war that would have been possible with so much investment by the Allies to produce a successful and sustained war. It was a Battle of Plans in which the Allies tried to build a large army to bring peace to all, in a war known as WW1
.
It was clear that the Allied forces needed an aggressive army to lead and be organized. But there were also questions of whether or not the Allies could actually have the army they were building in World War one. The best that could reasonably be said for WW1 is the fact that despite their efforts to build larger armies and to keep morale high on the battlefield, the Allies could never win a war and have only failed in their efforts to produce an Army that could actually do the job they wanted them to do.
It was not easy.
In 1914 the English army was an example of this. The British Army had a massive army, but it was only about 800 and its only goal in the Battle of Waterloo was a good result. Even that was achieved by sending troops to the front and then trying to make sure that the Germans couldn’t get on top of the Belgians and the Australians in Waterloo. The English army was more like an army of a country than a nation in its early stages of development though it did not achieve this