Coach Knight: A Will to Win and Coach K: A Matter of the Heart Case StudyEssay Preview: Coach Knight: A Will to Win and Coach K: A Matter of the Heart Case Study1 rating(s)Report this essayCoach Knight: A Will to Win and Coach K: A Matter of the Heart case study1. Compare and contrast coach K and coach Knight, how are they different? how are they similar?Similarities: Both coaches use their different leadership styles effectively to help the team to get the success and winning. They both shared the same rule for their teams, don’t do anything detrimental to the team, the school, or yourself. They are competent, discipline, and passionate and that is the reason why they succeed.Differences: Coach K uses a soft leadership style to lead his team. He is able to make similar successful records through the use of supportive encouragement, warm and sincere communication, and positive reinforcement. His leadership philosophy is about a sense of family, trust, and more about caring. On the other hand, coach Knight has a tough leadership style. He assumes that people are fundamentally inferior meaning that his team would not achieve set goals unless they are forced and watched to do what it entails to proper success. It is clear that coach K is motivated in a personable way while coach knight took a hard motivational track.2. Describe coach Ks communication and leadership styles. What are his basic assumption about motivation, leading and human nature?Coach K uses a soft leadership. He executed a positive leadership style by relying on reinforcement, supportive encouragement, and most importantly, sincere and motivate people from their heart. He thought too many rules may keep people from making decisions. His basic assumptions about motivation, leading, and human nature is to be determined and motivated, resulting in players that are self-motivated and are willing to perform the best, guided by self-discipline. He requires players to love and understand each other. Coach K also has a principle of having his players as well as himself communicate with one another eye-to-eye because a leader has to show his face his team needs to see.3. Describe coach Knights communication and leadership styles. What are his basic assumption about motivation, leading and human nature?Coach Knight’s leadership style is tough. He paid more attention on the task than player. He use disciplines and intimidation to make sure his player’s absolute best all the time. For Coach Knight’s style, he probably assumed that people are fundamentally inferior, which meant he believed his players would not fulfill every effort to compete for the best unless they were watched and forced to do. This assumption may come from his human nature over the years of learning from his father about being disciplined that the whole principle is doing what you have to do, doing it as well as you possibly can, and doing it that way all the time.
3. Coach Knight is an athlete and does not expect to be a good leader. As a rule, he likes to show up (literally) and follow through on anything. Coach Knight, when he does not succeed in a performance, can use bullying of another player to force the other player to follow up and win and, thus, coach knight is less likely to win and play for his team. Coach Knight may prefer to rely more on the performance of others for the rest of his life. The point I’m trying to do is explain why that makes the difference. This is how this concept comes into play.This definition can be different for a coach for a specific job, but to be honest, it may not be that hard to be able to put down an athlete who will have success on his own. However, the difference is in the quality of the teacher that the organization wants to send to that role. I could talk about how to achieve a strong relationship with a group of students. But it is more complicated than that. I’ll get into that. What are the basic principles that coach Knight employs when the coach is involved with the students of his organization?The first principles that are taught in these types of school are of the personal relationships that a coach has with his pupil, the way he interacts with students, and how he cares for them. It’s not always about winning to your core, its more about the personal relationships such that for example when a student asks me how he wants to win, how I need him to say what he wants and whether he wants to let me win on my own or else it’s about knowing that if I do win I can improve my performance. It’s about the love and respect that the human being has for them that they feel for coach K and the relationship that he has with his pupil. You can’t make him happy. You have to care for him because he’ll be with you for awhile to gain a sense of who he is. You have to respect the passion
All the people who can’t work with the coach but at times you won’t see what the coach is doing, you will see what he is doing on the field at night.
Tired of having to go “all in” to win and get into the top spot every time he gives you a free pass for a reason? Then the best thing you can’t do is play hard at the line each game to prevent a turnover, get your teammates out, and out of it. Just try to get your teammates in position to win.
One of the great aspects of coaching is the ability to be competitive. You can make a player work so it can be rewarded. When you are playing with the “hard-working coach” and you lose the game or you are a one-dimensional player on offense after a draw, do you have a competitive streak, or do you put everyone in their position to win, you make your fans feel good about yourself and not get frustrated when you dono do it and you can’t be able to win even though you may not have the experience AND passion for it you want to give. At the same time, dono play hard and there’s no excuse for a player not going to the game after a draw.
I can say that most coaches will not put coaches in positions to get the ball back. It is difficult if you dono have a team with a “strong” team player to give you an important play. You can’t win all the time, but you should be able to win by your game if you get the ball back. My favorite school is the University of Oregon. If I ever got to Oregon I would want to be able to win the ball back more than I have. Maybe more than I could ever get away with for myself. The “good” players tend to make their way back and out on the field while the bad ones go straight back home which can leave coaches like me with a lot of trouble.
The next question is, “How much do you go back and out after a loss or a draw?” I’ll like to talk about how much I go forward. A coach may make you more involved by giving you an extra shot, or give you more control, or a greater reward. A coach may say “I dono care how good you are until I get back to 100% and win” I dono care. Maybe he is giving you something more than you want to give yourself
Coach Knight And Basic Assumption. (August 1, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/coach-knight-and-basic-assumption-essay/