Global Human Resource Management at Coca-ColaEssay Preview: Global Human Resource Management at Coca-ColaReport this essayGlobal Human Resource Management at Coca-ColaThe Coca-Cola is firm is one of the most successful multinational company in the world. Although it is an American company 80 precent of its profits comes from outside the United States. The story behind that it is the success in home country .the success in United States has inspired the executive in the enterprise to expand their business outside the firms home. When the company implemented its plan to set business in foreign countries, the company had been forcing difficulties that the executive had taken into consideration .the executives then realised that there is no trouble with the product but the trouble is with how to manage the company in a country which has a different culture.
Global Human Resource Management at Coca-ColaA company based in China where the company’s main customer is global health as a part of their efforts. Coke has a strong commitment to help the citizens of a developing country become more conscious of its global health and environmental benefits.The Coca-Cola Global Sustainable Development Fund is a multi-billion dollar global organization that promotes the sustainability of the production and distribution of natural substances and environmental products to the world’s 1.2 billion population .it aims to create the foundation for one in four people to achieve their living standards within the next 30 years. More than 3.5 million people around the world will be affected by carbon emission due to the global warming that is causing this huge change. There are many solutions that the Coca-Cola team seeks to offer to the public which do not aim towards the development of global global health and environmental values. What is the Coca-Cola Global Sustainable Development Fund? The Global Sustainable Development Fund is funded by Coca-Cola with all proceeds being distributed to the World Health Organization. Coca-Cola aims to create the model of Global Sustainable Development Fund and then to meet the challenge in the developing world of developing a global environmental environment. The World Health Organization and Coca-Cola have already established an understanding and cooperation program developing policies to manage a new sustainable development system by using a global scale and collaboration approach with over 300 NGOs such as the Earth and Climate Change Research Centre (E-NCRc) of E.W. Bush. All this is designed to raise awareness around the new sustainable development system and to create trust, solidarity and understanding with the majority of the global population. The Coca-Cola Global Sustainable Development Fund aims to develop a foundation for a world based environment to benefit the nation’s people – as will being globally affected by global warming and climate change and a world where the health, safety and social well-being of people comes first and the quality of life of people comes last.The Coca-Cola Global Sustainable Development Fund has been created as a partnership between Coca-Cola, the Ecotourism Center and the Government of Peru. To ensure that the Coca-Cola Global Sustainable Development Fund provides the most support to the people of Peru and other developing countries, the Coca-Cola Global Sustainable Development Fund provides grants of $10 million to the Coca-Cola Global Sustainable Development Fund as well as a $500,000 bonus over 2 years to local NGOs to help them develop their sustainable development practice. The Coca-Cola Global Sustainable Development Fund provides financial support from all levels of PepsiCo and Coca-Cola. Global Sustainable Development Programme. The Coca-Cola Global Sustainable Development Programme was established in 2011, in an effort to increase awareness that the Coca-Cola Company is making environmental sustainability a priority from around the world. The Global Sustainable Development Programme has been developed to allow a range of organisations and individuals to meet the need for a sustainable development approach that would not only benefit global health and environmental rights, but also the people’s well-being. The Global Sustainable Development Programme provides a range of support to local authorities to help them promote the sustainability of the environment by using a sustainable development approach – one that does not aim to create global problems, but rather offers a chance for sustainable action. For example, one of the benefits of sustainable development is that it is open to everyone. By making it open to everyone, a solution like the Global Sustainable Development Programme will reduce the impact of global warming and bring about the increase, by reducing pollution, of greenhouse gas emissions. The Global Sustainable Development
Bibliography:
Nelson, Michael. (2013-12-23) The Power of Innovation. Washington, DC.: American Library Association.
Cameron, A. A. (1981). “On the Social Effects of Business.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(3), 507 – 489. doi: 10.1057/2014/115947
Dixon C, Miller J, and Shindler R, (2010). “The impact of U.S. and international corporate practices on corporate tax policies, taxes, and corporate incentives.” Social Indicators Research 46(1), 23-34. In a study of U.S. social science research, the authors note that, since the Great Recession, these measures have been concentrated in the form of policies that are highly targeted. In particular, the findings suggest that high corporate rate laws are being imposed in a way that is highly targeted even in very important areas, as in many other areas of the world such as North America, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and the Middle East. Furthermore, a study of corporate taxes in the United States finds that the U.S. corporate tax rate is one of the highest in the developed world, at 7.8%:[1]The authors conclude by noting that while U.S. corporate tax rates are lower than Western European and Asian tax bases, those in their countries pay a significant proportion of the average corporate rate.[2] They note, moreover, that taxes in U.S. corporations vary according to the type of companies they serve and how efficiently they use those revenues. According to the authors, the overall income from the U.S. public sector is $6,932 at best.[3] The authors also note the increased use of public corporate tax loopholes to benefit from the higher corporate rates. This is because U.S. corporate companies, for the most part, operate in very small to mid-sized operations, which benefit the vast majority of public sector workers.[4] This is reflected in high corporate tax rates and other incentives. This increased use of tax breaks for companies that are located in large, high-tax, high-margin regions of the U.S. contributes to a higher proportion of the U.S. population being treated better even as other states are benefiting from higher tax rates. The authors note some evidence in the American Journal of Educational Management that U.S. tax rates do not change with time as these regions and states vary widely in their financial and technological sophistication. However, some have speculated that the influence of this effect on American society is not just due to income but is also an effect of state taxation and corporate tax policies, for instance, which may be a strong determinant of how competitive and profitable private/public industry (or even some other sector) in certain sectors are. The authors further state that, because the rate of corporate tax is higher than in other countries in tax policy, it may be possible that the tax rates and tax exemptions provided by the federal government to individual citizens should be higher in those nations on the higher corporate tax rates. Further the authors note, that the highest corporate tax rates in those countries are among private sector firms where a large portion of profits flow to the Government and those in government are also large employers. The authors note that a tax break for certain private sector companies is not part of that incentive, but may be more important in their case, to help them overcome the
Bibliography:
Nelson, Michael. (2013-12-23) The Power of Innovation. Washington, DC.: American Library Association.
Cameron, A. A. (1981). “On the Social Effects of Business.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(3), 507 – 489. doi: 10.1057/2014/115947
Dixon C, Miller J, and Shindler R, (2010). “The impact of U.S. and international corporate practices on corporate tax policies, taxes, and corporate incentives.” Social Indicators Research 46(1), 23-34. In a study of U.S. social science research, the authors note that, since the Great Recession, these measures have been concentrated in the form of policies that are highly targeted. In particular, the findings suggest that high corporate rate laws are being imposed in a way that is highly targeted even in very important areas, as in many other areas of the world such as North America, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and the Middle East. Furthermore, a study of corporate taxes in the United States finds that the U.S. corporate tax rate is one of the highest in the developed world, at 7.8%:[1]The authors conclude by noting that while U.S. corporate tax rates are lower than Western European and Asian tax bases, those in their countries pay a significant proportion of the average corporate rate.[2] They note, moreover, that taxes in U.S. corporations vary according to the type of companies they serve and how efficiently they use those revenues. According to the authors, the overall income from the U.S. public sector is $6,932 at best.[3] The authors also note the increased use of public corporate tax loopholes to benefit from the higher corporate rates. This is because U.S. corporate companies, for the most part, operate in very small to mid-sized operations, which benefit the vast majority of public sector workers.[4] This is reflected in high corporate tax rates and other incentives. This increased use of tax breaks for companies that are located in large, high-tax, high-margin regions of the U.S. contributes to a higher proportion of the U.S. population being treated better even as other states are benefiting from higher tax rates. The authors note some evidence in the American Journal of Educational Management that U.S. tax rates do not change with time as these regions and states vary widely in their financial and technological sophistication. However, some have speculated that the influence of this effect on American society is not just due to income but is also an effect of state taxation and corporate tax policies, for instance, which may be a strong determinant of how competitive and profitable private/public industry (or even some other sector) in certain sectors are. The authors further state that, because the rate of corporate tax is higher than in other countries in tax policy, it may be possible that the tax rates and tax exemptions provided by the federal government to individual citizens should be higher in those nations on the higher corporate tax rates. Further the authors note, that the highest corporate tax rates in those countries are among private sector firms where a large portion of profits flow to the Government and those in government are also large employers. The authors note that a tax break for certain private sector companies is not part of that incentive, but may be more important in their case, to help them overcome the
Bibliography:
Nelson, Michael. (2013-12-23) The Power of Innovation. Washington, DC.: American Library Association.
Cameron, A. A. (1981). “On the Social Effects of Business.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(3), 507 – 489. doi: 10.1057/2014/115947
Dixon C, Miller J, and Shindler R, (2010). “The impact of U.S. and international corporate practices on corporate tax policies, taxes, and corporate incentives.” Social Indicators Research 46(1), 23-34. In a study of U.S. social science research, the authors note that, since the Great Recession, these measures have been concentrated in the form of policies that are highly targeted. In particular, the findings suggest that high corporate rate laws are being imposed in a way that is highly targeted even in very important areas, as in many other areas of the world such as North America, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and the Middle East. Furthermore, a study of corporate taxes in the United States finds that the U.S. corporate tax rate is one of the highest in the developed world, at 7.8%:[1]The authors conclude by noting that while U.S. corporate tax rates are lower than Western European and Asian tax bases, those in their countries pay a significant proportion of the average corporate rate.[2] They note, moreover, that taxes in U.S. corporations vary according to the type of companies they serve and how efficiently they use those revenues. According to the authors, the overall income from the U.S. public sector is $6,932 at best.[3] The authors also note the increased use of public corporate tax loopholes to benefit from the higher corporate rates. This is because U.S. corporate companies, for the most part, operate in very small to mid-sized operations, which benefit the vast majority of public sector workers.[4] This is reflected in high corporate tax rates and other incentives. This increased use of tax breaks for companies that are located in large, high-tax, high-margin regions of the U.S. contributes to a higher proportion of the U.S. population being treated better even as other states are benefiting from higher tax rates. The authors note some evidence in the American Journal of Educational Management that U.S. tax rates do not change with time as these regions and states vary widely in their financial and technological sophistication. However, some have speculated that the influence of this effect on American society is not just due to income but is also an effect of state taxation and corporate tax policies, for instance, which may be a strong determinant of how competitive and profitable private/public industry (or even some other sector) in certain sectors are. The authors further state that, because the rate of corporate tax is higher than in other countries in tax policy, it may be possible that the tax rates and tax exemptions provided by the federal government to individual citizens should be higher in those nations on the higher corporate tax rates. Further the authors note, that the highest corporate tax rates in those countries are among private sector firms where a large portion of profits flow to the Government and those in government are also large employers. The authors note that a tax break for certain private sector companies is not part of that incentive, but may be more important in their case, to help them overcome the
In this essay, we will answer some questions that are talking about the policy and strategy that Coca Cola applied in foreign country.What is Coca Colas staffing policy for managerial position; Ethnocentric, Polycentric, or Geocentric? Does this policy make sense?First of all, it is obvious that multinational companies vary in implementing the international human resource policy. Ethnocentric policy means that company receives grants and decisions from head quarter .the significant point in local and external procedures have been managed by headquarter staffs, and the grants are execute by workers in the headquarter.
Polycentric means that subsidiary is considered as an international unit which is managed by native residents who are not often sent to work in headquarter, and the workers in the original company are not often sent to foreign countries.
Geocentric means that each part (headquarter and subsidiary are shared in all the tasks, and the headquarter applies a global approach to manage its operation in distant countries.
Coca Cola company realizes its assignment to develop and provide local businesses relying on philosophy approach by getting the workers in foreign country salary which is the same amount that