Essay About Cognitive-Behavioral Family Therapy Applied And Virginia Satirs Approach

Aspects of Experiential and Cognitive-Behavioral Family Therapy Applied – Family Systems Theory
Join now to read essay Aspects of Experiential and Cognitive-Behavioral Family Therapy Applied – Family Systems Theory
Aspects of Experiential and Cognitive-Behavioral Family Therapy Applied
Godzilla
Family Systems Theory
Monster University
Aspects of Experiential and Cognitive-Behavioral Family Therapy Applied
Family therapy has traversed a varied and undulating path, while being influence by a
multitude of psychological models. Ally& Bacon (1998a) describe various aspects of
psychodynamic and humanistic theory, other individual psychology approaches, marriage
counseling, child guidance, social psychology, group dynamics, and more in-depth foci on
family structures and processes. Two categories of therapies will receive focus in this paper:
Experiential Family Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral therapies, both of which draw heavily
from theories which focus primarily on the individual.
Virginia Satirs approach to Experiential Family Therapy will be examined. The goal will
to present a summary of some of the highlights, rather than an exhaustive examination. Certain
aspects of general Cognitive and Behavioral psychology will be noted. One main objective will
be to draw from these therapies while presenting a brief approach to family counseling unique to
this paper. The main concepts of this approach will be applied to a case study of a family unit.
There will admittedly be a limited treatment of the more complex systemic family therapies. This
will hopefully provide an interesting overview of a creative synthesis of ideas, and a general
application of individual and family therapeutic strategies.
Satirs Experiential/Humanistic Overview
Virginia Satir was a pioneer in the field of experiential family therapy. Satirs work has
received both commendation for its compassion and criticism for its lack of scientific
underpinning (Family Therapy, 2006). Her beliefs were considered to be counter to the then
prevalent emphasis on scientific research and theory development in family therapy circles
(Family Therapy, 1998). Nichols and Schwartz (2004) viewed the original contributions of Satir
and other experiential family therapists to be somewhat a product of a bygone era, yielding to
more in-depth family systems theories. It was acknowledged that experiential approaches have
been incorporated in the later models of Greenberg and Johnson, and of Schwartz.
Satir did, however, believe that one family members behavior affected other family
members, which was evidenced by symptom sharing (Linda M. Woolf, n.d.). This had lead to the
idea that families must be treated as units, with therapy focusing on the family as an
interdependent whole. Positing the view that families are more than groups of individuals, but a
whole that was more than the sum of its parts, indicates a relationship to Gestalt psychology and
constructivism. While individuals do need specific counseling at times, therapists dealing with
families must not lose sight of the forest because of looking at the trees. Satirs approach does, to
some degree, address family issues from a systems standpoint.
Satir valued compassion and feelings as part of the therapy encounter, while stressing the
importance of caring and acceptance in the development of healthy relationships (Virginia Satir,
1998). Satir believed in the encompassing effects of communication on all human interaction
(Mathews, 1994). Communication was viewed as involving what is said, how it