Imp 2 Pow 8 Just Count the Pegs
Imp 2 Pow 8 Just Count the Pegs
Problem Statement
My task was to find 3 equations, that would give me an answer, if I had certain information. The first was to find one that if you knew that there were four pegs on the boundary, and none on the interior, you could get the area. The second was if you knew that there were 4 pegs on the boundary, and you knew how many were on the interior, you could get the area. And last, if you had the number on the interior, and the number on the boundary, you could get the area.
Process
The first two equations, were a preparation for the final, building up towards the complete idea. This helped, because I could complete the first two pretty quickly.
For Freddie I drew a 3 column T-Table, with a drawing of the figure, the number of Pegs (in), and the Area (out). I looked for a pattern between the in and the out, and quickly found one that made sense, and I worked it into a formula. I got X/2-1=Y. Where X is IN (number of pegs) and Y is OUT (Area). This works in all shapes with no interior pegs, like Freddie described. I attached this T-Table.
For Sally I followed my luck of the 3 column T-Table, and drew another with the same guidelines. The figure, the interior pegs (in), and the area (out). After I filled in a few figures, and their properties, I noticed a pattern, and not long after, a formula, which worked for them. It was X+1=Y. This T-Table is also attached.
Nowthe next was not so easy. Frashys required a long thought process, and several hours thinking it over, logically. I thought that this next equation would be a combination of the two, it would have to incorporate what I had found out from both of the above. Especially the first. So I thought to myself what this equation, or formula, would have to include. And realized there wasnt 1 variable, but 2. Because it has the variable from the first, and the second problem. 1: The number of pegs on the border, and 2: The number of pegs on the interior. So this means that there are 2 INs. And operations on the two variables will give me my out. So then I went to the T-Table, the perfect tool for seeing patterns. This time I had 4 columns and extra for my extra variable. I had the figure in one column, then the pegs on the interior, pegs on the boundary, and finally, the area. I started drawing shapes, and then filling in their properties, as I did earlier. Until I had about 5 or 6. I then started to look at the numbers, hoping to find a pattern of some sort. I didnt. I then put the table entries I had, into order, by the area. This helped a lot, so I could see how the different shapes related. I noticed patterns in groups, I saw a pattern if there were 0 pegs on the interior, or 1 peg on the interior, but not one that flowed through-out them all. It was very frustrating.
Then I tried to work with the equations I already had, from the other two. I started with the first, X/2-1=Y and I thought, if I were to add the other variable (which I called I, standing for interior) where would it go in? So I tried placing it in the equation, because I saw that it would fit in, and make sense. So I had X/2-1+I=Y . This worked beautifully. I tried plugging-in different values to checked it from my table, and they worked. So I have the answer.
Solution
So I have found each persons formula. Freddie, Sally, and Frashy. I found each of them using mental thought process by looking at the values I got on an in/out table. For Freddies, I had to find a formula that gave me the area if I knew the boundaries, if the interior was empty.