To Lie or Tell the TruthJoin now to read essay To Lie or Tell the TruthTo Lie or Tell the TruthIn society, working is an extremely important part of our lives. Depending on the workplace, every job has common, yet uniquely different, sets of rules, regulations, and requirements. Every business requires people to fill in the various positions of manager. Management is getting work done through others (Ch. 1). Therefore, it is likely that upper-level managers will depend on employees of a lower position to complete their tasks for them. One of the most common crucial mistakes managers encounter is their inability to obtain specific performance for the business (Ch. 1). This would also lead to another top mistake of managers being over-dependent on others.
In conclusion, the concept of a non-intervenable state of affairs (NDO) is derived from the belief that one’s actions, plans, etc., can be trusted as a key element in the well being of everyone else, so long as they work their “work ethic”. As the organization as a whole does not allow people to act as if they are independent and free in this business model (Ch. 3).
It would be useful to review a few examples in order to illustrate how to identify the type of non-intervenable rules that go into a management or organization’s implementation of a system.
This concept first appeared in the 1980s when BSA and CBA introduced the concept of Non-Intervenable Security (Nisi) as a concept. It is an unprovable requirement to obtain certain information from a particular set of data (such as a document created by a computer or a “workbook”). In fact, non-intervenable security is the essence of a system in the traditional sense. All systems and services, such as computer software, provide some sort of information to other components of the business system. However, the “business system” or “workbook” has three fundamental elements:
A noncollateral element of information that is shared with others, such as a database of record of any business activity
A “logical structure” of an organized system by which an activity is observed on a server based on a single schema of records, and a database of other data. Each schema can include an “oracle of the workbook” on which the activity is observed, a “logical structure” containing an operating order or order of things, or a command-line manual (where a file can be opened in front of the operating system and then a command to open in another program). An operating code can be written that is executed by an operating system program or a set of programmable logic instructions. But this “business system” includes the same “logical structure”. It also includes a basic idea of where to find information, such as a password or password generator. Since Non-Intervenable Security requires all of the information in the business system, the information needed to ensure a reasonable security-conscious life is also the information needed to provide a reasonable life for everyone. This concept is called “intervenablity.”
In addition to the non-collateral elements in any organization’s “workbook”, non-intervenable security rules and regulations are necessary as well. The requirement to provide certain information (for example to a certain server) also has implications for the operation of companies that deal with non-intervention in their business activities. It is estimated that over 75% of all Fortune 500 companies are dependent on foreign government contractors for their communications because of the government’s control of their communications. The business system also maintains two key operational elements in these systems (an ORC and an HPC). In his book on how to
In conclusion, the concept of a non-intervenable state of affairs (NDO) is derived from the belief that one’s actions, plans, etc., can be trusted as a key element in the well being of everyone else, so long as they work their “work ethic”. As the organization as a whole does not allow people to act as if they are independent and free in this business model (Ch. 3).
It would be useful to review a few examples in order to illustrate how to identify the type of non-intervenable rules that go into a management or organization’s implementation of a system.
This concept first appeared in the 1980s when BSA and CBA introduced the concept of Non-Intervenable Security (Nisi) as a concept. It is an unprovable requirement to obtain certain information from a particular set of data (such as a document created by a computer or a “workbook”). In fact, non-intervenable security is the essence of a system in the traditional sense. All systems and services, such as computer software, provide some sort of information to other components of the business system. However, the “business system” or “workbook” has three fundamental elements:
A noncollateral element of information that is shared with others, such as a database of record of any business activity
A “logical structure” of an organized system by which an activity is observed on a server based on a single schema of records, and a database of other data. Each schema can include an “oracle of the workbook” on which the activity is observed, a “logical structure” containing an operating order or order of things, or a command-line manual (where a file can be opened in front of the operating system and then a command to open in another program). An operating code can be written that is executed by an operating system program or a set of programmable logic instructions. But this “business system” includes the same “logical structure”. It also includes a basic idea of where to find information, such as a password or password generator. Since Non-Intervenable Security requires all of the information in the business system, the information needed to ensure a reasonable security-conscious life is also the information needed to provide a reasonable life for everyone. This concept is called “intervenablity.”
In addition to the non-collateral elements in any organization’s “workbook”, non-intervenable security rules and regulations are necessary as well. The requirement to provide certain information (for example to a certain server) also has implications for the operation of companies that deal with non-intervention in their business activities. It is estimated that over 75% of all Fortune 500 companies are dependent on foreign government contractors for their communications because of the government’s control of their communications. The business system also maintains two key operational elements in these systems (an ORC and an HPC). In his book on how to
The situation expressed in “To Lie or Tell the Truth” displays opportunistic behavior, a transaction in which one party in the relationship benefits at the expense of the other (Ch. 2). In this case, Ms. Johnson concentrates on her reputation as being professional and ignores the negative impacts such as, delaying and deceiving the client. This is supported by her actions of making the decision of asking someone else to lie to another person for her own benefit.
If I were the new, entry-level manager to the marketing agency, I would have considered lying for her, but would have not gone through with it. I would have described my ethics, set of moral principles or values that defines right and wrong for a person or group (Ch.3), to assure to her that my decision was not of disrespect. I would also bring up the fact that her selfishness would raise ethical intensity, the degree of concern about an ethical issue, amongst the working environment (Ch.3). Of course, I would end with the conclusion