Technology and the Human Condition
Essay Preview: Technology and the Human Condition
Report this essay
We cannot know the future, but we see trends happening now that can be projected forward. In 1965, Gordon Moore, co-founder of chip maker Intel, put forth an axiom that became known as Moores Law. Moore stated that every year since 1959 the number of components on a microchip had doubled. Moore predicted that this trend would continue until 1975. . . He was wrong. The computer industry turned Moores axiom into a general law. Further investigation showed that the law held as far back as the 1940s, if the time frame for doubling is adjusted to 18 months, rather than one year. As 1975 came and went it also became clear that Moores Law was headed into the future with no signs of failing. The law is now treated as a summary statement that every 18 months a new chip goes on the market that is twice as fast as its predecessor, has twice the memory, is cheaper, and more compact. Now Moore himself is predicting that Moores Law is about to end due to the fact that the number of transistors doubling can continue as long as micronization continues. Power consumption was never considered in the original axiom and so without some new kind of power technology Moores law will stall.(Wired, April 2004) “Every two years more computers are produced than existed on the planet previously.” (Andy Grove, CEO, Intel Corporation)
The number of lines of code written for computer programs is doubling faster than 18 months. Microsofts word processing program had 27,000 lines of code when it was first released. By 1995 Microsoft Word had two million lines of code. The next version will have four million, then eight, sixteen, doubling every 12 to 18 months. The internet is doubling in size every year.(UC Regents Report) World wide web pages are doubling every 50 days. The power of a computer network has been defined as the square of the number of users on the network. This means that the power of the world wide web is quadrupling every 50 days. Raymond Kurzweil, inventor of the Kurzweil Reader (and numerous inventions for disabled people), traveled from conference to conference in the 1990s talking about the impact of Moores Law on disability groups, and on the professions that served them. Dr. Kurzweil told his audiences that the doubling power of computers had reached a critical threshold.
Dr. Kurzweil tells the story of the Chinese Emperor who was so pleased with the game of chess that he granted the inventor any wish. The creator of chess asked the Emperor for one humble grain of rice to be placed on the first square of a chess board, two meager grains of rice on the second square, four tiny grains on the third square, eight grains lined up neatly on the next square, and so forth until all 64 squares of the board were accounted for. The Emperor thought the inventor a humble man for asking so little, yet by the 32nd square the Emperor owed the inventor eight billion grains of rice, enough to cover a one acre field. Dramatic things happen on the second half of the chess board, from square 33 to the 64th square (at which point the inventor controls all the rice on the planet).According to Dr. Kurzweil, in 1995, we reached the 32nd doubling of computer power. In the first quarter of 1996 more computers were sold than televisions, and more mail was delivered electronically than through the postal service. You might have heard that this is the information age, and that a technological revolution is going on. What you might not have heard is that the revolution didnt really take off until 1995. Hold onto your hat.
Dramatic changes are underfoot. Computers are getting ready to listen, understand, translate languages in real time, respond instantly with voice, video, animation, graphics, and text. Soon computers will immerse us in virtual worlds so strange and unusual we cannot yet imagine their composition. The reason these changes are no longer science fiction is because we now have (or will soon have) the computing power to make them happen. We crossed the threshold into the future. We are standing on the second half of the chess board. Dr. Kurzweil states that “we will have the technology in a decade to largely overcome the handicaps that are associated with visual, auditory and other disabilities.” In this respect, the impact of technological change on society is a definite positive.
The science of visual pattern recognition only awaits more powerful computers to design machines with vision systems that rival our own. There is a large and energetic field of scientists working in universities and companies all over the globe to make this miracle a reality. Remember that Moores Law has passed the 32nd position of the chess board. Machine vision is not science fiction. It is about to happen. By the year 2010 there will be one billion transistors on a chip. This magnitude of power will make practical machine vision possible shortly after the turn of the century.
Despite all these wondrous changes, the futurists are telling us that we have only begun to paint on the walls of the digital cave. We only need to look out the front door to see that technology has yet to fulfill its imagined destiny. We are racing into a technological future where frightening ethical issues await. At the same time, we are racing backwards into a third world full of poverty and hopelessness. Our obsession with technology must be balanced by an appreciation for the beauty of individual human beings. There is a poetry in everyday life that can be overrun by the frantic pace of our technological world. It is this poetic side of our nature that cares about the poverty, the hopelessness, and the disabilities. Our technological advances are far out racing our poetic determination. My preferred vision of a technological future is much more idealistic than it probably should be.
I would love it if humanity could figure out how to embrace technology for the good that it can do and use it as an enabler to more satisfying leisure time and a more productive work environment. Unfortunately at this juncture in