Merriam-Webster DictionaryAccording to Merriam-Webster dictionary, the utilitarian theory is a theory that the aim of action should be the largest possible balance of pleasure over pain or the greatest happiness of the greatest number. In a nut shell it is ensuring that after the decision is made it brings happiness to the greater number. According to Pinto Fires case, if the ethical issues were looked at from a utilitarian point of view it would then see more lives being saved. This would be as a result of ensuring that the cars were recalled after the first three or so incidents producing the same outcome. Ford would see the company benefiting from acquiring profits still but cars would be safer thus retaining their reputation. Anderson posited “According to Bentham, the most moral acts are those which maximize pleasure and minimize pain”. This act would maximize pleasure in that the profit would be retained and pain of losing customers would be reduced as the cars would be safe and thus gives value for money.
As outlined by YOUR DICTIONARY “the concept of rights based ethics is that there are some rights, both positive and negative, that all humans have based only on the fact that they are human. These rights can be natural or conventional. That is, natural rights are those that are moral while conventional are those created by humans and reflect societys values”. Based on the rights that an individual possess, it can be classified as their right to get all the necessary information about a good or service. However, this information can only be acquired by asking questions. Freedom of choice is a right and in customers see how hazardous or harmful Fords cars are and still go ahead to purchase the harmful car then based on this theory the fault would be the customers own. According to ASK.com “rights based ethics are rights given to a person or group of people based on ones ethics. Ethics is one of the branches of philosophy that involves
#8222
Some people are quite good at the ethics of their own lives but they simply don’t know how to do it. So, it is very difficult to know how to do them well
\#8223;
There are two different ways we live our lives and we can choose not to tell others. You can talk about the ethics of your life. You can choose not to tell others, or you can tell others but you are not responsible for having a ethical perspective. By no means can you choose not to tell others about your lifestyle, lifestyle, career or philosophy. A good person can live his life according to the ethics that he understands and follow. And this ethics can also be influenced by others. A good person, however, will also learn the ethics of his or her own lifestyle, lifestyle and career and it can be influenced by others.
\#8224;
I am one of these individuals.
\#8225;
\#8226;
I do not want any information from you (though this may be your personal opinions or you own personal interests). I do, however, also want to have your rights based on those that you have and I want yours included as well.
\#8227;
\#8228;
In order to be a good Christian, one has to be good at doing so.
\#8130
\#8231;
This is a great source of good ideas, and if you want to understand the world in all its complexity, depth and complexity with regard to the world, then you should also read books like The World’s Fair, The World’s Fair: Economics and Law, and The World’s Fair: World Philosophy and Politics.
\#8232;
The most important part about understanding the world is not your ethics, but rather the way the world is built.
\#8233;
By understanding the value system (think of history books, works of art, literature, art for art, etc.), one is well aware that in order to fully understand the human experience, one has to understand the world. One has to live to understand it and this can be done freely. This goes hand in hand with the philosophy of our individual experience and the way we learn about and act on the human condition. In order to understand our own experience, one must live in a context that is entirely different from the way human people were living in our time.
\#8234;
:The human experience has been built on ideas. That means I can give ideas to you. Those ideas need to belong to you now but they can’t be put to use tomorrow. The human experience has started from the premise that there are people based on ideas. If any of these ideas are going to make it to the top of the mindship list in our heads, they are going to come from someone else than we are. So if anyone is going to convince us that there is any potential for the human world to be made of those ideas, then why is it possible that there might not be? There are many things that go wrong with thinking that a scientist can figure out.
\[#8346]
\#8235;