Conflict ResolutionEssay Preview: Conflict ResolutionReport this essayConflict Resolution in Work TeamsWhen you think of conflict in a work group, do you have the image of a bickering group or of people getting nowhere fast? Are you the type of person that would do almost anything to avoid being disagreeable with others? Maybe you view conflict as a constructive part of problem solving. If you agree with the last statement, then you might be encouraged to know that most experts agree that conflict in a work team can bring great benefits if the conflict is managed correctly. “Leaders who handle problems constructively can improve productivity, generate new ideas and personally develop team members.” (Swales, 2002, para. 2). Conflict can cause a work group to expand their views and find options or solutions that they might otherwise not have discovered. Conflict can be a great motivator to problem solving, but can conflict always bring about positive changes and can the solution please everyone on the team?
Conflict Resolution in Teams*****, a member of the learning team involved with writing this paper, has presented us with a true-life problem in her own work group. ***** has worked for the same employer for 27 years. For those 27 years, her employer has followed tradition and granted vacation time based on seniority. In addition, the company offers employees with seniority a choice of which shifts they want to work. Since ***** has a great deal of seniority within her department, she receives preferential treatment when it comes to vacation approvals and shift requests. The senior employees feel they have earned the right to preferential treatment because of their loyalty to the company. Some newly hired employees with less seniority do not agree with this tradition and argue that there should be a better method, but have not yet suggested one.
In an effort to resolve the conflict between veteran employees and the new hires, management decided to make policy changes. The primary change is to split the department into three separate work groups. Each of the three work groups will act individually in granting vacation requests, even though they will still grant vacation requests using traditional seniority rules. Senior workers dislike the change because they fear the newly hired workers may gain an advantage over veteran employees. Because each group will assign vacation independently of another group, new hires in a veteran-poor group might receive first choice of vacation days, while veteran workers in a veteran-rich group would have to compete to get the remaining vacation days. Newer employees agree with the change because it puts them on a more even footing with the veteran employees.
To complicate matters, management decided to vary the work shift hours, moving away from established work hours. Despite overwhelming support from both senior employees and new hires to retain permanent shift hours based on seniority, management will make the change because it allows them more scheduling flexibility. The employees agree that varied shift hours will complicate pre-existing health problems and/or cause other physical problems, such as sleep disorders and those resulting from stress. “Recent studies suggest that work organization may have a broad influence on worker safety and health and may contribute to occupational injury, work-related musculoskeletal disorders, cardiovascular disease, and other occupational health concerns such as indoor air quality complaints.” (NORA, 1996, Work Environment and Workforce section, para. 21). Even with these objections by both the newer and the more seasoned employees, management seems to be resolute in their decision to make the changes. Does this mean employees who have dedicated years of their working lives to the company will lose the benefits of seniority, or can we find a solution that will benefit both sides? By examining sources of conflict, types of conflict, and more specifically, the types of conflict present in the scenario, we can evaluate a solution that might alleviate some concerns held by all the employees.
Sources of ConflictNo matter how well a group works together, there will always be some conflict in a group. It can arise for any number of reasons. Conflicts may arise between members with different methods of doing things, or can result from the competition for the sharing of resources (Smallwood, n.d.). Some other reasons for conflict can be power struggles, personality clashes, and differing priorities between members of the group (Smallwood, n.d.) All of theses resources are a result of diversity in a work group. Diversity can be an unavoidable cause for conflict involving different viewpoints, backgrounds, and life experiences. These differences result in each person looking at the same set of facts and yet coming to very different conclusions. Since each member has a different set of values and opinions, conflict is certain to arise.
There is no doubt that diversity will bring conflict, but it is important to understand that conflict is not always bad. Depending on how the team handles conflict will determine whether conflict will have a positive influence or a negative influence on the team. Trying to avoid conflict by deliberately avoiding diversity would deny the work team a fair chance to attain success. Jock Noble, CEO of Diversity@work and an expert in workplace diversity, states:
The dominant culture of most organizations is one of assimilation. But individuality is an important source of innovation and can allow a person to contribute more effectively, creatively and productively. Without a recognition of an employees unique qualities, this contribution is often minimised or lost. Employees from diverse backgrounds are happier and more productive if they are appreciated and included, not assimilated or tolerated. (2004)
Conflict is not the problem; rather, it is our reaction to conflict that generates positive or negative feelings (Porter, 2003, p.1).Constructive vs. DestructiveBringing people together who have different viewpoints and who have unique racial, cultural, or educational backgrounds can produce constructive conflict. Constructive conflict occurs when “it leads to better decisions, creativity, and innovative solutions to long-standing problems” (De Janasz et al., 2002). Diverse teams who manage conflict constructively are better problem solvers because they bring a range of ideas and viewpoints to a situation. The team turns the conflict into a positive force and open dialogue becomes possible. Since the group is open to discussion, all members can present their ideas candidly.
Sociality is built by shared values and commonality. The team’s values, values, and shared values also create good teamwork.The members are able to act harmoniously, connect to each other deeply. The members have a sense of common purpose and they care for their fellow team members. It’s important to recognize that differences between people can be easily perceived (e.g., “difference between equals” versus “contagiousness”). When a team members feel that they are no longer welcome or even a part of their team they are considered a threat to their group at large. Diverse teams tend to be more politically and socially divided, which can make it even more difficult to deal with those in large groups and, ultimately, to create good relationships with those in smaller groups.The team members are not limited to a particular race, religious orientation, or ethnic background. There are also differences in the level of social influence of various people and even other people. The team members have to be open about their views and have common sense about them, while also being willing to share them. Different cultures, cultures, cultures and communities all share common beliefs and values, which can make everyone’s personal experience of a problem much more complicated
Many peoples’ social and cultural backgrounds tend to be hard to interpret and understand. They also tend to feel their opinions are not representative of everyone. Therefore, some teams share a certain cultural heritage, such as Greek culture and ancient cultures. A minority of members share a certain historical or cultural origin while at other times it can be considered different from everyone.
Everyone and their fellow team members share common values, such as respect, safety, personal responsibility, and community. When team members feel they are having a difficult time finding a team, they will seek out people with more common values such as personal development, understanding, trustworthiness, respect, and good faith.
To meet the challenges of diversity, you should consider:
1) the variety among members, 2) the level of social and ethical responsibility we should consider within the team, 3) our shared values to be good and appropriate based on the different communities and cultures your team members represent.
2) to share information about the groups across your team and its members through outreach, meetings, blog posts or social media.
3) to meet other people through social media and be a part of discussions or conversations.
4) the team’s beliefs, values and shared goals.
5) the diversity at a diversity conference can be as diverse as the diversity of your team member’s opinions. There are social and cultural differences often associated with the different cultures, cultures and communities you host