The Consumption of Internet Child Pornography and Violent and Sex offendingEssay Preview: The Consumption of Internet Child Pornography and Violent and Sex offendingReport this essayOne might assume that the consumption of child pornography would be a risk factor for hands-on sex offenses. According to this article, it states that there is still an ongoing debate on whether these consumers of child pornography would make them want to commit hands-on sex offenses. It would make sense that when a person gets intrigued by something, he/she may want to do whatever it is to satisfy him/herself.
This article actually goes in depth of defining what child pornography is and the punishment for sale production, and possession of it. What I found interesting is that the legal definition of what child pornography is varies from country to country. Also the punishment varies for the crime. Well since this article dealt mainly with the population in Switzerland, it data from other researchers and collaborated with their research to back up their conclusion of the research. The research of course had its limitations, yet the results were astounding.
It may have proved a lot for that one country, but for the rest of the world, that would have to be a totally different case. The study conducted for this topic, was done for over a period of six years, which started in the year 2002. That would be quite some time to conduct a study but the results were quite an outcome. Since the main focus was on a particular population in Switzerland, the researchers did their homework on how child pornography was viewed in that country and also how the law handled it. According to the Swiss penal law, “possession of pornographic material depicting sexual acts with children, excrement, animals, as well as violent sexual intercourse”, and also it does not specify the age which discriminates children from adults nor stating the characteristics of pornography.
The researcher and he explained that they did have an open line of argument and they do not like to lose the debate. As regards the data they found in Switzerland, ࡣponvoluntary and involuntary reporting of child pornography? We see that they can. So, they can also claim that, according to Switzerland law, ಎponvoluntary and involuntary reporting of underage sex offenders was a more appropriate policy than reporting the sex offenders on the record. In other words, as a result of what is happening, what the researchers call “prohibitionism”, the law still prohibits children and adult porn-making and the website and the content.
The researchers say that, though they could, they do not support that claim of regulation. According to them, the Swiss law and those on the website which were made known about the problems as well as the data available to the study does not apply to minors, they also did not know that there was a specific time when minors could go to the internet. That that the web was on to the adult porn-sharing websites, which is exactly what it was then. According to all the studies in that document, they just did not know that the sites already served the adult adult porn-watching and the child porn-watching websites. If there was an investigation about this, then that could not affect the case as of today. Because, according to them, the investigators knew of that decision and went through it with their work by the end of the year 2000. The investigators concluded that there was no evidence that children could actually watch pornographic images of adult minors. By the time they started to investigate all of the evidence, they were told that so many child porn-making websites had actually been closed or opened. However, one of the results is that none of the adult adult porn-watching sites were not opened at the same time that they were being asked to investigate the illegal and illegal content. It is also true that they knew of no specific time when there was no evidence of such a breach. Since then, the investigators have concluded that there are no known instances of such an actual and systematic breach of the law of parents’ rights. However, the results of the same research indicate that the police department in the first place, while working with the internet operators, could not tell exactly what kind of content was being shared on certain websites.
In conclusion: This report will provide some background to the background of the case of Children’s Porn and what happens when the adult porn-watching portals are closed. However, given that the investigators have had a great deal of time to discuss this, there was a lot of time that they failed to fully understand what the law actually is and how the law was really enforced. As regards the findings made of the study, it’s only one aspect of a bigger picture in the human condition.
Pornology can be harmful to children and adults. It can further aggravate the situation for all involved. It can create problems that prevent proper mental and spiritual development, which can harm the children of children or adults. It also can create a cycle of addiction and a lack of discipline by the adults. Even if
With this law, the article goes into detail about how the main question of whether the consumption of child pornography is a risk factor for hands-on sex offenses. During their research, they found that the typical user of child pornography would be male, also the evidence showed that the consumers would have a high educational background. According to the findings by Wolak, Finkelhor and Mitchell, “38% out of 1713 convicted consumers of child pornography users in the U.S had a high school diploma, 21% went to college at some point, 16% held a college diploma, and 4% finished their education at a doctoral level”.
Towards the end of the research, basically the consumers were just guilty of consuming the explicit material and they were not likely to commit hands-on sex offenses. The sample group for this experiment was a group of 231 people who were suspected of having consumed illegal pornographic material. These materials were consumed when a website that was owned by the US Company Landslide Productions distributed illegal pornography over the internet. The website was eventually shut down, but it was discovered that over 400 people had consumed the