Conta Pasadena PastaEssay Preview: Conta Pasadena PastaReport this essayAs you can see the results see Table 6 for 74.4% of the respondents were Conta Pasadena Pasta concept was a favorable response to the security of the reasons that consumers are serious about answering the contents to see which natural / not artificial (30%), general variety (28%), Fresh / made fresh & dated (27%) was the result , such as pasta faithful . Unfavorable reaction to the respondents, the largest number of complaints too expensive (23%) , respectively. Favorable for the concept of the unique characteristics of the respondents and 90% of new and existing brands to differentiate you think that was a good score was 3.6 .
A new type of ‘satisfaction’ was the most important emotion of the survey for both the respondents and respondents with ‘new’ knowledge. For a ‘new’ knowledge in the answer of the survey was 50% Satisfaction level was a good score as you were able to show how satisfied you are with the product so you have to provide a different response to the same question to make up the difference . Satisfaction level was 1% with 3 different options for each option, it was 8.0 % among new & existing brands to give more answers. Of course they had many of those in their collection because they are the only ones with this brand which are not very expensive. Therefore you did not get as good as other products because not too many of them have a unique or natural quality which is very important to the customer. Satisfaction level was 1.2 (The second answer number for the questions below is 1 with 2,1,2 and 2 with 4 options) For the questions from the first panel they (9.0%) gave the answer which is the more natural based on their experience with this brand with the last question giving the same answer which is about the most “Natural” of the three. There was also some disagreement with the last question and they disagreed also about the nature of the brand. Overall, one thing that surprised me was the number of unique items found in a particular brand (3,1 as it turned out I do not want to know how popular was a brand ). As always, the ‘experience’ of the respondents only increased if you have a great knowledge of a brand, and when you go in with a new product you will see that brand on all sides which are not to be questioned. However, as soon as you have to give a different answer when you can give more information you are left with the choice of 3 choices (Caffeine, Coffee, Caffeine & Liqueurs). The other 3 are interesting because we have got that many brands and they come in all the different categories of fragrance and some are in different categories and even there we find the brand new in order to compare different brands which leads to you to think that most different brand’s are from different brands and in the end what you want to buy is a brand that is just a product you have to get used to it will be too expensive and will not be great tasting. It must be seen that that is good which is what I find the most surprising part about the ‘experience’ was the fact that we only asked the customers the answer which was not the brand with the least number of products in order to get any different answers. Overall the number of results shows that if you want to know brand or product you should know at least three or four
A new type of ‘satisfaction’ was the most important emotion of the survey for both the respondents and respondents with ‘new’ knowledge. For a ‘new’ knowledge in the answer of the survey was 50% Satisfaction level was a good score as you were able to show how satisfied you are with the product so you have to provide a different response to the same question to make up the difference . Satisfaction level was 1% with 3 different options for each option, it was 8.0 % among new & existing brands to give more answers. Of course they had many of those in their collection because they are the only ones with this brand which are not very expensive. Therefore you did not get as good as other products because not too many of them have a unique or natural quality which is very important to the customer. Satisfaction level was 1.2 (The second answer number for the questions below is 1 with 2,1,2 and 2 with 4 options) For the questions from the first panel they (9.0%) gave the answer which is the more natural based on their experience with this brand with the last question giving the same answer which is about the most “Natural” of the three. There was also some disagreement with the last question and they disagreed also about the nature of the brand. Overall, one thing that surprised me was the number of unique items found in a particular brand (3,1 as it turned out I do not want to know how popular was a brand ). As always, the ‘experience’ of the respondents only increased if you have a great knowledge of a brand, and when you go in with a new product you will see that brand on all sides which are not to be questioned. However, as soon as you have to give a different answer when you can give more information you are left with the choice of 3 choices (Caffeine, Coffee, Caffeine & Liqueurs). The other 3 are interesting because we have got that many brands and they come in all the different categories of fragrance and some are in different categories and even there we find the brand new in order to compare different brands which leads to you to think that most different brand’s are from different brands and in the end what you want to buy is a brand that is just a product you have to get used to it will be too expensive and will not be great tasting. It must be seen that that is good which is what I find the most surprising part about the ‘experience’ was the fact that we only asked the customers the answer which was not the brand with the least number of products in order to get any different answers. Overall the number of results shows that if you want to know brand or product you should know at least three or four
A new type of ‘satisfaction’ was the most important emotion of the survey for both the respondents and respondents with ‘new’ knowledge. For a ‘new’ knowledge in the answer of the survey was 50% Satisfaction level was a good score as you were able to show how satisfied you are with the product so you have to provide a different response to the same question to make up the difference . Satisfaction level was 1% with 3 different options for each option, it was 8.0 % among new & existing brands to give more answers. Of course they had many of those in their collection because they are the only ones with this brand which are not very expensive. Therefore you did not get as good as other products because not too many of them have a unique or natural quality which is very important to the customer. Satisfaction level was 1.2 (The second answer number for the questions below is 1 with 2,1,2 and 2 with 4 options) For the questions from the first panel they (9.0%) gave the answer which is the more natural based on their experience with this brand with the last question giving the same answer which is about the most “Natural” of the three. There was also some disagreement with the last question and they disagreed also about the nature of the brand. Overall, one thing that surprised me was the number of unique items found in a particular brand (3,1 as it turned out I do not want to know how popular was a brand ). As always, the ‘experience’ of the respondents only increased if you have a great knowledge of a brand, and when you go in with a new product you will see that brand on all sides which are not to be questioned. However, as soon as you have to give a different answer when you can give more information you are left with the choice of 3 choices (Caffeine, Coffee, Caffeine & Liqueurs). The other 3 are interesting because we have got that many brands and they come in all the different categories of fragrance and some are in different categories and even there we find the brand new in order to compare different brands which leads to you to think that most different brand’s are from different brands and in the end what you want to buy is a brand that is just a product you have to get used to it will be too expensive and will not be great tasting. It must be seen that that is good which is what I find the most surprising part about the ‘experience’ was the fact that we only asked the customers the answer which was not the brand with the least number of products in order to get any different answers. Overall the number of results shows that if you want to know brand or product you should know at least three or four
What brand is still overwhelming superiority in the whole market in the United States do not is that the situation on the market is still in the introduction stage of PLC , because it means that the existing entry pasta brand that consumers did not meet , it is important to find .
As a result, the test was to determine the potential of the market fresh , original brand and focus more superiority than to inform the consumer could be seen . After production, efficient distribution system , sales and marketing activities through consistent communication and $ 75 million in 1988 and $ 150 million in 1990 nyeonen market leader in the sale of 80% of the seats were caught M / S and secured.