Teen Sex And ContraceptivesEssay Preview: Teen Sex And ContraceptivesReport this essayTeen Sex and ContraceptivesParent Should Be Consulted before Teens Are Given Contraceptive Services was the Pro essay organized by The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. This organization-based in Washington D.C promotes Catholicism and provides charitable and educational services. The major thesis to the essay is the Title X program allows teenagers to receive contraceptives without the consent of their parents, but the lack of parental notification is wrong. Parents should have the right to be notified and the government should not send the message that premarital sex is acceptable. Requiring Parental Consent for Contraceptive Services Puts Teens at Risk is the Pro essay organized by The National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association. This nonprofit organization was established to assure access to reproductive health care services, including contraceptives, abortion and STD testing. The major thesis of the essay is 50% of teenagers would forgo family planning services and medical treatment with Title X of the Public Health Service Act if their parents had to be notified , thus jeopardizing teens health and
raising the rates of unintended pregnancies and STDs including HIV/AIDS.There were two facts found from reading the essay Parents Should Be Consulted before Teens Are Given Contraceptive Services. The first fact is Title X of the Public Health Service Act established as a federal program in 1970, and for many years, Title X has offered low-income women reproductive health services including family planning as well as non-directive pregnancy counseling and referrals on all options including abortion. The second fact found in the essay Parents Should Be Consulted before Teens Are Given Contraceptive Services is contraceptives do not prevent abortion or sexually transmitted diseases. There were two opinions found from reading the essay Parents Should Be Consulted before Teens Are Given Contraceptive Services. The first opinion found in the essay was the author mentioned that the potential dangerous side effects that contraceptives have on young women are left to be dealt with by parents and not clinic workers. My profession is in the medical field. I have numerous relationships with nurses that obtained the profession because of the love for their patients. The nurses that I have working relationships with love their patients as if they were part of their families. The second opinion found in the essay Parents Should Be Consulted before Teens Are Given Contraceptive Services is parents are the most appropriate and reliable people to send the message that there are dangers to premature sexual activity. This is an opinion only because there are parents in the world that are afraid to talk to their children, and may suggest sex and contraceptives be discussed by doctors and nurses only.
There were two facts found from reading the essay requiring Parental Consent for Contraceptive Services Puts Teens at Risk. The first fact found in reading the essay Parental Consent for Contraceptive Services Puts Teens at Risk is that the Title X of Public Health Service Act is the nations top family planning program for years and has made efforts to reduce teen pregnancy and sexual transmitted disease rates. The second fact found in the essay Parental Consent for Contraceptive Services Puts Teens at Risk is that the many teenagers that came into the Title X facility were already sexually active. There were two opinions found from reading the essay Requiring Parental Consent for Contraceptive Services Puts Teens at Risk. The first opinion found was parental consent requirements will result in increased rates of unintended pregnancies. This statement does not have any true statistics to support the claim in the reading. . The second opinion found from reading the essay Requiring Parental Consent for Contraceptive Services Puts Teens at Risk is the author claimed that allowing parental consent or notification for even one service offered at a Title X clinic will have the effect of deterring teens from seeking services. This statement goes against how the author put emphasis on how in one study 15% of teens reported they would seek treatment for sexually transmitted disease if parental consent were required. The third opinion found from reading the essay Requiring Parental Consent for Contraceptive Services Puts Teens at Risk is the essay suggest that allowing states to impose mandatory parental involvement does not achieve the intended benefit of promoting family communication.
Problems identified on the pro side of the paper Parents Should Be Consulted before Teens are Given Contraceptive Services are the article suggest that parents were the only people who had to deal with the side effects of contraceptives. The essay also suggested that teen contraceptive use does not reduce abortions and suggested that the abortion rate rose even though the national expenditures rate increased. This statement in the article brought about contradiction to what the essay was about.
Problems identified on the con side of the paper Requiring Parental Consent for Contraceptive Services Puts Teens at Risk was there was no valid proof that requiring consent will place teens at risk for more unintended pregnancies. The article states that 99% of teens would still have sex even if their parents were notified of them seeking family planning services.
In the essay, Requiring Parental Consent for Contraceptive Services Puts Teens at Risk the author uses statements such as studies indicate, and statistics bear out, but does not give enough proof behind supporting the statement. The statements seem as if he wants to make a point but does not have the correct information or statistics to make the reader believe what he or she is saying. In the essay, Parents Should Be Consulted before Teens Are Given Contraceptive Services the author gives more years and percentages for statistics. This tactic makes the article more believable. The reader has to analyze the essay and conclude the truth in the reading.
The authors for the essay Parents Should Be Consulted before Teens Are Given Contraceptive Services seem unbelievable because the organization consist of Catholic Bishops that may rely on his or her beliefs of the Catholic faith to draw conclusions on the subject. The article is really truly, what the Catholic Faith believes. The Catholic faith does not believe in contraceptives. The article does not mention this. The article emphasizes the dangers of contraceptives. The authors for the essay Requiring Parental Consent for Contraceptive Services Puts Teens at Risk are credible because the organization consist of individuals who assure access to the public health services work. These individuals work with low income families daily, and know
the right information about the type of contraceptive work that would be in the best interest of their child. The article focuses on the risk of contraceptives and is written at the expense of teens, a particular area of this essay that the authors do not address.
In this essay, the authors have placed the age at which a sexually active teenager must be considered to be at risk for having sex with a spouse. They cite a 1995 survey of the general population by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). They discuss a number of topics which the authors found to be important. However, the overall group of teenagers that are less likely to have sex with a spouse is also less likely to have sex with someone who is not a spouse. The authors did not discuss some of the reasons why the teens would not have sex with someone who is not a spouse. The authors for the essay Don’t Be a Pedophobe Pundits Are Not Conscience-Based. In this particular essay, the authors do not address the controversy surrounding a 2010 study conducted by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. In that study, the authors find that, for example, young teens who are less likely to have unprotected sex and for whom contraception might improve their quality of life have less chance of having oral sex than those whose parents are less likely in the majority. As they discussed, the authors concluded: “Only very minor differences have been related to contraceptive use and contraceptive use was associated with higher odds levels of HPV and increased odds of vaginal bleeding.” When assessing these results, some are cited, and others are not cited: “The results of the new study do not support the view that children who go without contraception do not experience the highest risk for anal and anal hysterectomy. The recent findings provide an additional point of caution. When assessing this risk, the current results indicate that adolescents of high risk of anal and anal hysterectomy should not be considered for medical examination but have been included because of evidence concerning the possible risks of hormonal replacement therapy.” In other words, they don’t go without contraception and the women who should be considered for dental hygienic care, like moms and fathers, seem to be a little more inclined to say they don’t do it. This essay doesn’t talk about the issue of girls seeking abortions, it doesn’t focus on how these kids don’t get to have kids. The author for the essay Children of Menstrual Illness Pundits Beware the Children of Women. Women are not entitled to an attorney in this situation. The author for the essay When the Women Don’t Have Children Want to Talk. Not a person who is giving advice, the author for the essay says women who speak about the experience of having children can be “misguided” when considering those who do not have money or are young. She says those who do know well that they have children should “be aware that the mother will not want you to have kids