Essay About Contrary De May’S Essay And Legal Responsibility

37 Who Saw the Murder and Didnt Call the Police
37 Who Saw the Murder and Didnt Call the Police
The murder of Cartherine Genovese was an event that headlined news stories across
the country, however it wasn’t the murder itself that shocked people. According to
Gansberg’s essay “37 Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police” the shock was that
thirty seven people witnessed the murder but no one called the police. Since then this
case has been used as an example of human fear in criminal and psychology classes.
However there have been more accounts which tell a different story of the incident.De
May’s essay says although thirty seven people heard something they didn’t know what
was actually going on which is why nobody called the police.
“37 Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police” is the story of the brutal killing of
Catherine Genovese ,a young women living alone in the quiet upper middle class
neighborhood of Kew Gardens, in Queens, New York.What we learn from the story is
that her cries for help in the middle of the night led thirty seven people to watch her being
fatally stabbed and the reaction of them was to treat her ongoing murder as a bad
television show that could safely be turned off.The crime was doubly terrifying because
witnesses to the crime might very well have saved her life if only they had the courage
and the compassion to get involved.Assistant Chief Inspector Frederick M.Lussen,from
the story, said”As we have reconstructed the crime the assailant had three chances to kill
this woman during a 35-minute period.He returned twice to complete the job.If we had
been called after the first attacked,the woman might not be dead now”.The witness who
called police,explained that he had called the police after much deliberation,he called first
friend for advice and then went to the apartment of the elderly woman to get her to make
the call.”I didn’t want to get involved”was his exuse.Another witness said”There is no
legal responsibility for any citizen to report a crime”.One couple explained that they saw
everything very well but asked why they hadn’t called the police they replied”We don’t
know”.And one witness said”I was tired, I went back to bed”.This is why Gansberg’s
essay became a national news story of human fear.
On the contrary De May’s essay is telling us that Gansberg’s story is mostly wrong.
According to De May’s story not all of 37 witnesses were eye witnesses. He explains
that whatever the precise number, merely being “witnesses” does not necessarily mean
that the 37 saw, heard or understood what was happening. For example, if a man were
only half awakened by Kittys screams and then immediately drifted back off to sleep not
to remember that