Sacred Scripture and Cosmogony of Islam and ChristianityJoin now to read essay Sacred Scripture and Cosmogony of Islam and ChristianityNearly every religion and culture around the world has transcribed sacred scriptures or depictions of how the universe and mankind came to exist. As many well know, Christianity (Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant and Evangical Denominations) and Islam are certainly no different in those aspects; however, what many individuals do not know is that Christianity and Islam have quite a few similarities concerning the creation of the universe and mankind. Although each religion has their own extravagant and unique beliefs they share significant beliefs within their sacred scriptures. I believe it’s important to understand the views and beliefs concerning these two religions, mainly because Christianity and Islam are the two largest religions in the world, with approximately 1.9 billion people being Christian and 1.1 billion people being Muslim. Although Christianity is the largest religion in the world, Islam is the fastest growing and unfortunately extremist on both sides are imposing their spiritual ideologies on one another. People in the future will have to learn to not have the typical stereotype of a Muslim or that of a Christian. Leaps and gains in a peaceful global society will be based on each of us respecting and perhaps even knowing each others religious or spiritual beliefs.
Historically, the roots of Islam and Christianity grow from similar philosophical, theological, cultural, and geographical underpinnings. Both Christianity and Islamic sacred scriptures (Holy Bible and Quran or Alcoran) note that creation of mankind and the origin of the universe was the action of one God. Whatever Christianity and Islamic faith differences are, these two major world religions have sacred documents that in essence recapitulate on a number of different subjects. However, Islam and Christianity are always used to describe very diverse groups of people and certainly very diverse theologies.
Of course there are many different spiritual groups within each religion; sadly however there are some spiritual groups that often disagree on fundamental issues especially when one . The debates within Christianity and Islam can be heated, often hostile. By extension, the debates between the two religions often erupt into full-blown bloody battles.
hope to better understand a religion other than my own, I observed much in common between Christianity and Islam. My research points to important historical, theological, philosophical, metaphysical, and cultural similarities. Attending the services of both traditions, I realized too that the ritualistic clothing each religion wears cloaks these fundamental facts in common. However, this is not to detract from the very real differences that exist between Christianity and Islam. On these very same issues: theology, philosophy, and culture, the two religions often appear to be from two different worlds. Unfortunately, it is mostly the differences between Christianity and Islam that preoccupy people, rather than what these two magnificent traditions have in common.
Since I was raised in a religious household but also with a liberal Christian mindset my upbringing differs from many other people who consider themselves to be Christian. Furthermore, my belief system probably differs greatly from other people who consider themselves also to be liberal Christians as well. Like most people, I inherited my religious beliefs from my parents. Their direct and unspoken teachings helped me to formulate my own beliefs as well as my biases. Luckily, though, my parents were not overtly prejudiced against other religious groups and I therefore hold few strongly held biases. Nevertheless, I was taught that the Christian faith was fundamentally a good one and could very well be the best one. This belief in the supremacy of Christianity remains with me now on a subconscious level, even though I consciously deny it.
Contrary to conservative or fundamentalist sects of Christianity, liberal Christians do not take the Bible literally. Jesus is viewed as the ultimate role model. The miracles he worked may or may not have actually occurred; the fact that they appear in the Bible does not necessarily make them historical fact but rather these teachings have allegorical value. Furthermore, God is not personified. Although usually referred to as “He,” God is a genderless power. Herein rests one of the fundamental and most significant similarities between Liberal Christianity and Islam: the nature of God. To the Muslim worshipper, Allah is an omniscient spiritual power that has no human form. Islam is actually even stricter than Christianity in this regard, forbidding any and all religious iconography. Mosques are noticeably devoid of any human portraits or statues, unlike most Christian churches which are replete with a depiction of Jesus somewhere. In Islam, there is no “Son of God,”
But unlike the West in any other direction, Islam and liberalism are not just political opposites who see Jesus as an omniscient and omnipresent power. Both sides see him as the great moral authority who has the moral and ethical responsibility to protect humanity from other peoples’ infidels . To the liberal, he claims that the Islamic authorities and their religious leaders are the greatest enemies of humanity. They demand strict obedience to Jesus, the rule of law, and even his right to freedom of conscience, although many Muslim thinkers are willing to accept such demands. Some secular liberals also argue in favour of greater equality between God the Father and those who give Him spiritual guidance. There are some exceptions to this, where such equality is sought in matters that involve an unbridled, unregulated, and illegal religion, such as non-violent crime—an element that is especially often mentioned. But that may sometimes be a matter for political parties (and, to a lesser extent, civil unrest)—in other words, for the government itself and, more generally, for citizens. It may be that, as far as Islam is concerned, Muslim politicians and government officials must also be accountable for their actions, and, indeed, the rest of the world can see through those eyes.
In fact Islam itself does not contain any form of such accountability, while liberalism is indeed just as open to such reforms as liberalism has, and even more so. In general, liberals are also more open to changes to Islamism that are less ideologically driven than the current state of affairs. This is partly due to its lack of a political agenda, the extent to which Muslims are willing to engage in the fight against Islamism, because it has provided real freedom to do so in the face of many oppressive regimes. The key difference is that all Islamists are very conservative and will even go so far as to demand that Muslims must accept radical views and violence that are antithetical to their religion (such as the one in Mecca). This is because many Muslim clerics and religious institutions are also, as is clear enough, committed to a radical vision of Islam and are actively trying to impose it upon others when dealing with sensitive societies. It is this kind of radicalism that is not usually mentioned in the political establishment because in fact, Islam does not contain any such radicalism. On the contrary, Islam is actually quite different from many other religions in that it eschews or rejects certain practices that are seen as extremist. In other words, it isn’t often that a Muslim in Islam commits a serious terrorist act. Although a significant number of Islamist extremists are not Islamists, as some have pointed out, Islam in fact holds the fundamental right for its political leadership to impose its views on others. In essence, these radical Islamists are not only Islamists, but Islamic reformers as well.
Liberal Islamism
Liberal Islamism has its roots in the history of Islam itself. The Islamic State (ISIS) was founded in 2009 by the extremist group Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS). In the years since that time, ISIS has managed to retain its hold in Iraq and Syria. Both ISIS and the other major Sunni jihadists operating in Iraq now comprise significant parts of a network of militants in Iraq. The current leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is the leader of ISIS, the group he controls. Since late 2009, ISIS has had considerable influence over the governance of Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq. The group itself is a network that shares many elements with other groups on the ground, yet it is, at the same time, more radical in its approach. Even before the formation of ISIS, the group had largely relied on violent means and resources to survive in Iraq, while its main competitor Hezbollah later withdrew. These forces, in turn, had little involvement abroad in the Middle East and Syria. By the time the organization had gained an influence in the