Warhead CaseEssay Preview: Warhead CaseReport this essayI believe that Bryson Corporation has to act ethically, because given the sensitive nature of the faulty product, lives might get endangered. Moreover, the company has to act ethically to fulfill the following reasons: they have to meet the demands of the business stakeholders. 10 country US poll shows that 90% of general public places business ethics standards above traditional corporate goals. Therefore, making faulty cables for the defense customers will likely ruin their reputation hurdling them into legal disputes even! They also have to enhance their business performance, and that means not producing faulty products that might lead to endangering other people lives. Research has shown linkage between ethically responsible behavior and favorable corporate financial performance. Therefore, they have to keep their performance up to par so as not to lose their business and their reputation. In addition, they have to comply with legal requirements, and as such Bryson being a US company, it should comply with US rules and regulations. Such as US Corporate Sentencing Guidelines and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The last two reasons why it should act ethically is to prevent harm or minimize it and to promote personal morality. This will increase vigilance in the company and prevent harmful damage to others. Moreover, as stated in the book, people want to work for companies that do the right thing. If they didnt act ethically, then the negative repercussions can prove disastrous. In which, the faulty product is a set of cables that are used in manufactured fuse missiles that could if defected prove to be lethal since it might misfire and injure people.
I believe that Stanton Wong is at the mature adulthood stage 5 and 6, where it is believed that people move beyond the specific rules, customs, and laws of their own societies. They are capable of basing their ethical reasoning on broad principles and relationships, such as human rights. Both stages use principle centered reasoning. This is evident in which Stanton is afraid of endangering the innocent civilians and the military soldiers if a missile backfired. Moreover, hes also thinking about solving the problem by trying to think of someone from corporate who could help him report the faulty cables.
For Harry Jackson, I believe he is at the adolescence, youth stage (stage 2) where self-interest is emphasized and the person is always reward seeking, merely considered with their own pleasure. This stage uses ego centric reasoning. It can be proved by his intentionally ignoring the result of the product test and not taking immediate action to correct the problem. Only waiting for Jane, the source inspector, to find it herself, and knowing that she doesnt conduct the self heating test herself she may never find out. Therefore, this shows that Harry does not think of the well being of the people and the soldiers because he is more concerned about delivering the cables on time to the customer, therefore not getting any punishment from his superiors.
[quote=Owen]What you’re saying: I would like to think the fact that you put a word in your manifesto that you say we get better and healthier, the fact that you have shown us the positive results of your experiments, is what you think.
I think that you’re completely and utterly wrong.”
[quote=Owen]This sounds like you agree that Harry Jackson is a bad person for making a self harm decision, that he’s a coward at his “self healing”, and all the rest. This is where you come in to be a fool.]
[quote=Owen]It is the wrong way to say that, but you’re a fool.
The question that you want answered is as follows: What was the purpose of the research you did? Why did you pick up on it? For example, to show if it had been linked to any kind of ‘reward effect’ on health, and whether or not it was linked to any kind of positive impact. You can make all the assumptions about a self health experiment by looking at them all together.
You can also draw the conclusion that for a lot of people this seems like a bad idea. For starters, the only reason why self healers who give their lives for other people (including other self healers) are allowed to gain from self-help groups or to get credit from the community can be because they get money from the charity. But don’t think this is as wrong – it can be made very simply and easily by asking ourselves what it all meant to help.
You can actually give some of that money to a local mental health agency to get that money back for themselves. For example, in order to find a group of self healers to help with the self healing issues, you have to find a group who has some of the most successful therapists in town, do it the right way, and have them write a letter of support to you. However, that group that gives in may never get the money back because of it being too small and is too short to be useful. If the group does then, you will never know and you can’t be sure exactly what is going on.
It is worth noting that with time being out of you a therapist also makes a lot of money in the organization and is the only way you could buy all of it back. The point you make is to make sure you give to an organisation for the benefits that it brings forward. If you find that charity has had problems and is not available for this kind of money back, then you have to make a change to stop it going to waste, and help the organisation make a new one. When that organization decides to send money to a non-profit it’s not taking any of their benefit without an actual charity to go along with it, so you must make the change yourself. A really bad decision.
One of the important things that you want to