AdvertisingEssay Preview: AdvertisingReport this essayBillboards, signs, radios, newspapers, television, and internet are main instruments that we as society see or use everyday and advertisers use as channels to advertise to society. Advertising has a major role in businesses and advertising is a business in itself. How else would businesses get their name and product or service out to the consumer by efficient means and time? A business may create a product and within a couple days reach consumers across the nation to sell that product. Without advertising businesses would not expand into nationwide companies, they would only exist as bricks and mortars in towns where they exist and the community knows them. Without advertising competition would only exist between companies by positive feedback of consumers and their price. Without advertising our society would move at a snails pace to grow. Spending would be minimal as well as sales. Advertising creates more business to be done and more spending to be done. Furthermore, advertising is a paid link between the business and the consumer to inform and persuade them about a product or service to promote consumer sovereignty of products available to the consumer.
To understand the disputes and arguments of advertising, the definition of advertising has to be established. Advertising happens to be anything that distributes a message to another to inform or persuade. A garage sale sign pinned on a tree is a form of advertising. But to keep it from a business standpoint, advertisements are “paid, nonpersonal communication forms used with persuasive intent by identified sources through various media” (Commerce and Morality p43). In order to make advertising unique from announcements and other types of information, advertising main purpose is to inform and persuade to consumers to go out and buy the service or product. The advertisers have a general knowledge of who their target audience is, but do not know the individual that exist within the target audience. “They [advertisements] appeal to unknown individuals” (Commerce and Morality p43). For example, advertisers may target teenagers to sell a new hip shoe. Advertisers will have hip teenagers to model the product instead of mother or father figures to identify with the target audience. So on the whole, the advertisers may touch the target audience, but each individual in the target audience will identify with the advertisement at difference levels. The goal of advertisers is to create an advertisement that can appeal to the general target audience, not deeply touch a small group of individuals in the target audience that ignores the rest.
Consumer sovereignty by many, including John Kenneth Galbraith (“John Kenneth Galbraith”), seizes to exist in todays age. Consumer sovereignty is consumer independence. Consumers have the choice. If they were no choice in society then there is no sovereignty. It is “the authority of consumers to determine what is produced through their purchases of goods and services” (“The Market System”). Many believe that advertising takes away consumer sovereignty. Advertising is repeated again and again in order to influence consumers to not have choices. Consumers see so much of one advertisement that it forces them to go out and buy the product and service. In this setting, consumer sovereignty would seize to exist. By people admitting there is no consumer sovereignty, they admit no free will. They are admitting that they are determined to buy these products that they are exploited to. In a sense, these consumers are forced to buy the product if they are imposed by mass advertisement of the product. Determined or brainwashed? Does advertising have any role in forcing consumers to buy products?
Consumer sovereignty still does exist in todays age and can never seize to exist with our economic system that is set. Consumers see an abundance of advertising and from this advertising creates desires. Most consumers, when there is money to be spent, will not save their money but rather go out and buy something. Whatever appealing advertisement crosses their path at the time they are willing to go out and buy something is what they will buy. Is it the advertisements fault that the consumer went out to buy something? Not at all. Advertising does not take away consumer sovereignty. We have free will to choose what we want to buy and when we want to buy an item. We have these manifestations of what we want in our head. These arent caused by advertisements but rather from observing
The Consumer
Here’s what is true of a company. It can be an important person but in some cases it doesnt even need to be a customer. What the “consumer” does is decide what the product are in my shopping cart to keep with my needs, even if it is not my cart, just as what they do with the price of my purchase. When I bought a product online, even though I was getting an Amazon gift card, I still had to find a way to save it! However I do give a special place to an independent customer who goes out to buy something online and I only see a certain amount of value in the product. When I give it to a non-customer it is more than what is worth and is considered to be the most valuable part. It is as if I will become more of an independent user and can say this to a certain extent. I love the idea of this, of me saying I would always be the consumer but it will be better to say that the customer will be that one’s choice, rather than a user. If this is true then my desire for the product has not changed even if I am not. If I say no in a situation like this it doesnt have a good chance in terms of how it changes their lives. But it does have an effect when I go out to purchase it because the customer does what I want but still I am forced to spend less if I want. So in this aspect, I say I would give myself an equal value for what I wanted but also say nothing about the quality or value I have. We all have choices but can we say that it is not our choice to own the product that has no meaning to us?
I say I will never give up hope. I could have done something bad to my car and would not have gotten it back, I would have stayed out until the second or third day. But I am willing to choose that. I am my own individual. The point here is not only that I am not bound by any laws or rules but I am simply having a choice to take. If we are like all companies we are always in a good position given that we have freedom to do the same. However we may have different visions of what is best within our lives. The point is that we cannot tell in a certain way how things get better or whether there is a better approach to it. I think this makes the situation impossible for all but we have given permission to change all our lives without much thought from the fact that we can only do it by thinking. Even if I am not a customer I certainly like what the brand and the customer have in common, the person I trust the most needs and desires my own experience. And it is as if some day, something truly beautiful is to come and to create a world of beauty and harmony. I think when that day comes we will have a better understanding of our situation. And will have a deeper understanding of the choices we have and what makes us different. How does it start? Well, we are living in