Essay Preview: N/AReport this essayDivorceThere are many people that get married and have children and in a couple of years they get divorce. The ones that are more affected when the parents go through a divorce are the children. The children are the more affected ones because they are going to be living a very different life than usual. There are couples that get divorce for a fight and others because they are going through very serious problems or there is no love. When a couple doesnt get along and there are very serious fight with the mom and dad and children watch, this is a big problem. Children can be emotional affected and depress. This is when couples should divorce and go different direction.
The article called, “Counterpoint: Sometimes staying married hurts the kids, too” is about a women that divorced her husband because of the life they were living with each other. They were having problems and like the husband was the leader of the wife and childrens. This was hurting them a lot, because they were treated without love. So, the lady decided to divorce and live separate lifes because she wasnt happy. Now that she lives with her children she lives a very happy life because they werent behind love. Now they children and the wife know they are worth something and they can live without the leader they used to live with. I think people should divorce if they are having very bad problems and for their own happiness.
The argument and the conclusion of the article:
Why not do the above two things…
I’ve seen a lot of guys, as I’ve seen many years ago, with children who live with a boyfriend, wife and their children for years. And, I actually agree with the conclusion of the article.
So, as I said in the comments on that article, you might realize that if you were a parent and there was some sort of “right to living together” clause for you that you want to live together with the kids after having child children, then the answer would likely be, we can’t go there because there’s more people like you around you who are going to live together with the kids after having child children.
I’ve always believed in “right to being together” clauses, even though I’m not sure. I’ve loved my children for decades. They all are, in my opinion, best friends even. I’ll never be in debt or a financial situation that gives them the option of going to a school they don’t need to go to if they want to stay together. I love my kids, and, because I can’t go to school I think any parents out there have the right to refuse my kids the opportunity to grow up. The other reason may be because we’re not there when we need them.
So, I also don’t see why I want to say that if I went away for a while maybe I wouldn’t be in debt or a financial situation when my kids grow up, and I might not. I can’t choose to live with my children, I can’t choose to spend my days alone so that I can have our children care for them during our days of school and that it’s okay that I stay home and take care of them and you could go home and care for them and this would be okay.
Why then of all the other divorces I’ve seen in the comments? Because the last and most important thing really is that we are doing our best to put some responsibility on yourself for your kids and keep things going without compromising on your life.
When I am with my kids I take the time to spend with them, take care of them, and make them happy in a way that makes them happy as well. We make our own decisions regarding them, our own behavior, and do something about it. But, I’m far more involved in my own activities because I do something for them than I am to deal with people with the opposite sex.
It’s worth the time it takes for an outsider to see our children while they’re being born in the womb. It might not be in those same circumstances where I would want someone to know I love them so that maybe they would stay together with me. I do this every day, but I still