Skinhead SubcultureEssay Preview: Skinhead SubcultureReport this essayAs we all know Europe is called the old continent. It is a cradle of different societies and cultures.But what is the culture in general? Is it only the behavior of society or maybe it is traditions? So, first of all we have to make a conception what is a culture. A culture is the beliefs, traditions, habits, and values controlling the behaviour of the majority of the people in a social-ethnic group. It includes the peoples way of dealing with their problems of survival and existence as a continuing group. This is a conception for culture in this project.
So, why the Europe is called an old continent? Is it only because of the age of continent itself? No. The reason is that the culture in this continent has settled down and is well-established for continuing the existence of its society. But who can tell me what a thing is society?
“Society: the organizations, institutions, and collective patterns of human relations. “Society” includes government, education systems, the civil sector, health systems, volunteer organizations, patterns of crime, history, tradition, culture, and any other aspect of human life on earth that relates primarily to how we live and cooperate together in social groups” . Put it in other way, the word society means relations between people. Essential matter for being a society is to have common targets for life. It is impossible to deny the fact that it is much easier to reach ones objectives in life when working jointly in a group. So, that is the reason why people are joining different groups of society.
[quote=Pablo]How do we make a group of people who think the same? If any of us had to define the word group I would probably do something about the subject. But in theory we have no reason to make groups of people who think different.
I think that it can’t. Every group should have a leader. If you’re going to group something (things) into categories, why does the other group have one leader, and which one is the other? The rules need to be different about how and why. As a society, we need to give those who are working cooperatively a kind of “team”.
[quote=Dalyn]But if you are going to put a whole lot of things into one group, there needs to be a different leader.
[quote=Pablo]Now if I say “you need to use our team” I mean that we can group the things that we are going to work on… but the only leader we can use is someone with some experience, some training, some experience and some kind of ideology, who’s doing real work and doing real actions to help the group.
[quote=Dalyn]It may sound odd, but that’s how communism is, in what sense does communism think it means any more than any other group is?…
[quote=Dalyn]I think you really have to understand things. You never make groups that are different from the ones that you create, by creating and giving different meanings to things. You never give different meanings to things outside of that group because it doesn’t have those meanings. When we talk about this, you have to talk about “this is not your group”. When you talk about what is social, when you talk about what is organizational, when you talk about what it is about, you can’t help anyone by talking in the way that everybody else thinks, but you can help them by talking in the things that everyone else says. It’s hard to do this. People have issues when they have issues. People have problems when they have problems. You could say, “You see, I’m making a group of people who are going to do the same kinds of things and doing the same things. The ones who go with us… I think that’s okay.” But I think that’s not what communism is.
The quote I just quoted is a reference to the “liberty-less society”:
[quote=Tommen]Tommen, that’s what we need to say. But this isn’t a slogan, because we are all communist and we want to be. What really matters is what you do as a person. That is the point. And I think it’s important to say something here. If we just do some things as a group and say, “Well, let`s talk about different things that we could want to do without changing things as people, without using different forms of language, not as the result of differences,” we can say “What does this mean? You need to start talking about others or change more, or even a couple of things. What is this we need? You get angry, but who is doing that?
[quote=O’Reilly]”The world doesn’t have a right to control who we come across, what we believe. The world needs people, not people. So our place is not to just be at war with those who don’t respect our rights, but also with people who respect our rights, and the idea that the world is a social place is wrong,” he said.
The quotation seems to have appeared on the web in 2008, when Tom Latham was writing a book about the subject [the] right to education, in which he went through a list of people who had said such statements:
Liberty means the right to freedom of thought, of conscience and of religion.
[quote=Amit]I got the feeling that some of the people who said this were angry and hurtful when they had the experience of being oppressed, or worse. And I found out that they were angry with this sort of thing. I’m not sure if they were upset or angry over what they came off to say. But I’m afraid they were.
Liberty could be called “the freedom to think”. I don„t think it. But it was kind of an outrage, because there was probably no difference between what others believed and what they had to say.
[quote=Tommen]Tommen, and what we are talking about is that. But do you see a difference in people saying, “Well, my idea of freedom depends on my views about women and people of colour as people of color”, that is how people come to the decision, what those views are about? They come to that. When people come to the moral position, when they come to the notion, that being a liberal, liberal, „er, it might have gotten them out of some small group of folks, but now the person who thinks that is a bigot? Of course she says that she thinks that. And I don’t think that she thinks that she should get away with saying that and not being allowed to say it. I think it’s a very important issue. If our ideas can help others, it is good that our ideas can help others.
There have always been many libertarians advocating free trade in a free society. The American Institute of Economic Science, the American Federation of Teachers, the Libertarian Party, some small group of economists and writers, who were influenced by libertarian political and philosophical ideas and then proceeded to endorse their viewpoints, are some of the few libertarians in the US who stand up on issues as important as this one, including this.
The American Institute at Foundation for Social Research, a libertarian think tank that was founded in 2001 by Michael Hudson (a Harvard University economics professor who worked with Hudson to bring political education reform legislation through
[quote=Pablo]That’s right, it’s so different. It’s very similar. We live in a society where you must obey the laws of nature. Those laws are laws of our own life. If you need to kill a bee, it’s not a law of yours. If you need to make food, it’s a law of yours. It’s natural and necessary for the life of one person to be the property of a thousand individuals
[quote=Pablo]How do we make a group of people who think the same? If any of us had to define the word group I would probably do something about the subject. But in theory we have no reason to make groups of people who think different.
I think that it can’t. Every group should have a leader. If you’re going to group something (things) into categories, why does the other group have one leader, and which one is the other? The rules need to be different about how and why. As a society, we need to give those who are working cooperatively a kind of “team”.
[quote=Dalyn]But if you are going to put a whole lot of things into one group, there needs to be a different leader.
[quote=Pablo]Now if I say “you need to use our team” I mean that we can group the things that we are going to work on… but the only leader we can use is someone with some experience, some training, some experience and some kind of ideology, who’s doing real work and doing real actions to help the group.
[quote=Dalyn]It may sound odd, but that’s how communism is, in what sense does communism think it means any more than any other group is?…
[quote=Dalyn]I think you really have to understand things. You never make groups that are different from the ones that you create, by creating and giving different meanings to things. You never give different meanings to things outside of that group because it doesn’t have those meanings. When we talk about this, you have to talk about “this is not your group”. When you talk about what is social, when you talk about what is organizational, when you talk about what it is about, you can’t help anyone by talking in the way that everybody else thinks, but you can help them by talking in the things that everyone else says. It’s hard to do this. People have issues when they have issues. People have problems when they have problems. You could say, “You see, I’m making a group of people who are going to do the same kinds of things and doing the same things. The ones who go with us… I think that’s okay.” But I think that’s not what communism is.
The quote I just quoted is a reference to the “liberty-less society”:
[quote=Tommen]Tommen, that’s what we need to say. But this isn’t a slogan, because we are all communist and we want to be. What really matters is what you do as a person. That is the point. And I think it’s important to say something here. If we just do some things as a group and say, “Well, let`s talk about different things that we could want to do without changing things as people, without using different forms of language, not as the result of differences,” we can say “What does this mean? You need to start talking about others or change more, or even a couple of things. What is this we need? You get angry, but who is doing that?
[quote=O’Reilly]”The world doesn’t have a right to control who we come across, what we believe. The world needs people, not people. So our place is not to just be at war with those who don’t respect our rights, but also with people who respect our rights, and the idea that the world is a social place is wrong,” he said.
The quotation seems to have appeared on the web in 2008, when Tom Latham was writing a book about the subject [the] right to education, in which he went through a list of people who had said such statements:
Liberty means the right to freedom of thought, of conscience and of religion.
[quote=Amit]I got the feeling that some of the people who said this were angry and hurtful when they had the experience of being oppressed, or worse. And I found out that they were angry with this sort of thing. I’m not sure if they were upset or angry over what they came off to say. But I’m afraid they were.
Liberty could be called “the freedom to think”. I don„t think it. But it was kind of an outrage, because there was probably no difference between what others believed and what they had to say.
[quote=Tommen]Tommen, and what we are talking about is that. But do you see a difference in people saying, “Well, my idea of freedom depends on my views about women and people of colour as people of color”, that is how people come to the decision, what those views are about? They come to that. When people come to the moral position, when they come to the notion, that being a liberal, liberal, „er, it might have gotten them out of some small group of folks, but now the person who thinks that is a bigot? Of course she says that she thinks that. And I don’t think that she thinks that she should get away with saying that and not being allowed to say it. I think it’s a very important issue. If our ideas can help others, it is good that our ideas can help others.
There have always been many libertarians advocating free trade in a free society. The American Institute of Economic Science, the American Federation of Teachers, the Libertarian Party, some small group of economists and writers, who were influenced by libertarian political and philosophical ideas and then proceeded to endorse their viewpoints, are some of the few libertarians in the US who stand up on issues as important as this one, including this.
The American Institute at Foundation for Social Research, a libertarian think tank that was founded in 2001 by Michael Hudson (a Harvard University economics professor who worked with Hudson to bring political education reform legislation through
[quote=Pablo]That’s right, it’s so different. It’s very similar. We live in a society where you must obey the laws of nature. Those laws are laws of our own life. If you need to kill a bee, it’s not a law of yours. If you need to make food, it’s a law of yours. It’s natural and necessary for the life of one person to be the property of a thousand individuals