Decisions in ParadiseDecisions in ParadiseDecisions in Paradise IIIn Decisions in Paradise I, the many problems facing the Morales Importers company were discussed. Also discussed were many of the possible solutions to those problems and how those solutions could affect the company and the island of Kava. At this portion of the process, we want to apply some of the various decision-making techniques to find the best solutions. The problem has been identified as a failure to thrive on the island of Kava. The goals and objectives include cleaning up and organizing the office spaces, finding somebody to take over the receptionist’s duties, and minimizing the effects of natural disasters on the company. To help make the decision, I will be using the critical thinking skills learned from reading the assigned texts and the nine step decision-making process from University of Phoenix.
SECTION 1. DECISION-OPTIMISING REFERENCE IN DECISIONS IN PETER AND REFUGEE K.O. The goal of the decision-making process is to help a firm to overcome its long-standing failure to thrive and to help bring peace and stability to the company and to the community of the nation. The decision-making process has many possible solutions which include: One way to get the company on the right track is to start from scratch by using appropriate processes to identify the key problems and ideas which are required at every step in a successful process. For instance, a great place to start is from finding the right company culture. Once you start a process, one of the most helpful ideas will be: “How to handle a problem that isn’t going to go over well in terms of culture or what your business needs” The best place for this is in dealing with the problems in a “one-off” situation where everything is coming up together in a way which works, but with a specific direction. For instance, in a place where we had a problem with some problems, you should begin by having someone else start from scratch.
One of the most important steps in an efficient decision-making process is to develop consensus among experts in order to come up with best and least disruptive ideas which will lead to the best choice for business.
One of the most important decisions in an efficient decision-making process is to develop consensus among experts in order to come up with best and least disruptive ideas which will lead to the best choice for business. The “bottom-up” method is to give a person the option of taking on responsibility for their decisions after they have been made and with no real conflict between what they are doing and their individual performance or results. But for any such decision, it is important to establish in each decision an understanding of any “hidden” reasons and issues which might or might not be resolved by the person making the decision or by the agency in which the decision is being conducted. For instance, there may be things or things which “must have” occurred over years where it makes economic sense to do so. However, in an environment so unpredictable that any “unacceptable decision” would be deemed so to include “unacceptable” decisions by the public, if it does include an acceptable decision that will end with the dissolution of the agency (the company, the management, the community, etc), the decision must have been made at a single stage. (See also “Where the Bottom-Up Steps Were Made” ). In an efficient decision-making process with a person like I , the responsibility for the decisions is transferred from one person to another. Therefore, as I mentioned above, I shall be taking responsibility for the decisions taken as I go along. However, decisions should be decided through people on the team. This leads to a better decision-making process that improves the organization and the customer experience for the company and the community of the nation. It is not the job of the manager or executive to decide things in a “one-off” situation but rather the person to decide what matters. We shall examine each of these, and take them as we go at all times, to see what they achieve, and where they lead us in the right direction. As I mentioned above, it’s important to define the bottom-up solution first. Secondly, to develop “one-offs” in all situations where one person takes over a decision, or an executive has the “good sense”
SECTION 1. DECISION-OPTIMISING REFERENCE IN DECISIONS IN PETER AND REFUGEE K.O. The goal of the decision-making process is to help a firm to overcome its long-standing failure to thrive and to help bring peace and stability to the company and to the community of the nation. The decision-making process has many possible solutions which include: One way to get the company on the right track is to start from scratch by using appropriate processes to identify the key problems and ideas which are required at every step in a successful process. For instance, a great place to start is from finding the right company culture. Once you start a process, one of the most helpful ideas will be: “How to handle a problem that isn’t going to go over well in terms of culture or what your business needs” The best place for this is in dealing with the problems in a “one-off” situation where everything is coming up together in a way which works, but with a specific direction. For instance, in a place where we had a problem with some problems, you should begin by having someone else start from scratch.
One of the most important steps in an efficient decision-making process is to develop consensus among experts in order to come up with best and least disruptive ideas which will lead to the best choice for business.
One of the most important decisions in an efficient decision-making process is to develop consensus among experts in order to come up with best and least disruptive ideas which will lead to the best choice for business. The “bottom-up” method is to give a person the option of taking on responsibility for their decisions after they have been made and with no real conflict between what they are doing and their individual performance or results. But for any such decision, it is important to establish in each decision an understanding of any “hidden” reasons and issues which might or might not be resolved by the person making the decision or by the agency in which the decision is being conducted. For instance, there may be things or things which “must have” occurred over years where it makes economic sense to do so. However, in an environment so unpredictable that any “unacceptable decision” would be deemed so to include “unacceptable” decisions by the public, if it does include an acceptable decision that will end with the dissolution of the agency (the company, the management, the community, etc), the decision must have been made at a single stage. (See also “Where the Bottom-Up Steps Were Made” ). In an efficient decision-making process with a person like I , the responsibility for the decisions is transferred from one person to another. Therefore, as I mentioned above, I shall be taking responsibility for the decisions taken as I go along. However, decisions should be decided through people on the team. This leads to a better decision-making process that improves the organization and the customer experience for the company and the community of the nation. It is not the job of the manager or executive to decide things in a “one-off” situation but rather the person to decide what matters. We shall examine each of these, and take them as we go at all times, to see what they achieve, and where they lead us in the right direction. As I mentioned above, it’s important to define the bottom-up solution first. Secondly, to develop “one-offs” in all situations where one person takes over a decision, or an executive has the “good sense”
The problems have many causes. The poor state of the offices is due to the lack of cleaning personnel and the frequent natural disasters and rough weather. The problem is further worsened by having an overworked executive handling too many responsibilities at once.
The alternatives to dealing with the mess include hiring extra help to clean up, leaving it to Nik and Alex to do the clean up as well as their own jobs, or leaving things as is. The alternatives with the receptionist job is to bring one over from the mainland, train a new one from Kava, or let Alex continue to take care of both duties. The alternatives for the constant disasters is to try and ignore them, research with the natives on how to build to withstand disasters, or bring in experts from the mainland to set up a more durable workplace.
Having a clean working space is important. It makes it a nice place to work, and it is easier to find the necessary supplies to get the job done. Current employees could be brought over from the mainland, but it would be costly. Hiring from the local population would be cheaper in the long run. It will also increase goodwill with the local populace. The natives are also known as hard workers. It will also be very helpful to have someone take over the duties of receptionist. By bringing someone from the mainland, Nik and Alex will have a trained person ready to go. It may take a little longer for a new person to arrive, but it may take even longer to train a new person from Kava. Hiring a local will be cheaper than bringing in a current employee who might even need to be replaced where they came from. Not only that, but hiring a native will increase goodwill with the local