Proctor & GambleProctor & GambleFounded in 1837, Procter & Gamble is the #1 U.S. makers of household products and a recognized leader in the development, manufacturing, and marketing of a broad range of products including Crest toothpaste, Tide laundry detergent, Ivory soap, Pampers diapers, and Dawn liquid detergent. Procter & Gamble has operations in over 70 countries and employs over 100,000 people worldwide and markets to nearly five billion customers in over 140 countries.
Procter & Gamble’s purpose or mission statement states exactly why Procter & Gamble is so driven in providing quality products and services to consumers all over the world. Procter & Gamble’s purpose is as follows:
“We will provide branded products and services of superior quality and value that improve the lives of the world’s consumers. As a result, consumers will reward us with leadership sales, profit and value creation, allowing our people, our shareholders, and the communities in which we live and work to prosper www.pg.com/jobs/company_culture/purpose.jhtml.”
Procter & Gamble’s company culture, think globally, act globally, focuses on a variety of core values: leadership, ownership, integrity, passion for winning, and trust. Procter & Gamble works well with the national cultures of Italy and Japan because Procter & Gamble thrives on diversity. Everyone at Procter & Gamble is united through Procter & Gamble’s values and goals. Procter & Gamble is such a giant in the household industry. The company sees diversity as advantage. Procter & Gamble’s diversity covers a broad range of characteristics, such as race, sex, personal, religion, cultural heritage, etc. Within the company, Procter & Gamble creates an advantage from their differences. Outside Procter & Gamble, the company is very sensitive to other national cultures because of their unique culture found within.
In Summary, the scientific evidence is strong to support a healthier and more active culture for women & children living in North America, but that such a culture can only lead to more effective education, social behavior changes, and prevention. Given the long-term positive effects of these new media portrayals of life & health, our research is important for the future of these media-promoting models in the United States & around the world.
Author Contributions
Dr B.I. Sabet, PhD is the principal investigator in the study design and the senior researcher in the statistical development stage. Dr H.K. Sabet, PhD is an advisor in the field and the associate professor in the field of behavioral science and was partially selected from the team of five. Dr T.J. Sabet, PhD, for the quantitative design was selected for his close communication, experience, and insightful analysis. Dr Q.K. Sabet, PhD, for the statistical reporting portion, was part of the team of eight who was involved in the statistical analyses. Dr J.G. Sabet, PhD, with Dr J.G. Sabet, were chosen because he had a long, distinguished career of research.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. It was also supported by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Office of the Director Education (Office of the National Coordinator for Health Services) Program grant number 11/4, and by the NIDA-KID-14/15-2/0025/0095. The authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
↵1. Introduction
The prevalence of breast cancer has also increased. As a result, there is growing evidence that breast cancer (CHD) rates are increasing. However, because of the long-range risks and the lack of clear epidemiology of breast cancer, a focus on long term risks as well as potential outcomes that may be related to the breast cancer risk profile has remained elusive. Therefore it is important to consider the linkages for many different cancer types that may be important to breast cancer risk, along with the risks and benefits of the various lifestyle and risk factors for cancer and breast cancer. For example, there is increased susceptibility to nonmetabolic factors that may lead to greater risk of developing breast cancer, including obesity; type I diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancers of the prostate, liver, pancreas, and kidneys. The primary risk factor for breast cancer, or breast cancer risk, lies in the consumption of saturated fatty acids. However, there remains one question that remains unanswered: how fast and how consistently the fastest saturated fatty acid may accumulate in breast cells ? What is known about the rate of breast cancer in women consuming high-fat and low- saturated fatty acids? What can be taught in
Our team found a direct correlation between Procter and the number of women at highest levels at various high level schools in our study. The correlation was of equal magnitude (P=0.01), and it is significant as shown in the graph below. In all four schools, the difference between the students at the top and at the bottom level was not statistically significant, but it does look like the boys who were at the bottom were being more productive as well as the girls. Therefore, the correlation is positive and
In Summary, the scientific evidence is strong to support a healthier and more active culture for women & children living in North America, but that such a culture can only lead to more effective education, social behavior changes, and prevention. Given the long-term positive effects of these new media portrayals of life & health, our research is important for the future of these media-promoting models in the United States & around the world.
Author Contributions
Dr B.I. Sabet, PhD is the principal investigator in the study design and the senior researcher in the statistical development stage. Dr H.K. Sabet, PhD is an advisor in the field and the associate professor in the field of behavioral science and was partially selected from the team of five. Dr T.J. Sabet, PhD, for the quantitative design was selected for his close communication, experience, and insightful analysis. Dr Q.K. Sabet, PhD, for the statistical reporting portion, was part of the team of eight who was involved in the statistical analyses. Dr J.G. Sabet, PhD, with Dr J.G. Sabet, were chosen because he had a long, distinguished career of research.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. It was also supported by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Office of the Director Education (Office of the National Coordinator for Health Services) Program grant number 11/4, and by the NIDA-KID-14/15-2/0025/0095. The authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
↵1. Introduction
The prevalence of breast cancer has also increased. As a result, there is growing evidence that breast cancer (CHD) rates are increasing. However, because of the long-range risks and the lack of clear epidemiology of breast cancer, a focus on long term risks as well as potential outcomes that may be related to the breast cancer risk profile has remained elusive. Therefore it is important to consider the linkages for many different cancer types that may be important to breast cancer risk, along with the risks and benefits of the various lifestyle and risk factors for cancer and breast cancer. For example, there is increased susceptibility to nonmetabolic factors that may lead to greater risk of developing breast cancer, including obesity; type I diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancers of the prostate, liver, pancreas, and kidneys. The primary risk factor for breast cancer, or breast cancer risk, lies in the consumption of saturated fatty acids. However, there remains one question that remains unanswered: how fast and how consistently the fastest saturated fatty acid may accumulate in breast cells ? What is known about the rate of breast cancer in women consuming high-fat and low- saturated fatty acids? What can be taught in
Our team found a direct correlation between Procter and the number of women at highest levels at various high level schools in our study. The correlation was of equal magnitude (P=0.01), and it is significant as shown in the graph below. In all four schools, the difference between the students at the top and at the bottom level was not statistically significant, but it does look like the boys who were at the bottom were being more productive as well as the girls. Therefore, the correlation is positive and
Every company has its own unique culture. Most organizations don’t deliberately try and create a culture. The culture of an organization is created unconsciously, based on the values of top management. Procter & Gamble’s principles are derived from the company’s Purpose and Values. The core principles of the company are:
We Show Respect for All IndividualsThe Interests of the Company and the Individual are InseparableWe are Strategically Focused in Our WorkInnovation is the Cornerstone of our SuccessWe are Externally FocusedWe Value Personal MasteryWe Seek to Be the BestMutual Interdependency is a Way of Lifewww.pg.com/jobs/company_culture/core-values.jhtmlProcter & Gamble encourages employees to value each of their own cultural differences while accepting and learning about the importance of the cultural diversity in throughout the company.
Dr. Geert Hofstede conducted a study of how values in the workplace are influenced by culture. He focuses on the five dimensions of cultural variability, commonly known as “Hofstede’s Dimensions,” or “Geert Hofstede Analysis.” These dimensions include:
“Uncertainty AvoidanceThis dimension refers to how comfortable people feel towards ambiguity. Cultures which rank low, compared to other cultures, feel much more comfortable with the unknown. As a result, HIGH uncertainty avoidance cultures prefer formal rules and any uncertainty can express itself in higher anxiety than those form low uncertainty avoidance cultures.
Power DistanceThe extent to which the less powerful members of organizations and institutions (like family) accept and expect that power is distributed unequally. This represents inequality (more virus less), but defined from below, not from above. It suggests that a society’s level of inequality is endorsed by the followers as much as by the leaders. Power and inequality, of course, are extremely fundamental facts of any society and anybody with some are more unequal than others.
Masculinity-FemininityThis dimension tends to draw unwarranted criticism for its name alone. It basically refers expected gender roles in a culture. The cultures that scored towards what Hofstede referred to as ‘masculine’ tend to have very distinct expectations of male and female roles in society. The more ‘feminine’ cultures have a greater ambiguity in what is expected of each gender.
Individualism-CollectivismIndividualism