Harborco Analysis
Essay Preview: Harborco Analysis
Report this essay
Paper #1: Harborco Analysis
The Situation
As the lone representative of Harborco, I was thrust into a 15 on 1 situation in the board room. I knew that though I held much power in the case, it was imperative to make sure the groups did not side together against me. I began simply by discussing the importance of the project and how I wish to gain everyones support. I focused on the least powerful groups at first, awarding them small victories in order to gain support. With a small group of allies in my corner, I began negotiation with Daniel Kim who represented the FED. I knew this was the most important negotiation for Harborco and tried to smoothly approach the subject. I explained first the importance of the money needed and how it will signify great returns for the area where the plant will be built. I discussed the benefits this project would have to all and at the end asked the FED for the 3 billion dollar loan. I expected a smooth yes and to quickly move on to other topics. However, I was met with a hostile rejection by Daniel Kim and even a rude comment that explained to me that I will never even get close to that amount. I was personally shocked, I did not expect this to be a problem, and asked the FED why they refused to fund such a beneficial project. Daniel Kim answered that they didnt trust my company and have other projects they would rather fund. He then said that the most the FED was willing to offer was 500 million dollars. Though still shocked at what I was hearing, I explained again how important this project is, and that the money would be put to good use. I explained that Harborco would not be able to afford such a project without the FEDs help and all of our negotiation lies in this issue. Once again, Daniel Kim was not budging and kept on laughing away my request for 3 Billion dollars. With the small group of allies confronting Kim, the blockers (other ports) confronted me by saying that I was a big company and could afford this on our own. The negotiations werent going anywhere. Daniel Kim and I began to start arguing over why I need the money and why he wouldnt give it to us. After explaining to him that 500 million wasnt even an option on the sheet, he moved up to 1 billion and said either take it or leave it. I tried to further negotiate with him, but he wouldnt even answer my questions and continued to offer a take it or leave it approach.
The Analysis
Emotions run high in situations like this, in both simulations and the real world. People fight so hard for their side, that they tend to turn stubborn and ignorant. Daniel Kims reaction to my request for 3 Billion dollars not only ruined the smooth flow of the negotiation but also changed my entire approach. I planned
on chipping away, one group at a time until everyone was somewhat happy with the results. However with the FEDs unwillingness to properly negotiate the whole project seemed to be in jeopardy. Daniel Kim explained that there is no point in even arguing about this and that he would refuse to give more than 1 Billion dollars. Even as other groups intervened and tried to offer solutions he would not budge. I all of a sudden had to jump onto the offense and attack Kim for being so stubborn and unwilling to listen. I said that if he wont even consider moving up from the 1 billion figure that this negotiation might as well stop right here. I knew I would not take any less than 2 Billion and that he would not give a penny over 1 Billion. We were in a serious deadlock, one much similar to Hacker and Star. Both of us, refused to budge and threats started being thrown around. He said he had no problem not giving me anything in terms of funding, and I said that this project was not going to go through if he didnt, and that the rest of the groups could blame the FED. If he was Hacker