Define the Distinctions Between Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Sources in a Secondary SearchEssay Preview: Define the Distinctions Between Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Sources in a Secondary SearchReport this essayIndividual AssignmentOctober 10, 2011Individual AssignmentChapter 7: 2. Define the distinctions between primary, secondary, and tertiary sources in a secondary search.Primary sources are part of the academic research for what every topic he or she studies and by what sources him or her collect information. Such as articles, books, or even letters written by different people of creditability and interview of someone in that field of study through lectures are speeches. With scholars and primary sources, he or she searches for updated data material that has not yet reported by other scholars. Sometimes the data is not well reported or it is interpreted in a different way or an error in the reports by other scholars, which or, secondary sources.
A main search involves a number of general things; the list of secondary sources is in many ways a hierarchy of sorts. One group of sources is often a group of sources for which the primary source is very similar or is a comparison to primary sources, or also for which he or she is highly knowledgeable and or very close to others. A secondary source is a particular type of source or subgroup of source that needs attention and does not need the attention of primary sources.There are a number of sources who, despite different views (or because of different opinions), are considered independent sources of knowledge, sometimes of different fields or different people, and are subject to criticism by both individual and broad body of scientific opinion. This group seems to have a broader meaning than the one we just used when we looked at primary source sources. It is said that secondary source sources can be discussed in more of a general way through more of a hierarchical system. Some in a “proper” way have taken secondary source sources of knowledge and are said to do a better job of summarizing and presenting such things. I would suggest that one can take primary source sources of knowledge as source that is relevant as or better from a “professional or even more general” perspective. They should give the academic an opportunity to discuss topics related to all sorts of fields or to draw the attention of the faculty and general public. This will help avoid that, for example a person’s own teaching or teaching of a particular subject that only an academic researcher will be able interpret to provide a more complete description of. In the absence of more formal research, a person may not be able to make proper use of those sources, and with it the potential for plagiarism and dishonesty. The most important source of primary source information should not be a source for a single person per se, if all of his or her knowledge is being shared for profit or public purposes. But one should be careful not to use sources if one is the only one sharing them. In many cases, sources are made available to the more senior or less eminent members of the public who will have access to their views, perhaps through the publications or journals other people share directly with them. This is probably just a list of people who might want to know more about the primary source sources of the topic. It can be done by the fact that some of them might be able to provide more information to the scholarly community. Some such sources could be part of the list of primary sources, and might help some of the top-ranking faculty in the profession to better respond to some of their suggestions for information. Perhaps we can talk more about an individual source, or perhaps of individual source authors.The primary source sources are important for two reasons. Firstly, they can provide an interesting look into a subject being discussed. Then because we have an essay for each of those sources, there will be a lot of information to look through. The primary source sources provide many different perspectives and possibilities for an academic to apply to the topic, all of which can be expressed in a way that will be valuable as well as valuable as the particular way that it may be discussed in future. The second reason for presenting the primary sources presents several questions to a student or student-athlete, but it is not a question that student-athletes or teachers should ask. The primary sources will not give us everything we want. I encourage all student-athletes and teachers alike to use them as a starting point. I want many students and teachers on all levels to be able to explore the major, major, and major branches of knowledge. This is a difficult task, because it’s not about finding an objective solution, but about seeking that truth out in every person and group.
A main search involves a number of general things; the list of secondary sources is in many ways a hierarchy of sorts. One group of sources is often a group of sources for which the primary source is very similar or is a comparison to primary sources, or also for which he or she is highly knowledgeable and or very close to others. A secondary source is a particular type of source or subgroup of source that needs attention and does not need the attention of primary sources.There are a number of sources who, despite different views (or because of different opinions), are considered independent sources of knowledge, sometimes of different fields or different people, and are subject to criticism by both individual and broad body of scientific opinion. This group seems to have a broader meaning than the one we just used when we looked at primary source sources. It is said that secondary source sources can be discussed in more of a general way through more of a hierarchical system. Some in a “proper” way have taken secondary source sources of knowledge and are said to do a better job of summarizing and presenting such things. I would suggest that one can take primary source sources of knowledge as source that is relevant as or better from a “professional or even more general” perspective. They should give the academic an opportunity to discuss topics related to all sorts of fields or to draw the attention of the faculty and general public. This will help avoid that, for example a person’s own teaching or teaching of a particular subject that only an academic researcher will be able interpret to provide a more complete description of. In the absence of more formal research, a person may not be able to make proper use of those sources, and with it the potential for plagiarism and dishonesty. The most important source of primary source information should not be a source for a single person per se, if all of his or her knowledge is being shared for profit or public purposes. But one should be careful not to use sources if one is the only one sharing them. In many cases, sources are made available to the more senior or less eminent members of the public who will have access to their views, perhaps through the publications or journals other people share directly with them. This is probably just a list of people who might want to know more about the primary source sources of the topic. It can be done by the fact that some of them might be able to provide more information to the scholarly community. Some such sources could be part of the list of primary sources, and might help some of the top-ranking faculty in the profession to better respond to some of their suggestions for information. Perhaps we can talk more about an individual source, or perhaps of individual source authors.The primary source sources are important for two reasons. Firstly, they can provide an interesting look into a subject being discussed. Then because we have an essay for each of those sources, there will be a lot of information to look through. The primary source sources provide many different perspectives and possibilities for an academic to apply to the topic, all of which can be expressed in a way that will be valuable as well as valuable as the particular way that it may be discussed in future. The second reason for presenting the primary sources presents several questions to a student or student-athlete, but it is not a question that student-athletes or teachers should ask. The primary sources will not give us everything we want. I encourage all student-athletes and teachers alike to use them as a starting point. I want many students and teachers on all levels to be able to explore the major, major, and major branches of knowledge. This is a difficult task, because it’s not about finding an objective solution, but about seeking that truth out in every person and group.
A main search involves a number of general things; the list of secondary sources is in many ways a hierarchy of sorts. One group of sources is often a group of sources for which the primary source is very similar or is a comparison to primary sources, or also for which he or she is highly knowledgeable and or very close to others. A secondary source is a particular type of source or subgroup of source that needs attention and does not need the attention of primary sources.There are a number of sources who, despite different views (or because of different opinions), are considered independent sources of knowledge, sometimes of different fields or different people, and are subject to criticism by both individual and broad body of scientific opinion. This group seems to have a broader meaning than the one we just used when we looked at primary source sources. It is said that secondary source sources can be discussed in more of a general way through more of a hierarchical system. Some in a “proper” way have taken secondary source sources of knowledge and are said to do a better job of summarizing and presenting such things. I would suggest that one can take primary source sources of knowledge as source that is relevant as or better from a “professional or even more general” perspective. They should give the academic an opportunity to discuss topics related to all sorts of fields or to draw the attention of the faculty and general public. This will help avoid that, for example a person’s own teaching or teaching of a particular subject that only an academic researcher will be able interpret to provide a more complete description of. In the absence of more formal research, a person may not be able to make proper use of those sources, and with it the potential for plagiarism and dishonesty. The most important source of primary source information should not be a source for a single person per se, if all of his or her knowledge is being shared for profit or public purposes. But one should be careful not to use sources if one is the only one sharing them. In many cases, sources are made available to the more senior or less eminent members of the public who will have access to their views, perhaps through the publications or journals other people share directly with them. This is probably just a list of people who might want to know more about the primary source sources of the topic. It can be done by the fact that some of them might be able to provide more information to the scholarly community. Some such sources could be part of the list of primary sources, and might help some of the top-ranking faculty in the profession to better respond to some of their suggestions for information. Perhaps we can talk more about an individual source, or perhaps of individual source authors.The primary source sources are important for two reasons. Firstly, they can provide an interesting look into a subject being discussed. Then because we have an essay for each of those sources, there will be a lot of information to look through. The primary source sources provide many different perspectives and possibilities for an academic to apply to the topic, all of which can be expressed in a way that will be valuable as well as valuable as the particular way that it may be discussed in future. The second reason for presenting the primary sources presents several questions to a student or student-athlete, but it is not a question that student-athletes or teachers should ask. The primary sources will not give us everything we want. I encourage all student-athletes and teachers alike to use them as a starting point. I want many students and teachers on all levels to be able to explore the major, major, and major branches of knowledge. This is a difficult task, because it’s not about finding an objective solution, but about seeking that truth out in every person and group.
Secondary sources are studies that usually consist of studies, which evaluate, interpret, analyze, and are critical of primary sources. They are events that account for data that have already occurred and are sources of primary sources. Secondary sources make data accessible through assessing and distributing of data. In doing this scholars can determine what other scholars have reported on any given research topic and scholars compare data.
Tertiary sources do the digesting and compiling of primary and secondary sources. Such material that come from textbooks and reference materials are a form of tertiary sources, if their primary purpose list, repackage ideas, or summarize. This source would be dictionaries and the encyclopedias.
5. Some researchers find that their sole sources are secondary data. Why might this be? Name some management questions for which secondary data sources are probably the only ones feasible.
Secondary data is the sole source available for researchers. Secondary data can be a tough source to use in research, but there are several instances that can cause secondary data to be the only sources available. Compilations of data are categorized as secondary sources because it made up of information interpreted for a purpose. Another reason is the time in which he or she is researching. This may also be the situation for those researching historical events. Reference books may be the only sources available if the historic events have happened very far in the past or there are no primary resources available any longer. Time and type of information researched play a direct role in this situation.
Some examples of management questions for which secondary data sources are probably the only ones feasible are as follows (Ganly, 2010).What are the differences between company sales in the months of December and January?What is the average revenue of the company in the past three years?What is the amount of returning customers in the past three years?7. What problems of secondary data quality must researchers face? How can they deal with them?With secondary data quality, the problems that occur should be important to every researcher to deal with problems that they will encounter and how best to deal with them. The problems that researchers will face is verification and determining the validity of the secondary sources that a researcher choices to use. Secondary data is just that, it is data that, anyone can post information in which some of it will not be credible, but just opinions from different people. This is why it is very important to research in-depth to discover if the secondary data is collected is credible, trustworthy, accurate, and valid. To evaluate secondary sources a researcher must consider the purpose, scope, authority, and audience the information is collected on (Cooper & Schindler, 2006). With any secondary data one must also understand the problems that it presents and how best to deal with bias in analysis and results.
Chapter 8: How does qualitative research differ from quantitative research?Using a qualitative research method can produce differing data because the means of interpretation differ. Quantitative must produce the same data because the systems of analysis used for quantitative data use equations that can cater to specific data. To understand