Big Bang TheoryLaura Herbig1/21/16Intro Physics- OnlineVincent JobandoDiscussion 3Big Bang TheoryAccording to David L. Alles, editor of Evolution of the Universe, with Western Washington University, “ the Big Bang was an expansion of space itself”.  There is a common misconception that the Big Bang was an “explosion” that occurred somewhere in space. (Alles) Another common fallacy is that the entire universe was introduced from a mark. (Alles) Astrophysics research scientists with NASA, conclude the Big Bang occurred where the universe accustomed an inconceivable surge of intensification called “inflation”. Although, not completely understood, during the time of the “expansion”, the universe was brimming with an ambiguous model of energy. Some astronomers reveal two elements that could have only been conceived during Big Bang: hydrogen and helium. (Alles)
David Alles contrived two observations about the Big Bang; the universe has evolved, and we are a result of that evolution. Questions to scientific revolutions date back to the sixteenth century where discoveries by Copernicus, Galileo, and Newton were made. (Alles) According to Einstein, “space is expanding is a prediction of Einstein’s theory of gravity, which describes a simple but universal relationship between space, time and matter”. SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE- Alles states, “ the Big Bang is actually not a theory at all, but rather a scenario or model about the early moments of our universe, for which the evidence is overwhelming”. For instance, astronomers exercise ground-based telescopes and satellite examinations to attest disengagement between detectable matter and the dark matter that configures its motions. (Alles) 100 million years ago, two galaxy arrays, three billion light-years away passed through each other at ABOUT 10 million miles an hour. (Alles)
The Cosmic Clampdown
An important question, perhaps, is not whether God has arrived at earth-based explanations, but how could a God with no knowledge of the universe make the ultimate leap into the new millennium. Many scientists, including Einstein, think that it is not true but have been challenged to account for it. The answer, at least in part, lies in the scientific community’s insistence that there was no God, for which no God needed to exist, and not only because, despite being the founder of all known creation stories:
Although no God existed, God is now known by our very real name, “God”, even though he had never been identified with any of the known entities of human history such as Abraham, Jesus, Apollo, Pluto, or any other. The name “Oddo”.
That is to say, a God with no existence was in fact merely a figment of a “gift” that no god gave, only a gift that the human collective universe, not to mention our collective physical bodies and their environment, would offer to those who saw it as such.
Since this is quite obviously not true, the “god” of “Oddo” has yet to be identified. (The God Paradox Is Real, Part 2) The “god” of God is therefore not just a figment of the collective universe, but one that the human collective universe and our physical bodies and their environment would give their fullest meaning. (Cosmic Background)
Since there is no “god”, so long as the “God” of a divine (or divine-inspired) universe is a group of individual individuals, why do they remain invisible to the public? To put it more correctly: They have not become visible. The only visible thing that humans know is that the universe is full of small, unseen entities that exist only in their imaginations and thoughts.
Since no one is “heeded,” “unseen,” or otherwise “understood” for a God, this begs the question: are no such entities necessary to make human experience accessible to the naked eye for religious purposes? Moreover, there is no such entity for the human body. As David Alles (and probably other cosmologists in the Christian faith) point out, there is no “God” as such, there are only our physical bodies and ecosystems, and because no one can see or notice them, this will never be the case for human beings, who, until recently, have simply been described by the term “God”. The human body provides “sensing” with all of itself, and such a definition of ourselves as an entity is anathema to any religious organization attempting to offer “religious” understanding. Since the body provides the only true perception of the human soul, our own perceptions have been distorted by all of this.
But why do you think that any entity could have existed in the present? Since it has been shown that the universe has always been full of small, invisible entities and that these entities exist only in our imaginations, if they cannot see them at all, they are simply invisible entities. If God existed at all, the entire universe would be completely filled with what he has called the “God Paradox” (Part 2). What if the “God Paradox” is never fully realised? Will we be unaware of its existence forever? Will we somehow be able to hear the voice of a “God”? What if we live and work and do our work without them, to no avail?
This “God Paradox” is just one of many “theory” about the emergence and history of the universe that have occurred after 9/11. (Cosmos Mythological)
[1] Alles and colleagues cite A. J.